簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 錢國倫
Kuo-Lun Chien
論文名稱: 工作與組織特性與五大人格特質之交互作用對組織人才吸引力的影響
The Effect of Interactions among Job and Organization Characteristics and Big-Five Personality Traits on Organizational Attractiveness
指導教授: 陳怡靜
Chen, Yi-Ching
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科技應用與人力資源發展學系
Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 97
中文關鍵詞: 工作與組織特性五大人格特質組織人才吸引力個人與組織適配
英文關鍵詞: Job and Organizational Characteristics, Big Five Personality Traits, Organizational Attractiveness, Person–Organization Fit
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:212下載:56
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究以個人與組織適配理論為理論基礎,目的在於探討五大人格特質對於工作與組織特性-組織人才吸引力兩者關係的調節效果,意即求職者的某些人格特質是否有效強化或弱化工作與組織特性對組織人才吸引力的影響。本研究基於策略攫取取向,採用混合實驗設計,分別以受試者間設計衡量受試者的五大人格特質,以2×2×2×2×2五因子受試者內完全因子實驗設計,以文字敘述方式操弄五項工作與組織特性,包括:工作挑戰性、薪資組合、工作地點、企業聲望與同事支持,每個因子包含高低兩種水準,建構出包含不同訊息的32種情境腳本(即實驗處理)。本研究以主修組織行為、人力資源管理、行銷管理與財務管理等相關商管系所之大四、碩二等即將步入職場的應屆畢業生為施測樣本,每位受試者均需完成32份腳本之施測。研究結果發現,外向傾向的求職者偏好提供具挑戰性工作與高變動性薪資的企業;勤勉正直傾向的求職者偏好聲望較佳的企業;親和傾向的求職者偏好向來重視同事支持的企業;神經質傾向的求職者偏好提供高固定性薪資的企業;經驗開放傾向的求職者則偏好提供具挑戰性工作的企業與聲望較高之企業。

    On the basis of Person-Organization Fit theory, this study aims to investigate how the interactive effects between the big five personality traits and job and organizational characteristics influence organizational attractiveness. These job and organizational characteristics include challenging work, coworker support, pay mix, location, and company reputation. A mixed experimental design combing within-subjects and between-subjects components was used. A 2×2×2×2×2 within-subject experimental design which contained 32 scenarios was administrated to undergraduate and graduate students from seven universities. Inter- individual differences based on Big Five personality traits were assessed using the between-subjects part of the design. The results showed that organizations with more challenging work were perceived more attractiveness by applicants with Extraversion and Openness to Experience. Applicants with Agreeableness were attracted by companies with higher level of coworker support. As for the level of pay mix, Extraversion applicants prefer organizations with higher level of variable pay; on the other hand, Neuroticism ones prefer higher level of fix pay. Applicants with Conscientiousness and Openness to Experience were also attracted by organizations with better reputation.

    謝 誌 i 中文摘要 iii ABSTRACT v 目 錄 vii 表 次 ix 圖 次 xi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 5 第三節 研究範圍 6 第四節 重要名詞釋義 6 第五節 研究流程 8 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 組織人才吸引力 9 第二節 工作與組織特性對於組織人才吸引力之影響 9 第三節 五大人格特質的調節效果 13 第三章 研究方法 19 第一節 研究設計 19 第二節 研究對象 20 第三節 研究程序 20 第四節 變數衡量 21 第五節 分析方法 25 第四章 研究結果 27 第一節 操弄檢定 27 第二節 相關分析 27 第三節 階層線性模式分析 28 第五章 結論與建議 43 第一節 理論貢獻 43 第二節 實務意涵 46 第三節 限制與未來研究 47 參考文獻 49 一、中文部分 49 二、外文部分 49 附 錄 63 附錄一 個人背景變項與五大人格特質問卷 64 附錄二 工作與組織特性之32組腳本、組織人才吸引力問卷 66

    一、中文部分
    丁永祥(2010)。2010年大學應屆畢業生就業意向調查。管理雜誌,430,40-47。
    行政院主計處(2011,1/24)。99年12月暨全年人力資源調查統計結果。行政院主計處新聞稿。取自:http://www.stat.gov.tw/public/Attachment/112410213971.pdf
    林文政(2006)。薪資管理。載於李誠(主編),人力資源管理的十二堂課(頁177-226)。台北:天下文化。
    林能白、丘宏昌(1999)。服務品質之研究-服務人員人格特質之影響分析與應用。管理學報,16,175-200。
    葉佳綾、許壹傑(2009)。企業聲望對組織人才吸引力與求職意圖之影響,臺灣企業績效學刊,3(1),103-119。
    蔡維奇、黃嘉雄、顏麗真(2008)。人力資源管理制度及其組合對組織人才吸引力的影響,台大管理論叢,19(1),1-28。

    二、外文部分
    Aiman-Smith, L., Bauer, T. N., & Cable, D. M. (2001). Are you attracted? Do you intend to pursue? A recruiting policy-capturing study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16(2), 219-237.
    Amabile, T. M., Conti , R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
    Barber, A. E. (1998). Recruiting Employees, Individual and organizational perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
    Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A., (2001). Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next?. Personality and Performance, 9, 9-30.
    Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., & Piotrowski, M. (2002). Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 43-51.
    Barrick M. R., Mount, M. K., & Gupta, R. (2003). Meta-analysis of the Relationship between the Five-Factor Model of Personality and Holland's Occupational Types. Personnel Psychology, 56, 45-74.
    Bartko, J. J. (1976). On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 762-765.
    Billings, R. S., & Scherer, L. L. (1988). The effects of response mode and importance on decision making strategies: Judgment versus choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 1-19.
    Bipp, T. (2010). What do People Want from their Jobs? The Big Five, core self-evaluations and work motivation. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 28-39.
    Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and Analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations (pp. 349-381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
    Bourhis, A., & Mekkaoui, R. (2010). Beyond work-family balance: Are family-friendly organizations more attractive?. Relations Industrielles, 65(1), 98-117.
    Bretz, R. D., & Judge, T. A. (1994). The role of human resource systems in job applicant decision processes. Journal of Management, 20, 531-551.
    Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Burkitt, L. (2010, May 23). America’s Most Reputable Companies. Forbes. Retrieved May 23, 2010, from http://www.forbes.com/2010/05/23/apple-google-sony-cmo-network-global-reputable-companies. html
    Buss, D. M. (1992). Manipulation in Close Relationships: Five personality factors in interactional context. Journal of Personality, 60, 477-499.
    Cable, D. M., & Graham, M. E. (2000). The Determinants of Job Seekers’ Reputation Perceptions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 929-947.
    Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1994). Pay preferences and job search decisions: A person-organization fit perspective. Personnel Psychology, 47 (2), 317-348.
    Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person-organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 294-311.
    Cable, D. M., & Turban, D. B. (2001). Establishing the dimensions, sources, and value of job seekers’ employer knowledge during recruitment. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 20, 115-163.
    Carless, S. A. (2005). Person–Job Fit versus Person–Organization Fit as Predictors of Organizational Attraction and Job Acceptance Intentions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 411–430.
    Carless, S. A., & Imber, A. (2007). Job and Organizational Characteristics: A construct evaluation of applicant perceptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 328-341.
    Chapman, D. S., Uggerslev, K. L., Carroll, S. A., Piasentin, K. A., & Jones, D. A. (2005). Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: A meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 928-944.
    Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234-246.
    Chiaburu, D. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2008). Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1082-1103.
    Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
    Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Collins, C.J., & Han, J. (2004). Exploring applicant pool quantity and quality: The effects of early recruitment practice strategies, corporate advertising, and firm reputation. Personnel Psychology, 57, 685-717.
    Collins, C. J., & Stevens, C. K. (2002). The relationship between early recruitment-related activities and the application decisions of new labor-market entrants: A brand equity approach to recruitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1121-1133.
    Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1989). The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
    Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO-PIR: Professional manual. Odessa, FL.: Psychological Assessment Resources.
    Day, E., Radosevich, D. J., & Chasteen, C. S. (2003). Construct- and Criterion-related Validity of Four Commonly Used Goal Orientation Instruments. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 434-464.
    De Jong, R. D., Van der Velde, M. E. G., & Jansen, P. G. W. (2001). Openness to Experience and Growth Need Strength as Moderators Between Job Characteristics and Satisfaction. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 350-356.
    Deshpande, S. P., & Schoderbek, P. P. (1993). Pay-allocations by managers: A policy-capturing approach. Human Relations, 46, 465-79.
    Dineen, B. R., Ash, S. R., & Noe, R. A. (2002). A web of applicant attraction: Person-organization fit in the context of Web-based recruitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 723-734.
    Dutton, J. E., & Dukerich, J. M. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 517-554.
    Ehrhart, K. H., & Ziegert, J. C. (2005). Why are individuals attracted to organizations? Journal of Management, 31, 901-919.
    Emmons, R. A., Diener, E., & Larsen, R. J. (1986). Choice and avoidance of everyday situations and affect congruence: Two models of reciprocal interactionism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 815-826.
    Ensher, E. A., Thomas, C., & Murphy, S. E. (2001). Comparison of traditional, step-ahead, and peer mentoring on protégés' support, satisfaction, and perceptions of career success: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology, 15(3), 419-438.
    Fischhoff, B. (1996). The real world: What good is it? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 232-248.
    Fisher, C. D. (1985). Social support and adjustment to work: A longitudinal study. Journal of Management, 11, 39-53.
    Fombrun, C. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy, Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233-258.
    Furnham, A., Forde, L., & Ferrari, K. (1999). Personality and Work Motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 1035-1043.
    Furnham, A., Petrides, K. V., Tsaousis, I., Pappas, K., & Garrod, D. (2005). A Cross-Cultural Investigation into the Relationships Between Personality Traits and Work Values. The Journal of Psychology, 139, 5-32.
    Gerhart, B., & Milkovich, G. T. (1990). Organizational differences in managerial compensation and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 663-691.
    Glanzer, M., & Cunitz, A. R. (1966). Two storage mechanisms in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 351-360.
    Goldberg ,C. B. (2001). Applicant reaction to the employment interview a look at demographic similarity and social identity theory. Journal of business research, 56(8), 561-571.
    Graham, M. E., & Cable, D. M. (2001). Consideration of the incomplete block design for policy-capturing research. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 26-45.
    Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic Econometrics. (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
    Hammond, K. R. (1996). Human judgment and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Hanushek, E. A., & Jackson, J. E. (1977). Statistical methods for social scientists. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
    Harold, C. M., & Ployhart, R. E. (2008). What do applicants want: Examining changes in attribute importance judgments over time. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 191-218.
    Harris, M., & Fink, L. S. (1987). A Field Study of Applicant Reactions to Employment Opportunities: Does the recruiter make a difference. Personnel Psychology, 40, 765-784.
    Hastie, R., & Dawes, R. M. (2001). Rational choice in an uncertain world. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
    Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57, 39-683.
    Highhouse, S., Lievens F., & Sinar, E. F. (2003). Measuring attraction to organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 986-1101.
    Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rational of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23, 723-744.
    James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 219-229.
    James, W. W., Rafik I. B., Joseph D., & Sita V. (2009). Personality and national culture: Predictors of compensation strategy preferences in the United States of America and India, Management Research News, 32(8), 767-781.
    Jerez-Gómez, P., Céspedes-Lorente, J., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2005). Organizational learning and Compensation Strategies: Evidence from the Spanish Chemical Industry. Human Resource Management, 3, 279-299.
    Judge, T. A., & Bretz, R. D. (1992). Effects of work values on job choice decisions, Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3), 261-271.
    Judge, T. A., & Cable, D. M. (1997). Applicant personality, organizational culture, and organization attraction. Personnel Psychology, 50, 359-395.
    Judge.T. A., Higgins, C. A.,Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick,M. R. (1999). The Big Five Personality Traits, General Mental Ability and Career success Across the Life Span. Personnel Psychology, 2(3), 621-652.
    Jurgensen, C. E. (1978). Job preferences (What makes a job good or bad?). Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 267-276.
    Kausel, E. E., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Narrow personality traits and organizational attraction: Evidence for the complementary hypothesis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114, 3-14.
    Keppel, G. (1982). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Koole, S., Jager, W., Vlek, C. A. J., van den Berg, A. E., & Hofstee, W. K. B. (2001). On the Social Nature of Personality: Effects of extraversion, agreeableness, and feedback about collective resource use on cooperation in a resource dilemma. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 289-301.
    Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions (pp. 3-90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person–organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualization, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1-50.
    Lawler, E. E., III, Kuleck, W. J., Jr., Rhode, J. G., & Sorensen, J. E. (1975). Job choice and post decision dissonance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 133-145.
    Lawler, E. E., & Jenkins, G. D. (1992). Strategic reward systems. In M.D. Dunnette, & L.M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1009-1055). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
    LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and Cooperative Behavior as Contrasting Forms of Contextual Performance: Evidence of differential relationships with the Big Five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 326-336.
    Liao, H., & Chuang, A., (2008). Multilevel model building and analysis, In X. P. Chen, A. S. Tsui & J. L. Farh (Eds.), Empirical methods in organization and management research (pp. 332-357). Beijing: Peking University Press.
    Lievens, F. (2007). Employer branding in the Belgian Army: The importance of instrumental and symbolic beliefs for potential applicants, actual applicants, and military employees. Human Resource Management, 46, 51-69.
    Lievens, F., & Highhouse, S. (2003). The relation of instrumental and symbolic attributes to a company’s attractiveness as an employer. Personnel Psychology, 56, 75-102.
    Lievens, F., Decaesteker, C., Coetsier, P., & Geinaert, J. (2001). Organizational attractiveness for prospective applicants: A person–organisation fit perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50, 30-51.
    Lievens, F., Van Hoye, G., & Schreurs, B. (2005). Examining the Relationship between Employer Knowledge Dimensions and Organizational Attractiveness: An application in a military context. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 553-572.
    Locke, E. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3, 157-189.
    Martocchio, J. J., & Judge, T. A. (1994). A policy capturing approach to individuals' decisions to be absent. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 358-386.
    McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.
    McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., & Yik, M. (1996). Universal aspects of Chinese personality structure. In M. H. Bond (Eds.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 189-207). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
    Mervielde, I. (1992). The B5BBS-25: A Flemish set of bipolar markers for the Big Five personality factors. Psychologica Belgica, 32, 195-210.
    Milkovich, G., & Newman, J. (2002). Compensation. (7th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
    Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321-1339.
    Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1995). The Big Five Personality Dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resources management. In: Ferris, G.R. (Eds.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (pp. 153-200). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., Jamerson, J. E., Samuel, D. B., Olson, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2006). Psychometric properties of an abbreviated instrument of the five-factor model. Assessment, 13, 119-137.
    Osborn, D. P. (1990). A reexamination of the organizational choice process. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 36, 45-60.
    Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Posner, B. (1981). Comparing recruiters, students, and faculty perceptions of important applicant and job characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 34, 329-339.
    Powell, G. N. (1984). Effects of Job Attributes and Recruiting Practices on Applicant Decisions: A comparison. Personnel Psychology, 37, 721-732.
    Powell, G. N. (1991). Applicant Reactions to the Initial Employment Interview: Exploring theoretical and methodological issues. Personnel Psychology, 44, 67-83.
    Powell, G. N., & Goulet, L. R. (1996). Recruiters’ and applicants’ reactions to campus interviews and employment decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1619-1640.
    Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods.(2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Rynes, S. L., Bretz, R. D., & Gerhart, B. (1991). The importance of recruitment in job choice: A different way of looking. Personnel Psychology, 44, 487-521.
    Rynes, S. L., & Lawler, J. (1983). A policy-capturing investigation of the role of expectancies in decisions to pursue job alternatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 620-631.
    Saucier, G., (1994). Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg's unipolar big-five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506-516.
    Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-454.
    Schneider, B., Goldstiein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. (1995). The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology, 48, 747-773.
    Schreurs, B., Druart, C., Proost, K., & de Witte, K. (2009). Symbolic attributes and organizational attractiveness: the moderating effects of applicant personality. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 17(1), 35-46.
    Shenkar, O., & Yuchtman-Yaar, E. 1997. Reputation, Image, Prestige, and Goodwill: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Organizational Standing. Human Relations, 50(11), 1361-1381.
    Slaughter, J. E., & Greguras, G. J. (2009). Initial attraction to organizations: The influence of trait inferences. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 1-18.
    Slaughter, J. E., Richard, E. M., & Martin, J. H. (2006). Comparing the efficacy of direct estimates and policy capturing weights for predicting job choice. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 285-314.
    Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374.
    Stewart, T. R. (1988). Judgment analysis: Procedures. In B. Brehmer & C. R. B. Joyce (Eds.), Human judgment: The SJT view (pp. 41-74). North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers.
    Thoits, P. A. (1985). Social support and psychological well-being: Theoretical possibilities. In I.G. Sarason, & B. R. Sarason (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 51-72). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
    Thorsteinson, T. J., Palmer, E. M., Wulff, C., & Anderson, A. (2004). Too good to be true? Using realism to enhance applicant attraction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(1), 125-137.
    Trank, C. Q., Rynes, S. L., & Bretz, R. D. (2002). Attracting applicants in the war for talent:Differences in work preferences among high achievers. Journal of Business and Psychology,16, 331-345.
    Tsai, W. C., & Yang, I. W. F. (2010). Does image matter to different job applicants? The influences of corporate image and applicant individual differences on organizational attractiveness. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(1), 48-63.
    Turban, D. B. (2001). Organizational attractiveness as an employer on college campuses: An examination of the applicant population. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 293-312.
    Turban, D. B., & Cable, D. M. (2003). Firm reputation and applicant pool characteristics, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(6), 733-751.
    Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658-672.
    Turban, D. B., & Keon, T. L. (1993). Organizational attractiveness: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 184-193.
    Turban, D. B., Forret, M. L., & Hendrickson, C. L. (1998). Applicant attraction to firms: Influences of organization, reputation, job and organizational attributes, and recruiter behaviors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52, 24-44.
    Turban, D. B., Campion, J. E., & Eyring, A. R. (1995). Factors related to job acceptance decisions of college recruits. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47, 193-213.
    Turban, D. B., Lau, C. M., Ngo, H. Y., Chow, I. H.S., & Si, S. X. (2001). Organizational attractiveness of firms in the People's Republic of China: A person-organization fit perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 194-206.
    Van Hoye, G., & Lievens, F. (2007). Social influences on organizational attractiveness: Investigating if and when word-of-mouth matters. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 2024-2047.
    Williamson, C. L., Cope, J. G., Thompson, L. F., & Wuensch, K. L. (2002). Policy capturing as a tool to enhance recruiting. Career Development International, 7, 159-166.
    Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation Seeking: Beyond the optimal mix of arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., Joireman, J., Teta, P., & Kraft, M. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: the big three, the big five, and the alternative five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 757-768.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE