簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 胡慧兒
Hui-er Hu
論文名稱: 台灣高職學生英語後設認知閱讀策略使用探究
An Investigation of Taiwanese Vocational High School Students' Use of Metacognitive Reading Strategies
指導教授: 陳秋蘭
Chen, Chiou-Lan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 101
中文關鍵詞: 後設認知閱讀策略閱讀能力高職學生閱讀策略
英文關鍵詞: Metacognitive reading strategies, reading proficiency, vocational high school students, reading strategies
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:118下載:59
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討台灣高職學生的英文後設認知閱讀策略,以及與英文閱讀能力之間的關係。台灣北部某高職194位學生參加本項研究。藉由一份修改自Mokhtari & Sheorey(2002)的閱讀策略問卷,以及全民英檢中級的閱讀能力測驗為主要實驗工具,研究者能回答研究問題。主要的研究發現如下:
    1.大致來說,台灣高職學生使用英語後設認知閱讀策略的頻率為中等。
    2.就三種英語後設認知閱讀策略而言,高職學生最常使用問題解決策略,接著是支持性策略,而最少使用的是整體性閱讀策略。
    3.問題解決策略和學生的字彙與結構,克漏字,以及閱讀測驗的表現均達顯著相關。
    4.朗讀是最少被使用的策略,但此策略和學生整體閱讀能力達顯著相關,並且也是分辨高低分組學生之重要策略。
    5.英文閱讀能力較高的學生和較低的學生,在後設認知閱讀策略的使用上的確有所不同,特別是在問題解決策略的使用方面更是如此。閱讀能力較低的學生常使用翻譯的策略,但這卻和他們的閱讀能力呈現負相關。
    根據以上的結果,研究者建議語言教學者應將策略教學融入於課程中,如此一來可讓學習者意識到閱讀策略的存在,並能立刻做練習,漸漸能成為有策略的讀者,並且能夠掌管自己的閱讀過程。此外,教師亦可藉由訓練朗讀的方式幫助學生理解文章。最後,學生在翻譯策略的使用上亦應謹慎,以避免過度依賴此項策略。

    The study investigates Taiwanese vocational high school students’ use of metacognitive reading strategies, and their relationship with students’ performance on reading proficiency tests. A total 194 participants from a vocational high school in northern Taiwan joined the study. By adopting a modified Survey of Reading Strategy (M-SORS) questionnaire from Mokhtari & Sheorey (2002), and a reading proficiency test in the intermediate level of General English Proficiency Test, the researcher was able to answer the research questions of the present study. Major findings are as follows:
    1. Generally speaking, Taiwanese vocational high school students used metacognitive reading strategies at medium level.
    2. Among the three groups of metacognitive reading strategies, vocational high school students tended to rely on problem solving strategies the most, followed by support strategies, and global reading strategies.
    3. Problem solving strategies were proven to significantly correlate with students’ performance on vocabulary and structure, cloze, and reading comprehension test.
    4. Reading aloud was the least used metacognitive reading strategy by all participants. However, it was found to correlate significantly with learners’ overall reading proficiency. In addition, it was a crucial strategy that distinguished high proficiency learners from low ones.
    5. There was a significant difference between high and low reading proficiency learners’ use of metacognitive reading strategies, especially in the use of problem solving strategies. Low achievers’ frequent use of translation method was found to negatively correlate to their reading performance.
    The findings of this study re-iterated the importance of reading strategy instruction. Language teachers should incorporate the teaching of reading strategies into curriculum to raise students’ awareness, and provide opportunities for hands-on practice. Through reading strategy instruction, students can become strategic readers and are able to govern their reading process. In addition, language teachers can train students to read aloud to improve their reading comprehension. Finally, translation should be used with caution so as not to cause students’ over dependence on this strategy.

    CHINESE ABSTRACT.........................................i ENGLISH ABSTRACT........................................ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT.........................................iv TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................v LIST OF TABLES........................................viii LIST OF FIGURES..........................................x CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION............................1 Background and Motivation............................1 Research Questions...................................4 Significance of the Study............................4 Organization of the Thesis...........................5 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW........................7 Learning Strategy....................................7 Language Learning Strategies.........................8 Instruments Developed to Measure Language Learning Strategies...............................................11 Studies on Language Learning Strategies..............11 Studies on Reading and Reading Strategies............13 Metacognition........................................15 Taxonomy of Metacognition............................16 Metacognition and Reading............................19 Instruments Developed for Measuring Metacognitive Reading Strategy Use.....................................21 Studies on Learners’ Metacognitive Reading Strategy Use 23 Summary..............................................28 CHAPTER THREE METHOD..................................29 Participants.........................................29 Instruments..........................................30 Modified Survey of Reading Strategies (M-SORS).......30 Pilot Study for Testing the M-SORS...................31 English Reading Proficiency Test.....................32 Piloting English Reading Proficiency Test............34 Procedure............................................35 Data Analysis........................................36 CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS.................................37 Metacognitive Reading Strategies Used by Vocational High School Students.....................................38 The Frequency of Use of Overall Metacognitive Reading Strategies...............................................39 The Frequency of Use of Individual Strategies........39 The Frequency of Use of Three Categories of Metacognitive Reading Strategies.........................41 Problem Solving Strategies (PROB)....................42 Support Strategies (SUP).............................44 Global Reading Strategies (GLOB).....................46 The Top Eleven Most Frequently Used Metacognitive Reading Strategies.......................................48 The Ten Least Frequently Used Metacognitive Reading Strategies...............................................50 The Relationship between Metacognitive Reading Strategy Use and Students’ Performance on Reading Proficiency Test.....................................................53 Strategy Use and Reading Proficiency Test............53 Individual Strategy Use and the Reading Proficiency Test.....................................................54 Overall Strategy Use and the Three Subtests of the Reading Proficiency Test.................................56 Three Categories of Metacognitive Reading Strategies and Three Subtests of the Reading Proficiency Test.......57 Individual Strategy Use and Vocabulary and Structure Section..................................................57 Individual Strategy Use and Cloze Section............59 Individual Strategy Use and Reading Comprehension Section..................................................60 High and Low Reading Proficiency Learners’ Use of Metacognitive Reading Strategies.........................61 Overall Strategy Use between High and Low Reading Proficiency Students.....................................62 Strategy Category Use between High and Low Reading Proficiency Group........................................63 Ten Most Frequently Used Metacognitive Reading Strategies by High and Low English Reading Proficiency Students.................................................63 Ten Least Frequently Used Metacognitive Reading Strategies by High and Low English Reading Proficiency Students.................................................66 Individual Strategies Used Significantly Different by High and Low Reading Proficiency Learners................68 Summary..............................................71 CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION................72 Major Findings of the Present Study..................72 The Preference in the Use of Problem Solving Strategies 74 The Importance of Reading Aloud......................75 The Impact of Doing Translation......................75 Pedagogical Implications.............................76 The Use of Reading Aloud.............................77 Be Cautious About Applying Translation...............78 Direct Teaching of Metacognitive Reading Strategies..79 Limitations of the present study and Suggestions for future research..........................................81 Conclusion...........................................82 REFERENCES...............................................84 APPENDIX 1: Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS) by Mokhtari & Sheorey (2002).........................................96 Appendix 2: Unmodified SORS..............................98 Appendix 3: Modified- Survey of Reading Strategy (M-SORS)100

    Alderson, J. C. (2001). Assessing reading. UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Alderson, J.C. (1984). Reading in a foreign language: A reading problem or a language problem? In J. C. Alderson & A. H. Urquhart (Eds.), Reading in a foreign language. New York: Lonman.
    Anderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. ERIC Digest EDO. Washington. DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on languages and linguistics.
    Anderson, N. J. (2003). Scrolling, clicking, and reading English: Online reading strategies in a second/ foreign language. The Reading Matrix, 3 (3), 1-33.
    Anderson, N. J. (2005). L2 learning strategies. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 757-772). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Anderson, N. J. (2008). Active skills for reading: Book three. Singapore: Thomson.
    Baker, L. (2001). Metacognition in comprehension instruction. In Block, C. & Pressley, M. (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research based best practices (pp. 274-289). New York: Guilford.
    Baker, W. & Boonkit, K. (2004). Learning strategies in reading and writing: EAP contexts. Regional Language Centre Journal, 35 (3), 299-328.
    Barnett, M. (1988). Reading through context: How real and perceived strategy use affects L2 comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 72, 150-162.
    Bauserman, K. L. (2005). Metacognitive processes inventory as informal instrument to assess a student’s developmental level of metacognition. In Israel, S.E. (Eds.), Metacognition in literacy learning (pp. 165-180). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Block, C. C. & Pressley, M. (2002). Comprehension instruction: Research based approach. New York: Guilford.
    Block, C. C. (2002). Literacy difficulties: Diagnosis and instruction for reading specialist and classroom teachers. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    Block, C. C. (2004). Teaching comprehension: The comprehension process approach. Boston: Pearson Education.
    Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 463-494.
    Brown, A. & Palinscar, S. (1982). Including strategic learning from text by means of informed self-control training. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2, 1-17.
    Buttler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281.
    Cain, K. (1996). Story knowledge and comprehension skill. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties (pp. 167-192). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    Carrell, P. L. (1988a). Introduction: Interactive approaches to second language reading. In P.L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Esdey (Eds.), Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading (pp.1-7). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Carrell, P. L., Pharis, B. G., & Liberto, J. C. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 23 (4), 647-678.
    Carrell, P. L. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. Modern Language Journal, 73, 121-134.
    Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112-130.
    Chiang, T. H. (2010). A study of EFL reading strategies used by senior high school students on national Yuan Li senior high school. Unpublished master’s thesis. Kaohsiung: National Kaohsiung Normal University.
    Cohen, A. D., Oxford, R. L., & Chi, J. C. (2002). Language Strategy Use Survey. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, University of Minnesota.
    Cubukcu, F. (2008). Enhancing vocabulary development and reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. Issues in Education Research, 18 (1), 1-11.
    Day, R. R., and Bamford, J. (2002). Top ten principles for teaching extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14, 136-141.
    Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
    Flavell, J. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 21-29). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (1996). Guided Reading: Good First Teaching for All Children, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    Garner, R. (1988). Metacognition and Reading Comprehension. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
    Gass, S. & Selinker, L. (2001) Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Grabe, W. (2004). Research on teaching reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 44-49.
    Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Harlow, England: Pearson Education.
    Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies: L2 Proficiency and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 261-297.
    Griffiths, C. & Parr, J. M. (2001). Language-learning strategies: theory and perception. EFL Journal, 55 (3), 247-254.
    Ho, P. Y. (2007). A study of EFL reading strategies used by vocational high school in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis. Taipei: National Taiwan University of Science and Technology.
    Hsiao, T. Y., & Oxford, R. L. (2002). Comparing theories of language learning strategies: A confirmatory factor analysis. Modern Language Journal, 86, 368-383.
    Huang, H. C., Chern, C. L., Lin, C. C. (2006). EFL learners' online reading strategies: A comparison between high and low EFL proficient readers. English Teaching and Learning, 2006 Special Issue (1), 1-22.
    Huang, H. C., Chern, C. L., Lin, C. C. (2009). EFL learners’ use of online reading strategies and comprehension of texts: An expository study. Computer & Education, 52 (1), 13-26.
    Hudson, T. (2007). Teaching second language reading. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
    Hung, H. C. (1990). The effects of sex and language material styles on reading strategies of senior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished master thesis Kaohsiung: National Kaohsiung Normal University.
    Hung, H. P. (2005). An investigation of factors that influence EFL college students’ reading strategy use. Unpublished master thesis. Changhua: National Changhua Normal University.
    Ilustre, C. A. P. (2011). Beliefs about reading, metacognitive reading strategies and text comprehension among college students in a private university. Philippine ESL Journal, 7, 28-47.
    Jiménez, R.T., García, G.E., & Pearson, P.D. (1996). The reading strategies of bilingual Latino/a students who are successful English readers: Opportunities and obstacles. Reading Research Journal, 27, 427-71.
    Jimenez, V. et. al. (2009). Measuring metacognitive strategies using the reading awareness scale ESCOLA. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7 (2), 779-804.
    Karper, G. D., Mahlobo, E. B., and Lemmer, E. M. (2003). The relationship between standardized test performance and language learning strategies in English second language: A case study. Journal of Language Teaching, 37 (2), 164-178.
    Kaur, M. & Embi, M. A. (2011). The Relationship between Language Learning Strategies and Gender among Primary School Students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1 (10), 1432-1436
    Kozminsky, E & Kozminsky, L. (2001). How do general knowledge and reading strategies ability relate to reading comprehension of high school students at different educational levels? Journal of Research in Reading, 24 (2), 187-204.
    Laufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition, (pp. 20-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Lawrence, L. J. (2007). Cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies revisited: Implications for instruction. The Reading Matrix, 7 (3), 55-71.
    Layton, K. (1983). A correlational study of the Relationship between Cloze Procedures and Standardized Reading Tests for Intermediate Grades. Master Thesis. Southwest Missouri State University.
    Lee, M. L., & Liao, H. C. (2007). Investigating the effect of English reading proficiency level of EFL college freshmen on the selection of metacognitive strategies used when reading English expository texts. Presented in HICE proceedings, 3406-3418.
    Lessard-Clouston, M. (1997). Language learning strategies: An overview for second language teachers. Retrieved December 28, 2011, from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Lessard-Clouston-Strategy.html
    Lo, M. (羅美貞). (2000). 高職英語教學面臨的困境與因應。商業職業教育,第14期,頁18-28。
    McCarthy, M. (1990). Vocabulary. Oxford, English: Oxford University Press.
    McCormick, W. (1988). Theories of reading in dialogue: An interdisciplinary study. New York: University Press of America.
    McNamara, D. S., O’Reilly, T, Rowe, M., Boonthum, C., & Levinstein, I. (2007). iSTART: A web-based tutor that teachers self-explanation and metacognitive reading strategies. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp.397-420). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    Mohamed, A. R., Chew, J., & Kabilan, M. K. (2006). Metacognitive reading strategies of good Malaysian Chinese learners. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 2, 21-41.
    Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94 (2), 249-259.
    Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25 (3), 2-10.
    Naiman, N., Frolich, M., Stern, H. H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The Good Language Learner. Toronto: Research in Education Series No. 7, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
    Neuman, S. B., Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2000). Learning to Read and Write. Developmentally Appropriate Practice for Children. Washington, DC: NAEYC
    Nunan, D. (1995). Closing the gap between learning and instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 29 (1), 133-158.
    Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language. Oxford: Heinemann.
    O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Oxford, R. & Burry-Stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). System, 23 (1), 1-23.
    Oxford, R. L. (1990a). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
    Oxford, R. L. (1990b). Styles, strategies, and aptitude: Connections for language learning. In T.S. Parry & C. W. Stansfield (Eds.), Language Aptitude Reconsidered (pp. 67-125). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Oxford, R. L. (1996). Employing a questionnaire to assess the use of language learning strategies. Applied Language Learning, 7, 27-42.
    Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: An overview. Retrieved February 15, 2012, from http://www.oomroom.ca/resources/online/oxford/Language_Learning_Styles_and_Strategies%20Oxford.doc
    Paivio, A (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
    Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Palincsar, A. (1986). Metacognitive strategy instruction. Exceptional Children, 53 (2), 118-124.
    Pereira-Laird, J. A., & Deane, F. P. (1997). Development and validation of a self-report measure of reading strategy use. Reading Psychology, 18 (3), 185-235.
    Poole, A. (2005). Gender differences in reading strategy use among ESL college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 36 (1), 7-20.
    Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Purpura, J. (1997). An analysis of the relationships between test taker’s cognitive and metacognitive strategy use and second language test performance. Language Learning, 42 (2), 289-325.
    Reardon, K. (2011). To what degree will learning to use context clues impact students’ reading comprehension scores? Master of Science in Education-Reading--University of Wisconsin-River Falls. Teacher Education Department.
    Rhoder, C., & Huerster, P. (2002). Use dictionaries for word meaning with caution. Journal of Adolescent & Adult literacy. 45 (8), 730-735.
    Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In A. Wenden and J. Rubin (Eds.). Learner Strategies in Language Learning, (pp. 15-30). New York: Prentice Hall.
    Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Oxford Journals Humanities, Applied Linguistics,11 (2), 129-158.
    Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P.J. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. (3–32). Cambridge, U.K.
    Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy. (199-227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem-solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 306-314.
    Taillefer, G. & Pugh, T. (1998). Strategies for professional reading in L1 and L2. Journal of Research in Reading, 21 (2), 96-108.
    Taillefer, G. (2005). Foreign Language Reading and Study Abroad: Cross-Cultural and Cross-Linguistic Questions. The Modern Language Journal, 89 (4), 503-528.
    Tsai, Y. R., Ernst, C., & Talley, P. C. (2010). L1 and L2 Strategy Use in Reading Comprehension of Chinese EFL Readers. Reading Psychology, 31 (1), 1-29.
    Tutor, I. (1996). Learner-centeredness as Language Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Ulijn, J. (1981). Conceptual and syntactic strategies in reading a foreign language. In E. Hopkins & R. Grotjahn (Eds.), Studies in language teaching and language acquisition (pp. 129-166). Bochum: Brockmeyer.
    Veenman, M. V., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3-14.
    Wang, Y. (2009). Research on three error types of Chinese ESL learners’ acquisition of passive voice. Asian Social Science, 5 (12), 134-140.
    Wenden, A. L. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy. London: Prentice Hall.
    Wenden, A. L. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied linguistics, 19 (4), 515-537.
    Williams, J. P., & Atkins, J. G. (2009). The Role of Metacognition in teaching reading comprehension to primary students. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 26-44). NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
    Williams, R., Ari, O., & Santamaria, C. (2011). Measusing college students’ reading comprehension ability using cloze tests. Journal of Research in Reading, 34 (2), 215-230.
    Winn, W., & Sunder, D. (1998). Cognitive perspectives in psychology. In D. H. Jonassen, (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 112-142). New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan.
    Wu, C. C. (2003). A study of EFL learning strategies used by vocational high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis. Yunlin: National Yunlin University of Science and Technology.
    Xu, X. (2007). A study of first-year college students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Communication Journal of Social Science and Humanism, 1 (1), 93-107.
    Yabukoshi, T., & Takeuchi, O. (2009). Language learning strategies used by lower secondary school learners in a Japanese EFL context. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19 (2), 136-172.
    Yau, J. C. (2009). Reading characteristics of Chinese-English adolescents: Knowledge and application of strategic reading. Metacognitive Learning, 4, 217-235.
    Zhang, L. J. (2008). Constructivist pedagogy in strategic reading instruction: Exploring pathways to learner development in the English as a second language (ESL) classrooms. Instructional Science: An international Journal of the Learning Sciences, 36, 89-116.
    Zhang, L. J., & Wu, A. (2009). Chinese senior high school EFL students’ metacognitive awareness and reading–strategy use. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21 (1), 37-59.
    Zhang, L. J. (2001). Awareness in reading: EFL students’ metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment. Language Awareness, 10 (4), 268-288.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE