簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃國恩
Huang, Kuo-En
論文名稱: 教練威權領導對集體效能之影響:一個調節式中介模式之檢驗
The Influence of Coach Authoritarian Leadership on Collective Effectiveness: A Moderated Mediation Model
指導教授: 鄭志富
Cheng, Chih-Fu
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 體育學系
Department of Physical Education
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 138
中文關鍵詞: 華人領導威權情感氛圍團隊規範任務相依
英文關鍵詞: Chinese leaderships, authoritarianism, emotional atmosphere, team norm, task dependency
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000170
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:164下載:9
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 威權領導是華人領導組織行為研究中的一個重要議題,在運動情境中,運動團隊就像一個小型企業團體的縮影,有工作性亦有互動性團隊,其教練肩負團隊勝負之責,除訓練時要能展現傲人的能力與風範,讓團隊產生正向積極的氛圍與紀律規範外,當比賽時面臨決勝危機時刻,須能號令三軍,制定決策,帶領隊員團結一致,提升團隊集體意識與效能,才能力挽狂瀾、邁向成功。因此,本研究目的,主要瞭解在運動團隊中教練尚嚴領導與專權領導對集體效能的影響效果,並進一步探究正向團隊情感氛圍與團隊規範,在其中所扮演的中介角色,及任務相依性在中介模式之調節效果。研究方法採立意取樣方式,以國內24所大學校院運動代表隊的教練與選手為受試對象,並以團隊為單位共計取樣174隊,其中教練人數計有174人,運動員970人,合計有1144位研究參與者。其所得資料經飾檢建檔後,採用SPSS for windows20.0及AMOS 21 統計軟體,依研究假設進行相關的檢驗與分析。研究結果顯示尚嚴領導與專權領導對集體效能具有不同方向的影響效果,並且會透過正向團隊情感氛圍及團隊規範的中介效果影響集體效能;此外任務相依性亦會調節尚嚴領導對團隊規範與集體效能間關係的中介效果。換言之,當任務相依性越高的情況下,尚嚴領導對對團隊規範與集體效能間的中介效果越顯著。最後,本研究結果能幫助理解與驗證教練威權領導中雙構面的影響效果,並擴展理論與實證研究上之不足外,對於實際在運動場域中教練威權領導的作用歷程與效能,提供一些啟發與實務應用。

    Authoritarian leadership is one of the important issues for the studies on the organization behaviors of Chinese leaderships. In sport situations, a sport team is similar to a small company. The coach is not only responsible for the competition results of the sport team, but also needs to show an outstanding capability and manner, so that positive atmosphere and discipline can be shown in the team. When the team is in some critical situations like the key point of winning the game, the coach should be able to make decisions and give the orders definitely, lead the team to be united, enhance working cooperatively, and improve performance, so that the team can escape from the bad situations and achieve the success. In this study, we aim to understand the effects of shang-yen and juan-chiuan leaderships of coaches on the performance of the sport teams, and further investigate the mediation effect of the team emotional atmosphere and norm on the team, and the adjustment effect of task dependency in the mediation mode. We adopt purposive sampling to select coaches and athletes from the sport teams of 24 domestic colleges and universities, with 174 sport teams, 174 coaches and 970 athletes, 1144 participants in total, as our research subjects. After all the collected data being checked and quantized, we adopt SPSS for Windows 20 and AMOS 21 statistics software to do the related examinations and analyses according to the research hypotheses. The research results show that, shang-yen and juan-chiuan leaderships have influences on collective efficacy in different ways, and affect collective efficacy via the mediation effect of positive team emotional atmosphere, and norm. Besides, task dependency also can adjust the mediation effect of shang-yen leadership on the relationship between team norm and collective efficacy. In other words, the higher the task dependency is, the more significant the mediation effect of shang-yen leadership on team norm and collective efficacy will be. Finally, in this study, the research results can help understand and validate the two-dimensional effect of the authoritarian leadership of coaches. Besides making up the inefficient parts between theoretical and experimental researches, the research results in this study can provide some inspirations and real applications on the operation process and effects of authoritarian leadership of the coaches in real sport fields.

    謝辭 i 中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 目次 v 表次 viii 圖次 x 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 9 第三節 研究問題 9 第四節 名詞操作性定義 9 第五節 研究重要性 11 第貳章 文獻探討 13 第一節 威權領導之理論與相關研究 13 第二節 集體效能之理論與相關研究 27 第三節 團隊情感氛圍之理論與相關研究 30 第四節 團隊規範之理論與相關研究 36 第五節 任務相依性之理論與相關研究 42 第六節 文獻總結 48 第參章 研究方法 52 第一節 研究架構 52 第二節 研究流程 53 第三節 研究樣本 54 第四節 研究工具 58 第五節 資料分析 63 第肆章 結果與討論 65 第一節 驗證性因素分析 65 第二節 描述性統計與相關分析 67 第三節 假設檢驗 69 第四節 討論 78 第伍章 結論與建議 90 第一節 結論 90 第二節 研究限制與未來研究建議 93 第三節 研究貢獻與實務意涵 95 參考文獻 98 附錄一、運動團隊教練意見調查 (預試問卷) 121 附錄二、運動團隊運動員意見調查 (預試問卷) 124 附錄三、運動團隊教練意見調查 (正式問卷) 129 附錄四、運動團隊運動員意見調查 (正式問卷一) 132 附錄五、運動團隊運動員意見調查 (正式問卷二) 136

    一、中文文獻
    中山大學企業管理學系 (2015)。管理學:整合觀點與創新思維。新北市:前程文化事業。
    王亞德 (2015)。專權領導、尚嚴領導對組織信任影響之研究。科技與人力教育季刊,2(2),30-45。
    王俊明 (2013)。教練領導行為及團隊動機氣候對球員自我效能及團隊集體效能的影響。運動與健康研究,2(2),13-30。
    王譯霆、鄭志富 (2017)。嚴師出高徒-家長式領導對競技啦啦隊團隊效能之影響。東海體育學報,1,21-28。
    任金剛、樊景立、鄭伯壎、周麗芳 (2003)。家長式領導:現代轉化及其影響機制 (計畫編號:89-H-FA01-2-4-4)。臺北市:教育部。
    吳宗祐 (2008)。主管威權領導與部屬的工作滿意度與組織承諾:信任的中介歷程與情緒智力的調節效果。本土心理學研究,30,3-63。
    吳宗祐、周麗芳、鄭伯壎 (2008)。主管的權威取向及其對部屬順從與畏懼的知覺對威權領導的預測效果。本土心理學研究,30,65-115。
    吳宗祐、徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎 (2002)。怒不可遏?或忍氣吞聲?華人企業中主管威權領導行為與部屬憤怒情緒反應的關係。本土心理學研究,19,3-49。
    吳宗祐、廖紘億 (2013)。華人威權領導總是導致部屬負面結果嗎?由「不確定管理理論」探討威權領導對分配不公平與程序不公平之交互作用與部屬工作滿意度之關係的調節效果。中華心理學刊,55(1),1-22。
    呂宛蓁、蕭嘉惠、許振明、曹校章、王學中 (2012)。臺灣體育運動學術研究的共同方法變異。大專體育學刊,14(4),419-427。
    宋一夫、湯慧娟 (2009)。高中甲組排球運動員知覺教練領導與教練效能對團隊氣氛之影響研究。臺灣運動心理學報,15,13-25。
    李宜蓁 (2006)。不同威權領導的負面效果:檢視部屬負面情感的中介角色 (未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。
    李炯煌 (2003)。教練領導行為與球員內在動機之相關研究。體育學報,34,123-134。
    李偉斌、簡晉龍 (2012)。雙元孝道的心理運作功能:對親子關係之影響暨教養行為之中介。教育與心理研究,35,55-84。
    周俊三 (2014)。家長式領導行為對賽前狀態性焦慮與團隊滿意度關係之研究。屏東科學體育學刊,3,41-55。
    周婉茹(2009)。專權與威權領導的效果:心理賦能的中介與仁慈領導的調節 (未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。
    周婉茹、周麗芳、鄭伯壎、任金剛 (2010)。專權與尚嚴之辨:再探威權領導的內涵與恩威並濟的效果。本土心理學研究,43,223-284。
    周婉茹、鄭伯壎 (2014a)。團隊中的差別對待:角色分化下的分隔與激勵效果。人力資源管理學報,14(4),1-29。
    周婉茹、鄭伯壎 (2014b)。掀開神秘的面紗:雙向度威權領導與工作績效。中華心理學刊,56(4),397-414。
    周婉茹、鄭伯壎、連玉輝 (2014)。威權領導:概念源起、現況檢討及未來方向。中華心理學刊,56(2),165-189。
    周學雰、黃英哲 (2007)。自我效能和集體效能:理論與研究回顧。國北教大體育,2,67-74。
    周麗芳、周婉茹、嚴珮瑜 (2011)。威權領導的前因與後果:主管與部屬間的壓力移轉。第七屆華人心理學家學術研討會,臺北市,臺灣。
    林子群、高三福 (2012)。教練家長式領導與球員同儕互動關係。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊,11(2),25-33。
    林夙豐、蘇秦玉 (2008)。教練領導風格對高中排球球員團隊承諾及滿意度影響之研究。運動與遊憩研究,2(3),37-49。
    林姿葶、何其霞 (2017)。工作團體多工作業多元性團體表現:團體時間規劃程度、任務相依性的調節式中介模式。人力資源管理學報,17(3),59-84。
    林姿葶、連玉輝 (2016)。運動情境中的家長式教練領導研究回顧。體育學報,49(2),125-142。
    林姿葶、鄭伯壎、周麗芳 (2014)。家長式領導:回顧與前瞻。本土心理學研究,42,3-82。
    林鉦棽、彭台光 (2012)。組織研究的中介檢測:緣起、爭議、研究設計和分析。管理學報,29(4),333-354。
    林澤民 (2012)。教練領導行為、團隊氣氛與團隊凝聚力之研究-以足球球員為例。運動教練科學,25,25-38。
    姜定宇、李威德 (2013)。團隊關係信念與團隊效能的關聯:團隊互依之調節效果。中華心理學刊,55(2),159-179。
    洪福源、黃德祥、鄭光燦、李介至 (2013)。校長轉型領導及教師自我效能之關係:團體凝聚力及教師集體效能之中介效果評估。屏東教育大學學報-教育類,40,215-242。
    紀乃文、陳建丞 (2011)。分店服務氣候、正向團隊情感氛圍、服務人員正向情緒表達與顧客購買決策關聯性之探討。組織與管理,4(1),129-162。
    胡凱揚、陳堅錐、黃致豪 (2012)。不同依賴程度之大專運動球員運動合作態度與團隊凝聚力之研究。嶺東學報,31,37-50。
    胡漢良、黃娟娟 (2012)。國小籃球教練家長式領導行為、球員參與動機對團隊效能之影響。高應科大體育,11,55-64。
    高三福 (2001)。團隊文化與教練領導:質化與量化兩種途徑研究 (未出版博士論文)。國立師範大學,臺北市。
    高三福、呂政達、楊鎮瑭 (2013)。家長式領導與信任教練:團隊價值觀的跨層次調節效果。體育學報,46,393-406。
    高三福、呂雲梅、顏肇庭、林子群 (2011)。競技啦啦隊之集體效能、動機氣候與團隊效能的關係。大專體育學刊,13(4),64-73。
    高三福、莊仲仁 (2009)。家長式領導、團隊社會化與團隊文化關係之研究:以運動團隊為例。應用心理研究,42,187-213。
    高三福、陳鈺芳 (2006)。運動教練的教誨領導:高中運動團隊的個案研究。大專體育學刊,8,97-111。
    高三福、簡曜輝、莊仲仁 (2002)。團隊文化的建構與內容:質化研究的途徑。大專體育學刊,4,23-33。
    高明峰 (2004)。不同高中職運動團隊之教練領導行為。花蓮師院學報 (教育類),18,215-224。
    康正男 (2006)。棒球總教練威權領導與球員效能之研究:職棒與業餘之比較。大專體育學刊,8(1),112-123。
    張文馨、陳思羽、季力康 (2012)。運動熱情與主觀幸福感的關係:正向情緒的中介效果。體育學報,45(4),301-309。
    張家銘、林素婷、黃國光、洪鯤豪 (2017)。大學運動員正向情緒感染力對訓練涉入、團隊正向情緒氛圍與團隊回復力之影響。運動休閒管理學報,14(4),31-47。
    張鼎乾、張智涵、游先進、林錫波 (2009)。柔道教練領導作風與領導效能之關係。北體學報,18,73-89。
    張寶誠 (2010)。管理淬煉。臺北市:中國生產力中心。
    戚樹誠 (2014)。組織行為學精華版。臺北市:雙葉書廊。
    許境頤、詹介云 (2014)。威權領導與情緒勞務之關聯研究。人力資源管理學報,14(4),31-55。
    許境頤、簡心潔 (2015)。部屬印象整飭策略對威權領導與知覺部屬順從的關聯性之中介效果:併論動機內化的調節角色。組織與管理,8(2),73-114。
    連巧婷 (2016)。專權領導與尚嚴領導對工作滿意度的影響—以工作敬業度為調節變項(未出版碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。
    郭均誠、林姿葶、周婉茹、鄭伯壎 (2015)。領導者之差序對待幅度與部屬效能:平均德行領導的調節效果。本土心理學研究,43,125-172。
    郭建志、蔡育菁 (2012)。組織挫折與職場退縮:主管不當督導與工作內外控之研究。中華心理學刊,54(3),293-313。
    陳世恩 (2004)。軍國民教育之體育思想形成。彰化師大體育學報,4,77-93。
    陳秀芬、黎正評 (2008)。凝聚力與集體效能對團隊運動表現之影響。2008 年國際體育運動與健康休閒發展趨勢研究會專刊,87-94。
    陳其昌 (2009)。大學運動員的運動目標取向和團隊規範對運動員精神的影響。大專體育學刊,11(1),43-56。
    陳羚 (2014)。負向團隊情感氛圍能促進團隊創新嗎?探討創新獎酬、團隊促進型焦點的干擾效果:多重研究與多重來源的檢視 (未出版碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。
    陳嵩、李佩芬、陳光偉 (2008)。上司家長式領導對銷售人員目標取向及績效之影響-以銀行理財專員為例。企業管理學報,77,1-46。
    陳銘薰、游淑萍 (2015)。工作價值觀、家長式領導與組織公民行為影響之研究。商管科技季刊,16(4),535~591。
    陳銘軍 (2011)。工作家庭增益的前置因素分析-真誠領導與正向團隊情感氛圍的跨層次中介模式 (未出版碩士論文)。國立東華大學,花蓮縣。
    陳龍弘、蔡英美、陳瓊茶 (2005)。家長式領導、負面情緒感受、離隊意圖和團隊滿意度之關係。國立體育學院論叢,15,205-216。
    陳優華、簡彩完 (2006)。高中運動代表隊成員知覺運動教練權威之研究。雲科大體育,9,87-99。
    彭台光、林鉦棽 (2008)。組織研究的中介檢測:緣起、爭議、研究設計和分析。管理學報,29(4),333-354。
    彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽 (2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報,23(1),77-98。
    曾秋美、王俊明 (2011)。家長式領導對大專體育科系運動代表隊團隊氣氛及競技倦怠的影響。長榮運動休閒學刊,5,93-112。
    曾建興、林彥伯 (2008)。家長式領導行為對大學棒球運動員運動倦怠之影響。北體學報,16,26-37。
    游鎮安、季力康 (2008)。探討正向情緒在運動中的角色:以廣建理論為基礎。大專體育, 99,142-146。
    湯慧娟、宋一夫 (2004)。教練家長式領導、團隊文化價值觀對團隊承諾之影響研究。體育學報,36,119-130。
    湯慧娟、宋一夫 (2009)。高中排球運動團隊家長式領導與轉型領導對團隊效能之研究。運動教練科學,16,79-90。
    湯慧娟、宋一夫(2010)。教練領導行為、情緒感受與運動員領導信任。臺大體育學報,18,45-55。
    黃家齊、黃荷婷 (2006)。團隊成員目標導向對於自我與集體效能及創新之影響一個多層次研究。管理學報,23(3),327-346。
    黃國恩、郭建志、鄭志富 (2019)。華人教練威權領導對教練效能知覺之影響:心理集體性中介效果的驗證。體育學報,52(1),109-125。
    黃敏萍 (2000)。跨功能任務團隊之結構與效能-任務性與社會系絡之影響 (未出版博士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。
    黃義翔、聶喬齡 (2015)。教練-球員關係在家長式領導行為與團隊凝聚力關係間的中介角色。大專體育學刊,17(2),203-219。
    黃鈴雯、廖主民 (2017)。運動員的公平知覺與集體效能:對教練信任感之中介角色。大專體育學刊,19(2),134-147。
    楊坤芳 (2011)。大專籃球球員教練領導行為與運動團隊規範之研究。雲科大體育,13, 125-135。
    楊國樞 (1993)。傳統價值觀與現代價值觀能否同時並存。載於楊國樞、余安邦 (主編):中國人的價值觀--社會科學觀點。臺北市:桂冠圖書。
    楊慶麟、蔡素惠 (2016)。國小校長中西領導模式與學校效能關係之研究:以結構方程式驗證為例。學校行政,106,27-51。
    溫福星、邱皓政 (2009)。多層次模型方法論:階層線性模式的關鍵議題與試解。臺大管理論叢,19(2),263-293。
    趙安安、高尚仁 (2005)。台灣地區華人企業家長式領導風格與員工壓力之關聯。應用心理研究,27,111-131。
    劉娜婷、蔡秉毅、徐雅惠、吳肇展 (2014)。權威領導與職場偏差行為之關係:主管與部屬交換關係差異與個人文化價值觀所扮演的角色。組織與管理,7(2),1-50。
    劉琪 (2003)。大學運動員心理技能應用情形之分析-以台灣體育學院為例。臺灣運動心理學報,3,21-42。
    劉義傳、王清欉、黃崇儒 (2013)。高中棒球球員心理堅韌性、教練威權領導與競技倦怠的關係。臺灣運動教育學報,8(1),1-14。
    劉錦雲 (2012)。團隊教練、團隊運作過程與團隊效能關係之研究-以團隊省思為干擾效果 (未出版博士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。
    樊景立、鄭伯壎 (2000)。華人組織的家長式領導:一項文化觀點的分析。本土心理學研究,13,126-180。
    蔡守浦、張志成、黃宏春 (2002)。不同目標設定與類型對目標承諾與集體效能之影響。大專體育學術專刊 (上),260-270。
    蔡英美(2005a)。家長式領導三元模式的主要效果與互涉作用對運動團隊滿意度的預測。輔仁大學體育學刊,4,99-108。
    蔡英美(2005b)。家長式領導、情緒感受與團隊凝聚力之關係研究。國立體育學院論叢,16(2),347-358。
    蔡英美、王俊明 (2008)。大專甲組球員知覺的家長式領導、情緒感受、團隊承諾及團隊凝聚力之研究。文化體育學刊,6,91-99。
    蔡維奇、紀乃文 (2008)。團隊情感氛圍形成的前因、情境調節及個人層次後果變項之研究。組織與管理,1(1),1-37。
    鄭志富 (1997)。運動教練領導行為研究取向。中華體育,11(1),22-31。
    鄭志富、張琪、王豐家、黃國恩 (2019)。華人運動團隊差序式領導模式之建構。體育學報,52(2),223-240。
    鄭伯壎 (1991)。家族主義與領導行為。見楊中芳、高尚仁 (主編)。中國人、中國心-人格與社會篇,365-408。臺北市:遠流。
    鄭伯壎 (1993)。家長權威價值與領導行為之關係探討 (計畫編號:NSC82-0301-H002-029)。臺北市:國科會。
    鄭伯壎 (1995)。家長權威與領導行為之關係:一個台灣民營企業主持人的個案研究。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,79,119-173。
    鄭伯壎(2005)。華人領導-理論與實際。臺北市:桂冠圖書。
    鄭伯壎 (2007)。家長式領導三元模式:現代轉化及其影響機制 (4/4) -家長式領導與部屬效能:部屬情感與心理反應之中介模式 (計畫編號:NSC96-2413-H-002-003-PAE)。臺北市:國科會。
    鄭伯壎 (2017)。華人領導的十堂必修課。臺北市:五南圖書。
    鄭伯壎、周麗芳、黃敏萍、樊景立、彭泗清 (2003)。家長式領導的三元模式:中國大陸企業組織的證據。本土心理學研究,20,209-250。
    鄭伯壎、周麗芳、樊景立 (2000)。家長式領導:三元模式的建構與測量。本土心理學研究,14,3-64。
    鄭伯壎、樊景立、周麗芳 (2006)。家長式領導:模式與證據。臺北市:華泰文化。
    鄭秀貴、高麗娟 (2008)。威權、仁慈、德行家長式領導:李瑞麟教練之個案研究。北體學報,16,157-170。
    鄭昱宏、周婉茹、周德賢、鄭伯壎 (2019)。教練威權領導一定不好嗎?一項權變概念的提出與驗證。中華心理學刊,61(2),97-130。
    黎苑均、徐均宏、白瑞聰 (2016)。從領導方式觀點解析健康促進學校推動團隊之集體效能及其團體效果-以新竹縣市國中為例。健康管理學刊,14(1),67-98。
    賴素玲、古國宏 (2015)。台灣大專網球球員在不同條件的工作團隊氣氛和社會團隊氣氛之分析。屏東科大體育學刊,4,41-51。
    薛名淳、胡崇偉、鄭家惠、林明佳 (2012)。傅柯觀點:運動中的學長制與權力。運動研究,21(2),59-72。
    謝宛君、高三福、呂雲梅 (2008)。教練威權領導的比較與省思。中華體育季刊,22(3),67-72。
    簡晉龍、黃囇莉 (2015)。華人權威取向之內涵與形成歷程。本土心理學研究,43,55-123。
    顏肇廷、曾冠堯、高三福 (2008)。運動團隊家長式領導研究之探討。中華體育季刊,22(4),96-102。
    二、英文文獻
    Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 191-201.
    Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 16(1), 74-94.
    Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Bandura, A. (1990). Perceived self-efficacy in the exercise of personal agency. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2, 128-163.
    Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
    Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentive perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
    Barsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. E. (2012). Group affect: Its influence on individual and group outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(2), 119–123.
    Bartel, C. A., & Saavedra, R. (2000). The collective construction of work group moods. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 197-231.
    Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 587-595.
    Birenbaum. A., & Sagarin. E. (1976). Norms and human behavior. New York: Praeger.
    Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002). Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual Review Psychology, 53, 279-307.
    Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258.
    Bushnell, D. S. (1990). Input, process, output: A model for evaluating training. Training and Development Journal, 3, 41-43.
    Chan, S. C. H., Huang, X., Snape, E., & Lam, C. K. (2013). The Janus face of paternalistic leaders: Authoritarianism, benevolence, subordinates’ organization- based self-esteem, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), 108-128.
    Chatman, J. A., & Flynn, F. J. (2001). The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Academv of Management Journal, 44(5), 956-974.
    Chen, T. T. (2011). Structuring versus autocraticness: Exploring a comprehensive model of authoritarian leadership. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of Hong Kong.
    Chen, C. C., & Farh, J. L. (2010). Developments in understanding Chinese leadership: Paternalism and its elaborations, moderations, and alternatives. In Bond, M. H. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 599-622). New York: Oxford University Press.
    Chen, G., & Bliese, P. D. (2002). The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 549-556.
    Chen, X. P., Eberly, M. B., Chiang, T. J., Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2014). Affective trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of Management, 40(3), 796-819.
    Chen, X., Lam, S. S. K., Naumann, S. E., & Schaubroeck, J. (2005). Group citizenship behavior: Conceptualization and preliminary tests of its antecedents and consequences. Management and Organization Review, 1(2), 273-300.
    Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., & Farh, J. L. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 89-117.
    Chi, N. W., Chung, Y. Y., & Tsai, W. C. (2011). How do happy leaders enhance team success? The mediating roles of transformational leadership, group affective tone and team processes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(6), 1421–1454.
    Chiang, T. J., Wang, A. C., Chen, X. P., & Cheng, B. S. (2009). CEO authoritarian leadership in China: Exploring its effects on employee and organizational performance. Paper presented at the academy of management 2009 annual meeting, Chicago, IL.
    Chou, L. F., & Cheng, B. S. (2007). Does globalization matter? The change of power distance and its effects on authoritative leadership in business and military organizations in Taiwan. Paper presented at the international conference on globalization and development in Chinese economic region, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Chou, W. J., Chou, L. F., & Cheng, B. S. (2010). Authoritarian leadership and subordinate well-being: How and when does leadership function? Paper presented at the academy of management 2010 annual meeting, Montréal, CA.
    Cole, S. M., Walter, F., & Bruch, H. (2008). Affective mechanisms linking dysfunctional behavior to performance in work teams: A moderated mediation study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 945-958.
    Collins, A., Lawrence, S. A., Troth, A. C., & Jordan, P. J. (2013). Group affective tone: A review and future research directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 43-62.
    Cox, R. H. (1990). Sport psychology: Concepts and applications (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
    Cummings, T. G. (1978). Self-regulating work groups: A socio-technical synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 3, 625-634.
    Dasborough, M. T., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2002). Emotion and attribution of intentionality in leader-member relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(5), 615-634.
    Davidson, F. J. (1994) .The new project management: Tools for an age of rapid change, corporate reengineering, and other business realities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Press.
    Devine, D. J., & Philips, J. L. (2001). Do smarter teams do better: A meta-analysis of cognitive ability and team performance. Small Group Research, 32(5), 507-532.
    Deyo, F. C. (1983). Chinese management practices and work commitment in comparative perspective. In Gosling, L. A. P., & Lim, L. Y. C. (Eds.), The Chinese in Southeast Asia: identity, culture and politics (Vol. 2, pp. 215-230). Singapore: Maruzen Asia.
    Diefendorff, J. M., Croyle, M. H., & Gosserand, R. H. (2005). The dimensionality and antecedents of emotional labor strategies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 339-357.
    Dollard, J., Doob, L., Miller, N., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1-22.
    Erez, A., Misangyi, V. F., Johnson, D. E., LePine, M. A., & Halverson, K. C. (2008). Stirring the hearts of followers: Charismatic leadership as the transferal of affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 602–616.
    Fitness, J. (2000). Anger in the workplace: An emotional script approach to anger episodes between workers and their superiors, co-workers and subordinates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 147-162.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
    Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broadenand-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226.
    Frijda, N. H. (1999). Well-being the foundations of hedonic psychology. In emotions and hedonic experience. In Kahneman, E. D., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.) (PP. 190-210). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107-116.
    George, J. M. (1995). Leader positive mood and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 778-794.
    George, J. M. (1996). Group affective tone. In M. A. West (Eds.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 77-93). Chicester, UK: Wiley.
    George, J. M. (2000). Emotions and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence. Human Relations, 53(8), 1027-1055.
    George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310-329.
    Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. The Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183–211.
    Glick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. The Academy of Management Review, 10, 601-616.
    Graen, G. (1976). Role-making processes within complex organizations. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1201-1245). Chicago: Rand McNally.
    Greenlees, I., Graydon, J., & Maynard, I. (2000). The impact of individual efficacy beliefs on group goal selection and group goal commitment. Journal of Sport Sciences, 18, 451-459.
    Gruenfeld, D. H., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2010). Organizational preferences and their consequences. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed.) (pp. 1252-1287). New York: Wiley.
    Gundlach, M., Zivnuska S., & Stoner, J. (2006). Understanding the relationship between individualism-collectivism and team performance through an integration of social identity theory and the social relations model. Human Relations, 59(12), 1603-1632.
    Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in group: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychological Society, 32, 87-106.
    Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279.
    Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 269-287.
    Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression‐based approach. New York, NY: Guilford.
    Heuze, J. P., Sarrazin, P., Masiero, M., Raimbault, N., & Thomas, J. P. (2006). The relationships of perceived motivational climate to cohesion and collective efficacy in elite female teams. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 18, 201-218.
    Higgs, M., Plewnia, U. & Ploch, J. (2005). Influnce of team composition of task complexity on team performance. Team Performance Management, 11(7/8), 227-250.
    Ho, D. Y. F. (1996). Filial piety and its psychological consequences. In Bond, M. H. (Ed.), Handbook of Chinese psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
    Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    Hogg, M. A. (2003). Social identity. In Leary, M. R., & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (PP. 462-479). New York, NY: Guilford.
    Huang, K. E., & Cheng, C, F. (2019, August). The influence of authoritarian leadership of Chinese coaches on sports teams performance: A verification of the mediating effect on the perception of team norm. Paper presented at the 2019 Asian association of sport management conference, Tokyo, Japan.
    Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organization: From input-processoutput models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543.
    Jackson, C. L., Colquitt, J. A., Wesson, M. J., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2006). Psychological collectivism: a measurement validation and linkage to group member performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 884-899.
    James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2), 219-229.
    James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., &Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85-98.
    Jehn, K. A. (1995). Amultimethod examination of the benefits and determents of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256-282.
    Joshi, A., & Roh, H. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 599-627.
    Joyner, K., & Mummery, K. (2005). Influences on sportspersonship orientations: Contextual and motivational. Youth Studies Australia, 24(1), 48-53.
    Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28(2), 107-128.
    Kelly, J. R., & Barsade, S. G. (2001). Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 99-130.
    Keshtan, M. H., Ramzaninezhard, R., Kordshooli, S. S., & Oanahi, P. M. (2010). The relationship between collective efficacy and coaching behaviors in professional volleyball league of Iran clubs. World Journal of Sport Sciences, 3(1), 1-6.
    Kiazad, K., Restubog, S. L. D., Zagenczyk, T. J., Kiewitz, C., & Tang, R. L. (2010). In pursuit of power: The role of authoritarian leadership in the relationship between supervisors’ Machiavellianism and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervisory behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(4), 512-519.
    Kim, M. S. (1995). Performance norms and performance by teams in basketball competition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80(3), 770.
    Kim, M. S. (2001). Satisfaction and perception of performance norms of sport teams. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 92(3), 1202-1204.
    Kim, M., & Shin, Y. (2015). Collective efficacy as a mediator between cooperative group norms and group positive affect and team creativity. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(3), 693-716.
    King, A. Y. (1996). The transformation of Confucianism in the post-confucian era: The emergence of rationalistic traditionalism in Hong Kong. In W. M. Tu (Ed.), Confucian traditions in East Asian modernity: Moral education and economic culture in Japan and the other four Mini-Dragons. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
    Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. J. (2000). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
    Klep, A., Wisse, B., & Van der Flier, H. (2011). Interactive affective sharing versus non-interactive affective sharing in work groups: Comparative effects of group affect on work group performance and dynamics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(3), 312–323.
    Knight, D., Durham C. C., & Locke, E. A. (2001). The relationship of team goals, incentives, and efficacy to strategic risk, tactical implement, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 326-338.
    LeUnes, A. D., & Nation, J. R. (1989). Sport psychology. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
    Lewis, K. M. (2000). When leader display emotion: gow followers respond to negative emotional expression of male and female leader. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 221-234.
    Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2006). Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(6), 723-746.
    Lindsley, D. H., Brass, D. J., & Thomas, J. B. (1995). Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 645-678.
    Mannix, E., & Neale, M. A. (2005). What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(2), 31-55.
    Mason, C. M., & Griffin, M. A. (2003). Group task satisfaction: The group’s shared attitudes to its task and work environment. Group & Organization Management, 30(6), 625-652.
    Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273-283.
    McGrath, J. E. (1984). Group interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Mischel, L. J., & Northcraft, G. B. (1997). “I think we can…”: The role of efficacy beliefs in group and team effectiveness. Advances in Group Process, 14, 177-197.
    Molnar, D. S., Reker, D. L., Culp, N. A., Sadava, S. W., & DeCourville, N. H. (2006). A mediated model of perfectionism, affect, and physical health. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 482-500.
    Moritz, S. E., Feltz, D. L., Fahrbach, K. R., & Mack, D. E. (2000). The relationship of self- efficacy measures to sport performance: A meta-analytic review. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 280-294.
    Muczyk, J. P., & Reimann, B. C. (1987). The case for directive leadership. Academy of Management Executive, 1, 301-311.
    Nixon, Ⅱ, H. L. (1993). Accepting the risks of pain and injury in sport: Mediated cultural influences on playing hurt. Sociology of Sport Journal, 10, 183-196.
    Oatley, K., & Jenkins, J. M. (1996). Understanding emotions. Cambridge. MA: Blackwell.
    Onağa, Z., & Tepeci, M. (2014). Team effectiveness in sport teams: The effects of team cohesion, intra team communication and team norms on team member satisfaction and intent to remain. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150(15), 420-428.
    O'Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (1996). Culture as social control: corporations, cults and commitment. In Staw, B., & Cummings, L. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 157-200. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    Patterson, M. M., Carron, A. V., & Loughead, T. M. (2005). The influence of team norms on the cohesion–self-reported performance relationship: A multi-level analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6, 479–493.
    Pearce, J. L., & Greger sen, H. B. (1991). Task interdependence and extra-role behavior: A test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 838-844.
    Pellegrini, E. K., Scandura, T. A., & Jayaraman, V. (2010). Cross-cultural generalizability of paternalistic leadership: An expansion of leader-member exchange theory. Group & Organization Management, 35(4), 391-420.
    Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podaskoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
    Prapavessis, H., Carron, A. V. (1997). Sacrifice, cohesion, and conformity to norms in sport teams. Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice, 1(3), 231-240.
    Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185-227.
    Pye, L. W. (1985). Asia power and politics: The cultural dimensions of authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Ravlin, E. C., & Meglino, B. M. (1987). Effect of values on perceptions and decision making: A study of alternative work values measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72 (4): 666-673.
    Redding, S. G. (1990). The spirit of Chinese capitalism. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    Rhee, S. Y. (2007). Shared emotions and group effectiveness the role of broadening-and-building interactions. In Mannix, E. A., Neale, M. A., & Anderson, C.P. (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (pp. 65-95). CT: JAI Press.
    Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organization behavior: Concepts, controversies, and applications (8th ed). Pretice Hall.
    Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2015). Organizational behavior (16th ed.). Foundations of group behavior (pp. 274-290). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Ronayne, L.S. (2004). Effects of coaching behaviors on team dynamics: How coaching behaviors, influence team cohesion and collective efficacy over the course of a season. M.S in sport studies, physical education, health and sport studies. Miami University.
    Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C., & Van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 61-72.
    Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224-253.
    Schaubroeck, J., & Lam, S. S. K. (2002). How similarity to peers and supervisor influences organizational advancement in different cultures. Academy of Management. Journal, 45 (6), 1120-1136.
    Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D. N., Koopman P. L., & Wienk, J. A. (2003). Diversity and team outcomes: The moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(6), 779-802.
    Schwarz, N., & Clore, G.L. (2003). Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychological Inquiry, 14(3/4), 296-303.
    Schwartz, S. H., & Howard, J. A., (1982). Helping and cooperation: A self-based motivational model. In Derlega, V. J., & Grzelak, J. (Eds.), Cooperation and helping behavior: Theories and research (pp. 327-353). New York: Academic press.
    Sears, D. O., Peplau, L. A., Freedman, J. L., & Taylor, S. E. (1988). Social psychology (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Shea, G. P., & Guzzo, R. A. (1987). Group as human resources. In Rowland, K. R., & Ferris, G. R. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (5th ed., pp. 323-356). Greenwich, CR: JAI Press.
    Sherony, K. M., & Green, S. G. (2002). Coworker exchange: Relationships between coworkers, leadermember exchange, and work attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 542-548.
    Shields, D., Bredemeier, B., Gardner, D., & Bostrom, A. (1995). Leadership, cohesion, and team norms regarding cheatingand aggression. Sociology of Sport Journal, 12, 324-336.
    Short, S. E., Sullivan, P., & Feltz, L. D. (2005). Development and preliminary validation of the collective efficacy questionnaire for sports. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 9(3), 181–202.
    Shurr, K. T., Ashley, M. A., & Joy, K. L. (1977). A multivariate analysis of male athlete characteristics: sport type and success. Multivariate Experimental Clinical Research, 3, 53-68.
    Silin, R. F. (1976). Leadership and values. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Slater, P. E. (1965). Role differentiation in small groups. In Hare, A. P. Borgatta, E. F., & Bales, R. F. (Eds.), Small groups: Studies in social interaction (PP. 610-627). New York: Knopf.
    Smith, R. E., & Smoll F. L (1997). Coach-madiated team building in youth sports. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 9, 114-132.
    Smith, P. A. (1997). A study of the relationship between teacher’s perceptions of the leadership behaviors of principals and the organizational climate in secondary schools of the Alabama. The University of Alabama doctoral dissertation.
    Solomon, G.B. (2004). A lifespan view of moral development in physical activity. In M.R.Weiss (Ed.), Developmental sport and exercise psychology: A lifespan perspective (pp. 453-474). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
    Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483-504.
    Stajkovic, A. D., Lee, D., & Nyberg, A. J. (2009). Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: Meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 814-828.
    Stewart, G. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32(1), 29-55.
    Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43,135-148.
    Suhr, J. A., & Tsanadis, J. (2007). Affect and personality correlation of the Iowa Gambling task. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(1), 27-36.
    Sy, T., Cote, S., & Saavedra, R. (2005). The contagious leader: Impact of the leader’s mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 295-305.
    Taggar, S., & Ellis, R. (2007). The role of leaders in shaping formal team norms. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(2), 105–120.
    Tepper, B. J., Henle, C. A., Lambert, L. S., Giacalone, R. A., & Duffy, M. K. (2008). Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 721-732.
    Totterdell, P. (2000). Catching moods and hitting runs: Mood linkage and subjective performance in professional sport teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 848-859.
    Vallerand, R. J., Deshaies, P., & Cuerrier, J. P. (1997). On the effects of the social context on behavioral intentions of sportsmanship. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 28, 126-140.
    Van der Vegt, G. S., & Janssen, O. (2003). Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. Journal of Management, 29(5), 729-751.
    Wageman, R., & Baker, G. (1997). Incentives and cooperation: The joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 139-158.
    Watson, D., Clark, L., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
    Watson, C. B., Chemers, M. M., & Preiser, N. (2001). Collective efficacy: A multilevel analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(8), 1057-1068.
    Weinberg, R. S., & Gould, D. (1999). Foundations of sport and exercise psychology (2nd Ed). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Westre, K. R., & Weiss, M. R., (1991). The relationship between perceived coaching behaviors and group cohesion high school football teams. Sport Psychologist, 5(1), 41-54.
    Westwood, R. I. (1997). Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for “paternalistic headship” among the overseas Chinese. Organization Studies, 18(3), 445-480.
    Westwood, R. I., & Chan, A. (1992). Headship and leadership. In R. I. Westwood (Ed.), Organizational behavior: A Southeast Asian perspective. Hong Kong: Longman.
    Whiteoak, J. W., Chalip, L., & Hort, L. K. (2004), Assessing group efficacy: Comparing three methods of measurement. Small Group Research, 35, 158-173.
    Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In Staw, B. M., & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 20, 77-140. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
    Wu, M., & Xu, E. (2012). Paternalistic leadership: From here to where? In X. Huang & M. H. Bond (Eds.), Handbook of Chinese organizational behavior: Integrating theory, research and practice (pp. 449-466). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
    Yang, K. S. (1998). Chinese responses to modernization: A psychological analysis. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1(1), 75-97.
    Yukelson, D. (1997). Principles of effective team buiding interventions in sport: A direct services approach at Penn State University. Journal of Applied Sports Psychology, 9, 73-96.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE