Acta Gymnica 2018, 48(2):62-69 | DOI: 10.5507/ag.2018.009

Psychometric properties of the qualitative assessment of manual dexterity in the MABC-2 test

Rudolf Psotta1, Dominika Pechová1, Josef Kraus2
1 Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
2 Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

Background: The Movement Assessment Battery for Children Test, 2nd edition (MABC-2 test) is a widely accepted standardized method for the assessment of motor competency and identification of developmental coordination disorder in children. However, there are no information on psychometric qualities of the qualitative part of the test.

Objective: To reveal possible limitations of the qualitative assessment of the MABC-2 test tasks of the age band 2 (7-10 years), we examined the inter- and intra-rater reliability and construct (known-groups) validity, specifically for observation of the manual dexterity (MD) tasks.

Methods: The MD tasks of the MABC-2 executed by children with and without motor difficulties in manual dexterity (MD- and MD+; N = 6) were recorded by a video camera. A group of investigators (N = 9) performed qualitative observational assessment of children's movements from video recordings, in two observation sessions apart by four weeks (time 1, time 2).

Results: The statistical tests rejected the hypothesis on significant inter-rater reliability in the number of marked signs in the MD tasks. Regarding the intra-rater reliability, the number of marked signs in the MD tasks was not significantly different between observation in time 1 and time 2 in all investigators. 95% agreement limits for the number of marked movement signs in the two repeated observations ranged from Mdiff ± 0.73 up to Mdiff ± 2.63 signs. A good construct validity of the qualitative assessment of movements in the MD tasks was indicated by significantly higher number of movement signs marked in the MD- children as compared to the MD+ children, with exception of the graphomotor task.

Conclusions: The qualitative assessment within the MABC-2 test is a useful tool for the identification of manual dexterity impairment and weaker aspects of hand-eye coordination. However, the qualitative observational assessment of the MABC-2 tasks demands specific training of users.

Keywords: motor test, developmental coordination disorder, validity, reliability, children

Received: January 10, 2018; Accepted: May 22, 2018; Prepublished online: June 14, 2018; Published: June 30, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Psotta, R., Pechová, D., & Kraus, J. (2018). Psychometric properties of the qualitative assessment of manual dexterity in the MABC-2 test. Acta Gymnica, 48(2), 62-69. doi: 10.5507/ag.2018.009
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Go to original source...
    2. Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1999). Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8, 135-160. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Brickenkamp, R., & Zillmer, E. (2000). d2 test of attention. (Czech version by P. Balcar). Prague, Czech Republic: Hogrefe-Testcentrum.
    4. Burton, A. W., & Miller, D. E. (1998). Movement skill assessment. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    6. Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., & Richler, J. J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 2-18. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Gard, L., & Rösblad, B. (2009). The qualitative motor observation in Movement ABC: Aspects of reliability and validity. Advances in Physiotherapy, 11, 51-57. Go to original source...
    8. Gwet, K. L. (2012). Handbook of inter-rater reliability (3rd ed.). Gaithersburg, MD: Advanced Analytics.
    9. Henderson, S. E., & Sugden, D. A. (1992). Movement Assessment Battery for Children. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
    10. Henderson, S. E., Sugden, D. A., & Barnett, A. L. (2007). Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2. London, United Kingdom: Pearson Education. Go to original source...
    11. Kroes, M., Vissers, Y. L. J., Sleijpen, F. A. M., Feron, F. J. M., Kessels, A. G. H., Bakker, E., … Vles, J. S. H. (2004). Reliability and validity of a qualitative and quantitative motor test for 5- to 6-year-old children. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, 8, 135-143. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Psotta, R. (2014). MABC-2. Test motoriky pro děti MABC-2 (1. české vydání) [The Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 Test (1st Czech Edition)]. Prague, Czech Republic: Hogrefe Testcentrum.
    13. Schulz, J., Henderson, S. E., Sugden, D. A., & Barnett, A. (2011). Structural validity of the Movement ABC-2 test: Factor structure comparisons across three age groups. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 1361-1369. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Sim, J., & Arnell, P. (1993). Measurement validity in physical therapy research. Physical Therapy, 73, 102-110. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Smith, G. T. (2005). On construct validity: Issues of method and measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17, 396-408. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Sugden, D. A., & Henderson, S. E. (2007). Ecological intervention for children with movement difficulties. London, United Kingdom: Pearson Education.
    17. Sugden, D., & Wade, M. (2013). Typical and atypical motor development. London, United Kingdom: Mac Keith Press. Go to original source...
    18. Wagner, M. O., Kastner, J., Petermann, F., & Bös, K. (2011). Factorial validity of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (age band 2). Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 674-680. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content