簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 楊一鳴
論文名稱: 大學學生事務主管專業領導力及其發展研究
A Study of University Student Affairs Administrators’ Professional Leadership Competency and Their Development
指導教授: 張雪梅
Chang, Hsueh-Mei
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 公民教育與活動領導學系
Department of Civic Education and Leadership
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 366
中文關鍵詞: 大學學生事務主管領導行為取向學務專業領導力學務專業領導力發展學務領導人特質
英文關鍵詞: university student affairs administrator, leadership behavioral approach, professional student affairs leadership competencies, development of professional student affairs leadership competencies, student affairs leadership personality traits
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:65下載:23
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討我國大學校院學務主管專業領導力與其發展方式,探究其領導行為取向、學務領導人特質、學務專業領導力之情況、影響因素及其對學務專業領導力發展方式之看法;探討學務主管之個人背景、學校背景與前述變項間的關聯性,用以研擬未來規劃學務專業領導力發展之方向。
    本研究主要之目的如下:
    一、瞭解我國大學學務主管之領導行為取向、學務領導人特質、學務專業領導力情 形。
    二、探討我國大學學務主管專業領導力的相關影響因素。
    三、瞭解不同背景變項、領導行為取向、學務領導人特質、學務專業領導力之學務主管對專業領導力發展方式重要性之看法。
    四、探討有效提昇大學學務主管專業領導力之發展方式或措施。
    本研究採調查法及半結構深度訪談法探討。以研究者編製的「大學學生事務主管專業領導力發展調查問卷」進行調查研究。問卷內容包括:專業領導力發展方式、學務專業領導力、學務領導人特質、領導行為取向、基本資料等五個部分。以描述統計、 t檢定、單因子變異數分析、相關分析、逐步多元迴歸等統計方法進行資料處理分析。另透過深度訪談瞭解領導力發展有關問題。最後依研究發現,提出大學學務主管專業領導力發展之建議,供作學校行政當局人力資源開發,研擬未來規劃學務專業領導力發展之參考。
    研究結論如下:
    一、大學學務主管四面向之領導行為取向多傾向「時常如此」,而其中在「人力資源層面」的表現最佳。就學務領導人特質言,在五點量表上之平均數為4.29分,介於「時常如此」~「總是如此」。就學務專業領導力言,多傾向「時常如此」,而其中在「資源調配運作」的表現最佳。
    二、領導行為取向因個人背景因素有顯著差異,不因學校背景因素而有所差異。
    三、學務領導人特質僅因學務行政工作年資、現職層級等因素有顯著差異,不因學校背景因素而有所差異。
    四、學務專業領導力因性別、學務行政工作年資、遴用類別、現職層級等因素有顯著差異,不因學校背景因素而有差異。
    五、學務主管對各類領導力發展方式重要性的看法頗為一致。
    六、學務專業領導力與領導行為取向、學務領導人特質有顯著關聨。
    七、學務主管自認為具有相當高度之學務專業領導力。
    八、領導行為取向(結構層面、政治層面、象徵層面)、學務領導人特質對學務專業領導力具有解釋力。
    九、學務專業領導力發展方式之重要性雖有不同,但各類學務專業領導力發展方式皆有其價值。

    This study is designed to explore the professional leadership competency and development of student affairs administrators of our universities. Specifically, it examines the behavioral approaches to leadership, leadership personality traits, the state of their professional leadership competencies, contributing factors to their formation, and lastly their own personal views on leadership competency development. The correlation between the administrators’ personal and academic background and the above-mentioned variables was also examined in order to design a development blueprint for administrator competencies.

    The goals of this research are as follows:
    1)Understanding student affairs administrators’ behavioral approaches towards leadership, their leadership personality traits, and professional leadership competencies;
    2)Exploring contributing factors to administrators’ professional leadership competencies;
    3)Learning the effects of variable backgrounds, leadership behavioral approaches and professional leadership competencies on the importance administrators attach to ways of developing professional leadership competencies;
    4)Finding approaches to effectively improve the development of these leadership competencies.

    In order to examine these leadership skills, this study incorporates surveys and semi-structured in-depth interviews. Between Nov. 2011 and May 2012, 675 questionnaires were sent out to university administrators throughout Taiwan, from deans of universities to lower-level leaders. 507 questionnaires were returned. These questionnaires covered five key areas: methods of developing professional leadership competencies, professional student affairs leadership competencies, leadership personality traits of student affairs administrators, leadership behavioral approaches, and basic demographic and personal data. Data collected were processed and analyzed using standard descriptive statistic methods, including T-tests, one-way analysis of variance, correlation analysis and stepwise multiple regression. In addition, six in-depth interviews were conducted among active and former administrators in order to better understand related issues. Finally, based on the findings, suggestions are made to school administrative authorities as a reference for their development and planning of human resources and professional leadership skills.

    The findings are as follows:
    1)Most respondents answered positively overall (“usually-so” on a 5-point Likert scale) for the four aspects of leadership behavior, with the best performance in the human resources frame. As far as leadership personality traits are concerned, the average score on the five-point Likert scale is 4.29 points, ranging between “usually so” and “always so.” As for professional leadership competencies, most tend to be “usually so,” with the best performance in the sub categories of resource mobilization and distribution operations;
    2)Personal background makes a conspicuous difference in leadership behavioral approaches while school background makes no difference;
    3)Factors such as the seniority and ranking of student affairs administrators have a significant impact on leadership personality traits while school background makes no difference;
    4)Gender, seniority, job categories assigned and ranking make a conspicuous difference in professional leadership competencies while school background makes no difference;
    5)Student affairs administrators share nearly identical views regarding the importance of ways of developing professional leadership competencies;
    6)There are significant correlations among student affairs professional leadership competencies, leadership behavioral approaches and leadership personality trait;
    7)Student affairs administrators highly regard their own professional leadership competencies;
    8)Professional student affairs leadership competencies can be interpreted by leadership behavioral approaches (in structural, political and symbolic frames) and leadership personality traits;
    9)Various ways of developing professional leadership competencies examined may differ in importance, but they are all valuable in one way or another.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 5 第三節 研究目的與問題 8 第四節 重要名詞詮釋 10 第五節 研究範圍與限制 15 第二章 文獻探討 19 第一節 學務專業化發展 19 第二節 學務專業領導力的涵義與專業規準 29 第三節 多元架構領導理論 50 第四節 學務領導人特質 59 第五節 學務專業領導力發展理論及研究 66 第三章 研究設計與實施 105 第一節 研究架構 105 第二節 研究假設 107 第三節 研究對象 111 第四節 研究工具 113 第五節 研究方法與實施程序 123 第六節 資料處理與統計分析 126 第七節 個案訪談 128 第四章 研究結果分析與討論 131 第一節 研究對象基本資料分析 131 第二節 大學院校學務主管之領導行為取向、學務領導人特質及學務專業領導力 141 第三節 學務主管的領導行為取向、學務領導人特質及學務專業領導力間的關係 193 第四節 學務主管專業領導力發展方式 215 第五節 有效提升學務專業領導力之方式 241 第五章 結論與建議 247 第一節 結論 247 第二節 建議 253 參考文獻 261 中文部分 261 英文部分 263 附錄 276 附錄A Bolman同意函 276 附錄B 專家名單 277 附錄C 給專家的信 278 附錄D 大學學生事務主管專業領導力發展調查問卷(專家效度問卷) 279 附錄E 致謝函 299 附錄F 大學學生事務主管專業領導力發展調查問卷(專家效度問卷)意見綜整 300 附錄G 給預試連絡人的信 328 附錄H 大學學生事務主管專業領導力發展調查問卷(預試) 329 附錄I 給正式施測連絡人的信 336 附錄J 大學學生事務主管專業領導力發展調查問卷 337 附錄K 大學學務主管訪談紀錄 343 附錄L 「學務專業領導力量表」因素分析摘要表(N=162) 364 附錄M 「領導行為取向量表」因素分析摘要表(N=162) 365 附錄N 「領導行為取向量表」32題刪為17題 366 表 次 表2-2-1 國外研究者對領導的定義彙整表 30 表2-2-2 國內研究者對領導的定義彙整表 35 表2-2-3 基本能力與內在基礎特質之區別 44 表2-3-1 領導行為四種取向的圖像比較 54 表2-4-1 成功學務領導人特質表 65 表2-5-1 訓練教育與發展基本概念比較 74 表2-5-2 國內以大學學務主管為研究主題之博碩士論文及研究彙整表 81 表2-5-3 學務哲理演進與學務專業領導力發展方式之變遷關聯表 104 表3-3-1 本研究現有學校數、寄送預試學校及正式施測學校數規劃表 111 表3-3-2 本研究實際收回預試學校數及正式施測學校數表 112 表3-3-3 本研究實際收回預試份數及正式施測份數表 113 表3-4-1 專業領導力發展方式臨界比檢定 114 表3-4-2 學務專業領導力量表臨界比檢定 116 表3-4-3 學務專業領導力問卷信度分析表 117 表3-4-4 學務領導人特質量表臨界比檢定 118 表3-4-5 領導行為取向問卷臨界比檢定 120 表3-4-6 領導行為取向問卷信度分析表 122 表4-1-1 研究對象在個人背景變項人數及百分比分配表 132 表4-1-2 研究對象在學校背景變項人數及百分比分配表 133 表4-1-3 研究對象性別在個人背景變項人數及百分比分配表 134 表4-1-4 研究對象學務行政年資在個人背景變項之人數及百分比分配表 135 表4-1-5 研究對象遴用類別在個人背景變項之人數及百分比分配表 136 表4-1-6 研究對象教育程度在個人背景變項人數及百分比分配表 137 表4-1-7 研究對象現職在個人背景變項人數及百分比分配表 139 表4-2-1 學務主管領導行為取向、學務領導人特質、專業領導力之平均數與 標準差 142 表4-2-2 學務主管專業領導力之平均數、標準差及排序 144 表4-2-3 不同性別學務主管在領導行為取向之 t 考驗摘要表 146 表4-2-4 不同學務工作年資的學務主管在領導行為取向之平均數與標準差 147 表4-2-5 不同學務工作年資學務主管在領導行為取向之變異數分析摘要表 148 表4-2-6 不同遴用類別的學務主管在領導行為取向之平均數與標準差 150 表4-2-7 不同遴用類別學務主管在領導行為取向之變異數分析摘要表 151 表4-2-8 不同教育程度的學務主管在領導行為取向之平均數與標準差 153 表4-2-9 不同教育程度學務主管在領導行為取向之變異數分析摘要表 154 表4-2-10 不同最高學歷學門的學務主管在領導行為取向之平均數與標準差 155 表4-2-11 不同最高學歷學門學務主管在領導行為取向之變異數分析摘要表 155 表4-2-12 不同現職的學務主管在領導行為取向之平均數與標準差 156 表4-2-13 不同現職學務主管在領導行為取向之變異數分析摘要表 157 表4-2-14 不同學校類型的學務主管在領導行為取向之平均數與標準差 157 表4-2-15 不同學校類型學務主管在領導行為取向之變異數分析摘要表 158 表4-2-16 不同學生規模的學務主管在領導行為取向之平均數與標準差 158 表4-2-17 不同學生規模學務主管在領導行為取向之變異數分析摘要表 158 表4-2-18 不同學校地區的學務主管在領導行為取向之平均數與標準差 159 表4-2-19 不同學校地區學務主管在領導行為取向之變異數分析摘要表 159 表4-2-20 不同性別學務主管在學務領導人特質之 t 考驗摘要表 159 表4-2-21 不同學務工作年資學務主管在學務領導人特質之平均數與標準差 160 表4-2-22 不同學務工作年資學務主管在學務領導人特質之變異數分析摘要表 160 表4-2-23 不同遴用類別學務主管在學務領導人特質之平均數與標準差 161 表4-2-24 不同遴用類別學務主管在學務領導人特質之變異數分析摘要表 161 表4-2-25 不同教育程度學務主管在學務領導人特質之平均數與標準差 161 表4-2-26 不同教育程度學務主管在學務領導人特質之變異數分析摘要表 161 表4-2-27 不同最高學歷學門學務主管在學務領導人特質之平均數與標準差 162 表4-2-28 不同最高學歷學門學務主管在學務領導人特質之變異數分析摘要表 162 表4-2-29 不同現職學務主管在學務領導人特質之平均數與標準差 162 表4-2-30 不同現職學務主管在學務領導人特質之變異數分析摘要表 163 表4-2-31 不同學校類型學務主管在學務領導人特質之平均數與標準差 163 表4-2-32 不同學校類型學務主管在學務領導人特質之變異數分析摘要表 163 表4-2-33 不同學生規模學務主管在學務領導人特質之平均數與標準差 164 表4-2-34 不同學生規模學務主管在學務領導人特質之變異數分析摘要表 164 表4-2-35 不同學校地區的學務主管在學務領導人特質之平均數與標準差 164 表4-2-36 不同學校地區學務主管在學務領導人特質之變異數分析摘要表 164 表4-2-37 不同性別學務主管在學務專業領導力之 t 考驗摘要表 165 表4-2-38 不同學務工作年資學務主管在學務專業領導力之平均數與標準差 167 表4-2-39 不同學務工作年資學務主管在學務專業領導力變異數分析摘要表 168 表4-2-40 不同遴用類別學務主管在學務專業領導力之平均數與標準差 170 表4-2-41 不同遴用類別學務主管在學務專業領導力變異數分析摘要表 171 表4-2-42 不同教育程度學務主管在學務專業領導力之平均數與標準差 172 表4-2-43 不同教育程度學務主管在學務專業領導力之變異數分析摘要表 172 表4-2-44 不同最高學歷學門學務主管在學務專業領導力之平均數與標準差 172 表4-2-45 不同最高學歷學門學務主管在學務專業領導力之變異數分析摘要表 173 表4-2-46 不同現職學務主管在學務專業領導力之平均數與標準差 174 表4-2-47 不同遴用類別學務主管在學務專業領導力變異數分析摘要表 175 表4-2-48 不同學校類型學務主管在學務專業領導力之平均數與標準差 176 表4-2-49 不同學校類型學務主管在學務專業領導力之變異數分析摘要表 176 表4-2-50 不同學生規模學務主管在學務專業領導力之平均數與標準差 176 表4-2-51 不同學生規模學務主管在學務專業領導力之變異數分析摘要表 176 表4-2-52 不同學校地區學務主管在學務專業領導力之平均數與標準差 177 表4-2-53 不同學校地區學務主管在學務專業領導力之變異數分析摘要表 177 表4-2-54 個人背景在領導行為取向之研究假設考驗結果摘要 178 表4-2-55 學校背景在領導行為取向之研究假設考驗結果摘要 182 表4-2-56 個人背景在學務領導人特質之研究假設考驗結果摘要 184 表4-2-57 學校背景在學務領導人特質之研究假設考驗結果摘要 186 表4-2-58 個人背景在學務專業領導力之研究假設考驗結果摘要 187 表4-2-59 學校背景在學務專業領導力之研究假設考驗結果摘要 192 表4-3-1 不同領導行為取向學務主管在學務專業領導力之平均數與標準差 194 表4-3-2 不同領導行為取向學務主管在學務專業領導力之變異數分析摘要表 196 表4-3-3 不同學務領導人特質學務主管在學務專業領導力之平均數與標準差 197 表4-3-4 不同學務領導人特質學務主管在學務專業領導力之變異數分析摘要表199 表4-3-5 學務主管領導行為取向、學務領導人特質及專業領導力之相關 201 表4-3-6 個人背景、領導行為取向、學務領導人特質對專業領導力之迴歸分析 摘要表 203 表4-3-7 個人背景、領導行為取向、學務領導人特質對願景目標宣示迴歸分析 摘要表 204 表4-3-8 個人背景、領導行為取向、學務領導人特質對資源調配運作迴歸分析 摘要表 205 表4-3-9 個人背景、領導行為取向、學務領導人特質對人力導引發展迴歸分析 摘要表 206 表4-3-10 個人背景、領導行為取向、學務領導人特質對公民倫理參與迴歸分析 摘要表 207 表4-3-11 領導行為取向在學務專業領導力之研究假設考驗結果摘要 208 表4-3-12 學務領導人特質在學務專業領導力之研究假設考驗結果摘要 209 表4-3-13 領導行為取向、學務領導人特質及學務專業領導力間之研究假設考驗 結果摘要 210 表4-3-14 背景變項、領導行為取向及學務領導人特質能有效解釋其學務專業領 導力之研究假設考驗結果摘要 213 表4-4-1 學務主管對領導力發展方式重要性的看法平均數、標準差及排序 216 表4-4-2 不同性別學務主管在領導力發展方式重要性看法的差異性 217 表4-4-3 不同性別學務主管對領導力發展方式之重要程度看法 t 考驗摘要表 217 表4-4-4 不同學務工作年資學務主管在領導力發展方式重要性看法的差異性 218 表4-4-5 不同學務行政工作年資學務主管在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之 平均數與標準差 219 表4-4-6 不同學務行政工作年資學務主管在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之 變異數分析摘要表 219 表4-4-7 不同遴用類別學務主管在領導力發展方式重要性看法的差異性 220 表4-4-8 不同遴用類別學務主管在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之平均數與 標準差 220 表4-4-9 不同遴用類別學務主管在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之變異數分 析摘要 221 表4-4-10 不同教育程度學務主管在領導力發展方式重要性看法的差異性 221 表4-4-11 不同教育程度學務主管在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之平均數與 標準差 222 表4-4-12 不同教育程度學務主管在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之變異數分 析摘要表 222 表4-4-13 不同最高學歷學門學務主管在領導力發展方式重要性看法的差異性 223 表4-4-14 不同最高學歷學門學務主管在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之平均 數與標準差 223 表4-4-15 不同最高學歷學門學務主管在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之變異 數分析摘要表 223 表4-4-16 不同現職層級學務主管在領導力發展方式重要性看法的差異性 224 表4-4-17 不同現職層級學務主管在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之平均數與 標準差 224 表4-4-18 不同現職層級學務主管在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之變異數分 析摘要表 225 表4-4-19 不同學校類型學務主管在領導力發展方式重要性看法的差異性 225 表4-4-20 不同學校類型學務主管在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之平均數與 標準差 226 表4-4-21 不同學校類型學務主管在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之變異數分 析摘要表 226 表4-4-22 不同學生規模學務主管在領導力發展方式重要性看法的差異性 227 表4-4-23 不同學生規模學務主管在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之平均數與 標準差 227 表4-4-24 不同學生規模學務主管在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之變異數分 析摘要表 227 表4-4-25 不同學校地區學務主管在領導力發展方式重要性看法的差異性 228 表4-4-26 不同學校地區學務主管在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之平均數與 標準差 228 表4-4-27 不同學校地區學務主管在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之變異數分 析摘要表 229 表4-4-28 不同領導行為取向學務主管在領導力發展方式重要性看法的差異性 230 表4-4-29 不同領導行為取向的學務主管在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之平 均數與標準差 230 表4-4-30 不同領導行為取向的學務主管在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之變 異數分析摘要表 231 表4-4-31 不同學務領導人特質的學務主管在領導力發展方式重要性看法的差異 性 231 表4-4-32 不同學務領導人特質學務主管在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之平 均數與標準差 232 表4-4-33 不同學務領導人特質學務主管在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之變 異數分析摘要表 232 表4-4-34 不同學務專業領導力的學務主管在領導力發展方式重要性看法的差異 性 233 表4-4-35 不同學務專業領導力學務主管在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之平 均數與標準差 234 表4-4-36 不同學務專業領導力學務主管在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之變 異數分析摘要表 234 表4-4-37 個人背景在學務專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之研究假設考驗結果 摘要 235 表4-4-38 學校背景在學務專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之研究假設考驗結果 摘要 235 表4-4-39 學務主管在領導力發展方式重要性看法的差異性 236 表4-4-40 領導行為取向在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之研究假設考驗結果 摘要 239 表4-4-41 學務領導人特質在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之研究假設考驗結 果摘要 240 表4-4-42 學務專業領導力在專業領導力發展方式重要性看法之研究假設考驗結 果摘要 240 圖 次 圖2-2-1 冰山模式 42 圖2-2-2 成長樹模式 43 圖2-2-3 competence & competency發展過程之比較 44 圖2-5-1 不同階層主管所需領導力之相對重要性比較圖 72 圖2-5-2 人員訓練和進修的關係 73 圖2-5-3 訓練、教育和發展的概念架構圖 74 圖2-5-4 大學學務長之多層面壓力來源圖 79 圖3-1-1 大學學生事務主管專業領導力及其發展研究架構圖 106

    中文部分
    王保進(2006)。中文視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。臺北:心理。
    伍定武(1979)。台北市國民中學工藝師能力本位在職教育需要鑑定之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    宋秋儀(譯)(2006)。Yukl, G.著。組織領導學。臺北:華泰文化。
    李育齊(2008)。大學校院學生事務中階主管經營能力與專業發展需求之研究-以北區大學校院為例。台灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    李增祿(1995)。矯治社會工作。載於李增祿(主編),社會工作概論(頁491-507)。臺北:巨流。
    林天印等譯(2005)。Lee G. Bolman, Terrence E. Deal(著)。組織重構:藝術選擇與領導。臺北:五南。
    林如萍(2003)。農業推廣專業人員認定體系及訓練課程發展研究計畫--生活改善專業認定體系之研究。臺北:台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系(行政院農業委員會委託研究)。
    林至善(2006)。我國大學校院學生事務長領導特質、領導行為與領導效能關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系博士論文,未出版,臺北。
    林明地(2002)。學校領導:理念與校長專業生涯。臺北:高等教育。
    姜添輝(2000)。教師專業意識、影響性、社會控制與實質內涵。教育與社會研究,創刊號,1-24。
    徐顯光(譯)(2001)。Maxwell, J.C.著。天生領導:領袖21項特質。臺北:道聲。
    張雪梅(2002)。學生沈淪誰該反省—論新世紀我國大學學生事務工作的新角色、功能與挑戰。學生事務與社團輔導第二輯(頁98-114)。臺北:東吳大學。
    張廣運(2003)。台灣臨床心理師專業發展的比較分析。成功大學行為醫學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南。
    曾淑惠(2006)。評鑑專業化的概念與發展對我國教育評鑑專業化的啟示。教育研究與發展,2(3),171-192。
    黃光雄(1994)。教育概論。臺北:師大書苑。
    楊一鳴(1993)。公務人員在職進修之研究。政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。未出版,臺北。
    楊一鳴,趙傑夫(2006)。學務領導有一套—來自實務界的看法。學生事務理論與實務,45(2~4),32-54。
    楊昌裕(2006)。大學學生事務引導原則與相關因素之研究–學術主管與學務人員的觀點。臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系博士論文,未出版,臺北。
    楊國賜(1985)。教育專業精神之內涵與策進。台灣教育,417,2-5。
    葉連祺(2005)。國小校長領導能力理論、評量和分類的研究。(行政院國家科學委員會題研究計畫成果報告,計畫編號:NSC92-2413-H-260-007)
    葉連祺(2010)。領導能力類型學之初步建構。當代教育研究季刊,18(3),91-124。
    鄭啓川(1991)。成人學習理論應用於人力資源發展教學策略之研究。政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    龍煒璿(2007)。臺灣社會工作概論課本對社會工作專業形象的描繪。東吳大學社會工作學系研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    羅文輝(1996)。新聞事業與新聞人員的專業地位–逐漸形成的專業。台大新聞論壇,1(4),280-292。
    羅竹茜(譯)(1996)。Denis Waitley著。領導自己 : 在知識社會裡培養自我領導力。臺北:麥田。
    龔文廣(1980)。我國職業訓練與技職教育制度溝通配合之研究。政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。未出版,臺北。

    英文部分
    Adams, D. T. (1994). Providing a staff or professional development program with or without money. College Student Affairs Journal, 14(1), 15-21.
    Allen, K. E. (1996). Working toward transformational leadership in higher education. About Campus, 1, 11-15.
    Anderson, C. M. (1993). A case study of the career acquisition and professional experiences of female chief student affairs officers. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Northern Arizona University, Arizona.
    Anderson, G. S. (1998). Enhancing executive selection in student affairs:A profile of effective chief student affairs officers at selected liberal arts college. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Kent State university, Ohio.
    Appleton, J. R. (1978). Pieces of eight. Portland, Oregon:National Association of Student Personnel Administrators.
    Astin, H. S. (1996). Leadership for social change. About Campus, 1, 4-10.
    Baier, J. L. (1979). Competent staff: The critical variable. In M. J. Barr, M. J., & Keating, L. A. (Eds.), Establishing effective programs(pp. 69-83). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Barr, M. J., & Associates. (2000). The handbook of student affairs administration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Barsi, L. M., Hand, B. E., & Kress, J. L. (1985). Training effective student leaders-Back to the basics. NASPA Journal, 22(4), 26-30.
    Bass, B. M. (1981). Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership(rev.ed.). New York:Free Press.
    Bass, B. M. (1991). Bass & Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, & managerial applications (3rd ed). New York:Free Press.
    Belch, H. A., & Strange, C. C. (1995). Views from the bottleneck: Middle managers in student affairs. NASPA Journal, 32(3), 208-222.
    Benke, M., & Disque, C. S.(1990). Moving in, out , up , or nowhere? The mobility of mid-managers. In R. B. Young(Ed.), The invisible leaders: In student affairs mid-managers(pp.14-39). Washington, DC: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators.
    Bensimon, E. M. (1989). The meaning of good presidential leadership: A frame analysis. Review of Higher Education, 12(2), 107-123.
    Bensimon, E., Neuman, A., & Bimbaum,R. (Eds.). (1989). Making sense of administrative leadership: The “L”word in higher education.(Vol.1). Washington, DC: School of Education and Human development, George Washington University.
    Bensimon, E. M. (1990). Viewing the Presidency: perceptual Congruence Between Presidents and Leaders on Their Campuses. Leadership Quarterly, 1, 71-90.
    Bergquist, W. H. (1992). The four cultures of the academy: Insights and strategies for improving leadership in collegiate organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Birnbaum, R. (1988). How college works the cybemetics of academic organization and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
    Blimling, G. S. (1996). The future of student affairs in a post modern era. Journal of the Inidana University Student Personnel Association, 1-23.
    Boland, P. A., Stmatakos, L. C., & Rogers, R. R. ( 1994 ). Reform in student affairs: A critique of student development. Greensboro, NC: ERIC. Counseling and Student Services Clearing House.
    Bolman, L.G., & Deal, T. E. ( 1991). Leadership and management effectiveness: A multi-frame, multi-sector analysis. Human Resource Management, 30, 509-534.
    Bolman, L.G., & Deal, T. E. ( 1997). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. ( 2nd Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
    Bowman, R. L., & Bowman, V. E. (1995). Academic courses to train resident assistants. Journal of College Student Development, 36, 10-20.
    Brodzinski, F. R. (1980). The changing role of the chief student personnel administrator. Journal of College Student Personnel. 2(1), 3-8.
    Brubacher, J. S., & Rudy, W. (1976). Higher education in transition. New York; Harper and Row.
    Brundrett, M. (2000). The question of competence; the origins, strengths and inadequacies of a leadership training paradigm. School Leadership and Management, 20(3), 353-369.
    Bullet, F. (1981). Why certification? Certification and Registration Information. Washington, DC: American Production and Inventory Society.
    Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.
    Carpenter, D. S. (1979). The professional development of student affairs workers: An analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
    Carpenter, D. S. (1990). Professional development and career issues for mid-managers. In R. B.Young (Ed.), The invisible leaders: Student affairs mid-managers (pp. 88-108). Washington, DC: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators.
    Carpenter, D. S., Miller, T. K. & Winston, R. B. (1980). Toward the professionalization of student affairs. NASPA Journal, 18(2), 16-21.
    Cawthon, T.W., McClellan, M.A., Dunn, M.S., & Grandpre, E. A. (2001). The doctoral experience of student affairs administrators. College Student Affairs Journal, 20(2), 64-71.
    Cervero, R. M. (1988). Effective continuing education for professionals. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Clement, L.M., & Rickard, S. T. (1992). Effective leadership in student services: Voices from the field. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Coleman, E. (1997). Leadership in the change process. Liberal Education, 83(1), 4-12.
    Conneely, J. F. (1994). Professional and staff development: Different paradigms. College Student Affairs Journal, 14(1), 5-14.
    Cooper, D. L., Miller, T. K., Saunders, S. A., Chernow, E., & Kulic, K. (1999). Professional development advice from past presidents of ACPA and NASPA. Journal of College Student Development, 40(4), 396-404.
    Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education. ( 2009 ). CAS professional standards for higher education, ( 7th ed. ). Washington, DC: Author.
    Council of Student Personnel Associations in Higher Education( COSPA ). (1975). Student development services in post-secondary education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 16(6), 524-528.
    Creamer, D. G., & Shelton, M. (1988). Staff development: A literature review of graduate preparation and in-service education of student affairs professionals. Journal of College Student Development, 29(5), 407-414.
    Daft, R. L. (2002). The leadership experience(2nd ed.) Orlando, FL: Harcourt College Publishers.
    Daley, B. J. (2000). Learning in professional practice. In V. W. Mott & B. J. Daley (Eds.), Charting a course for continuing professional education: Reframing professional practice(pp. 33-42). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Dandridge, T. C., Mitroff, L., & Joyce, W. F. (1980). Organizational symbolism: A topic to expand organizational analysis. Academy of Management Review, 5(1), 77-82.
    Deal, T. E., & Peterson, K. D. ( 1994). The leadership paradox: Balancing logic and artistry in schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    DeCoster, D. A., & Brown , S. S. (1983). Staff development: Personal and professional education. In T. K. Miller, R. B. Winston, & W. R. Mendenhall( Eds.), Administration and leadership in student affairs: Actualizing student development in higher educationl (pp. 342-373). Muncie, IN: Accelerated Development, Inc.
    Delworth, U., & Hanson, G. R. (Eds.). ( 1989 ). Student services: A handbook for the Profession( 2nd ed. ). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Denzine, G. M. (2001). Making a commitment to professional growth: Realizing the potential of professional portfolios. NASPA Journal, 38(4), 495-509.
    Dickson, D. A. (1987). An analysis of factors perceived to contribute to the influence of chief student affairs officers in four-year colleges and universities. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
    Fey, C. J. (1991). Mid-level student affairs administrators: A study of management skills and professional development needs. Unpublished master dissertation. Texas A & M University, Texas.
    Fey, C. J., & Carpenter, D. S. (1996). Mid-level student affairs administrators: Management skills and professional development needs. NASPA. Journal, 33(3), 218-231.
    Forbes, O. Z. (1984). The middle management professional. In A.F. Kirby, & D. Woodard (Eds.), Career perspectives in student affairs(pp. 35-42). Washington, DC: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators.
    Fox, R., & Radloff, A. (1999). Unstuffing the curriculum to make room for lifelong learning skills. In E. Dunne (Ed.), The learning society(pp. 130-139). London: Kogan Page.
    French, J., & Raven, B. (1959/1996). The bases of social power. In J. M. Shafritz & J. S. Ott (Eds.), Classics of organizational theory ( 4th ed., pp. 375-384). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. ( Original work published 1959).
    Gilley, J. W., & Eggland, S. A. (1989). Principles of Human Resource Development. NY: Addison-Wesley in association with University Associates (Reading, Mass.).
    Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Gold, J. A., & Quatroche, T. J. (1994). Student government: A testing ground for trancsformational leadership. New Directions for Student Services, 66, 31-43.
    Gordon, S. E., Strode, C. B., & Mann, B. A. (1993). The mid-manager in student affairs: What are CSAO’s looking for? NASPA Journal, 30(4), 290-297.
    Gregory, D. E. (1994). Resources for professional/staff development. College Student Affairs Journal, 14(1), 60-72.
    Harder, M. B. (1983). Career patterns of chief student personnel administrators. Journal of College Student Personnel. 24(5), 443-448.
    Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. F. (1996). Teachers’ professional lives: Aspirations and Actualities. In A. Hargreaves & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), Teachers’ professional lives. London: Falmer Press.
    Harway, M. (1977). Management style and philosophy of the student personnel administrator-a profile. Journal of College Student Personnel, 18, 252-260.
    Heimovics, R., Herman, R., & Coughlin, C. (1993). Executive leadership and resource dependence in nonprofit organizations: A frame analysis. Public Administration Review, 53(5), 419-427.
    Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1993). Management of organizational behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
    Hodkinson, H. L. (1970). How dean of students are seen by others and why. National Association of Student Personnel Aministrators Journal. 8(1), 49-54.
    Houle, C. O. (1980). Continuing learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-bass.
    Jablonski, M. (1996). The leadership challenge for women college presidents. Initiatives, 57(4), 1-10.
    Jacobs, T. O. & Jaques, E. (1990). Military executive leadership. In K. E. Clark & M. B. Clark ( Eds.), Measures of Leadership (pp. 281-295). West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America.
    Jacobs, T. O., & Jaques, E. (1987). Leadership in complex systems, In J. Zeidner ( Ed.), Human productivity enhancement: Organizations, personnel, and decision making (vol. 2, pp. 7-65). New York:Praeger.
    James R. A., Channing M. B., & James J. R. ( 1978 ). Pieces of Eight. NASPA Institute of Research and Development.
    Janda, K. F. (1960). Towards the explication of the concept of leadership in terms of the conocept of power. Human Relations, 13, 345-363.
    Jarvis, P. (1983). Professional education. Bekenham, Great Britain: Croom Helm, Ltd.
    Jirasinghe, D., & Lyons, G. (1996). The competent heads’s: A job analysis of heads’s tasks and personality factors. London: Falmer Press.
    Kane, N. E. (1982). A comparative study of student affairs mid-level professionals: Characteristics, perceived skill attainment and need for continued development (Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, 1982). Disseratation Abstracts International, 43(9), 2902A.
    Kanter, R. ( 1984). The change masters: Innovation and entrepreneurship in the American corporation. New York: Simon and Schuster.
    Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
    Kinnick, B. C., & Bolheimer, R. L. (1984). College presidents’ perceptions of student affairs issues and developmental needs of chief student affairs officers. National Association of Student Personnel Administrators, 22(2), 2-9.
    Knock, G. H. (1988). The Philosophical heritage of student affairs. In A.L. Rentz & G.L. Saddlemire(Eds.), Student Affairs Functions in Higher Education. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.
    Kochan, T. A., Schmidt, S. S., & DeCotiis, T. A. (1975). Superior subordinate relations: Leadership and headship. Human Relations, 28, 279-294.
    Komives , S. R., Lucas, N., & McMahon, T. R. (1998). Exploring leadership: For college students who want to make a difference. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    Komives, S. R. (1992). The middles: Observations on professional competence and autonomy. NASPA Journal, 29(2), 83-90.
    Komives, S. R., Woodard D. Jr. (Eds.). (1996). Student services: A handbook for the profession (3rd ed., pp. 435-457). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
    Kram, K. E. (1988). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. New York: University Press of America.
    Kruger, K. (2000). New alternatives for professional education. In M. J. Barr, M. K. Desler, & Associates(Eds.), The handbook of student affairs administration(pp. 535-553). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Lunsford, L.W. (1984). Chief student affairs officer: The ladder to the top. National Association of Student Personnel Administrators, 22(1), 48-56.
    Mahoney, S. (November/December,2000). Who is ready to move up to vice president? A university president shares her views. NASPA Forum, 21.
    McIntire, D. D. ( 1989). Student leadership development: Astudent affairs mandate, NASPA Journal, 27,75-79.
    Merriam, S. B., & Caffarella, R. S. (1999). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide(2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Miller, T. K. (Ed.). (2003). The book of professional standards for higher education 2003(3rd ed. major revision). Washington, DC.:Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education.
    Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York, NY: Harper Collin.
    Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizationsl. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Mott, V. W. (2000). The development of professional expertise in the workforce. In V. W. Mott & B. J. Daley (Eds.), Charting a course for continuing professional education: Reframing professional practice(pp. 23-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Mumford, M. D., Marks, M. A., Connelly, M. S., Zaccaro, S. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2000). Development of leadership skills: Experience and timing. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 87-114.
    Mumford, M. D., & Connelly, M. S. (1991). Leader performance and problem solving in ill-defined domains. Leadership Quarterly, 2, 289-315.
    NASPA ( 2011). Preparing student affairs professionals for future issues in higher education. Retrieved June 13, 2011, from http://naspa.org/programs/profdev/default.cfm
    Ostroth, D. D., Efird, F. D., & Lerman, L. A. (1984). Career patterns of chief student affairs officers. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 443-447.
    Owen , R. (1995). Organizational behavior in education (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    Owens, L. H. (1981). A comparative analysis of the perceived professional development needs of men and women senior-level administrators in higher education. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 1027A.
    Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, T. T. (1991). How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
    Pavalko, R. M. (1971). Sociology of occupations and professions. Itasca, Ill. : F. E. Peacock.
    Penn, J. R. (1990). Mid-management role issues:Expectations, conflicts, and ambiguities. In R.B.Young (Ed.), The invisible leaders:student affairs mid-managers(pp.40-55). Washington, DC: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators.
    Peterson, M.W., & Mets, L. A. (1987). Key resoources on higher education governance, management, and ledership. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
    Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organization. Marshfield, MA. Pitman.
    Piper, T. D., & Fullerton, N. J.(1985). Preparing entry-level professionals for post-entry-level positions. Journal of College Student Personnel, 26(6), 566-567.
    Posner, B. Z., & Brodsky, B. (1993). The leadership practices of effective RAs. Journal of College Student Personnel, 34 (4), 300-304.
    Randall, K. P., & Globetti, E. (1992). Desired competencies of the chief student affairs officer as perceived by college presidents. College Student Affairs Journal. 11(3), 54-61.
    Roberts, C., & Ullom, C. (1989). Studentn leadership program model. NASPA Journal, 27, 67-74.
    Rowden, R. W. (1996). Current realities and future changes. In R. W. Rowden(Ed.), Workplace learning: Debating five critical questions of theory and practice(pp. 3-12). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Sandeen, A. (1991). The chief student affairs officer: Leader, manager, mediator, educator. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
    Sandeen, A. (1996). Organization, functions, and standards of practice. In S. R. Komives & D. B. Woodard, Jr. (Eds.), Student services: a handbook for the profession(3rd ed.) (pp. 435-457).
    Sandeen,A. (2001). Making a difference: Profiles of successful student affairs leaders, National association of Student Personnel Administrators, Inc. (NASPA).U. S. A
    Saunders, S. A., & Cooper, D. L. (1999). The doctorate in student affairs: Essential skills and competencies for midmanagement. Journal of College Student Development, 40(2), 185-191.
    Scanlan, C. L. (1982). Factors deterring allied health professionals from continuing education. In Doctoral Dissertation, Rutgers University. Dissertation Abstracts International. (University Micro-Films International No. 82-13454).
    Scheer, W. E. (1964). Is personnel management a profession? Personnel, 43(5), 225-261.
    Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Retrieved May 28, 2012 from :http://sopper.dk/speciale/arkiv/book49.pdf
    Schreiber, P. J. , Dunkel , N. W., & Jahr, P. K. (1994). Competency based developmental programs. College Student Affairs Journal, 14(1). 23-30.
    Scott, J. E. (2000). Creating effective staff development programs. In M. J. Barr, M. K. desler, & associates(Eds.), The handbook of student affairs administration(pp. 477-491)San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
    Sergiovanni, T., Burlingame, M., Commbs, F., & Thurston, P. ( 1992). Educational governance and administration (3rd ed.) Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    Shandley, T. C. ( 1989). The use of mentors for leadership development. NASPA Journal, 27, 59-66.
    Shay, J. E. (1984). The chief student affairs officer and the president: Revisiting an old issue. NASPA Journal, 22(2), 56-58.
    Spencer, L. M., (1993). Competence at work. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Spencer, L. M., & Spencer , S. M. (1993). Competence at work: Models for superior performance. New York: John Wiley.
    Stogdill, R. M., (1974). Handbook of leadership:A survey of theory and research. New York:Free Press.
    Sullivan, L. G. ( 2001). Four generations of community college leadership. Community College Journal Research and Practice, 25, 559-571.
    Tannenbaum, R., Weshler, I.R., & Massarik, F. (1961). Leadership and organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Trotter , A. & Ellison, L. (1997). Understanding competence and competency. In B. Davies, & L. Ellison, (Eds.), School leadership for the 21st century:A competency and knowledge approach (pp.36-53). London: Routledge.
    Twale , D. J., & Muse, V. (1996). Resident assistant training programs at liberal arts colleges: Pre-service and inservice options and RA perceptions of training. College Student Journal, 30 (3), 404-410.
    Upcraft, M. L. , & Barr, M. J. (1990). Identifying challenges of the future in current practice. In M. J. Barr , M. L. Upcraft, & associates. New future for student affairs: building a vision for professional leadership and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    White, J., Webb, L., & Young , R. B. (1990). Press and stress: A comparative study of institutional factors affecting the work of mid-managers. In R. B. Young(Ed.), The invisible leaders Student affairs mid-managers(pp.56-71). Washington, DC: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators.
    Winston, R. B., & Creamer , D. G. (1997). Improving staffing practices in student affairs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Winston, R. B., Creamer , D. G., Miller , T. K., & Associates(Eds.). ( 2001). The professional student affairs administrator: Educator, Leader, and manager. New York: Brunner-Routledge.
    Winston, R. B., Creamer, D. G. & Miller, T. K. (2001). Preface. In R. B. Winston, D. G. Creamer, T. K. Miller, & Associates(Eds.), The professional student affairs administrator: Educator, Leader, and Manager(pp. ix-xiv). New York: Brunner-Routledge.
    Woodard, Jr., D. B., & Komives, S. R. (2003). Shaping the future. In S.R. Komives, D.B. Woodard, Jr., & Associates ( Eds ), Student services: A handbook for the profession( 4th ed.)(pp.637-655). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Woodward , D .B., Jr. (1994). Leadership challenges. New Directions for Student Services, 66, 91-99.
    Young, R. B. (1990). The invisible Leaders: Student affairs mid-managers. Washington, DC:NASPA.
    Young, R. B. (1990a). Defining student affairs mid-management. In R.B. Young( Ed.), The invisible leaders: Student affairs Mid-managers(pp. 1-13). Washington, DC: National Association of student Personnel Administrators.
    Young, R. B. (1990b). Making the most of mid-management. In R. B. Young( Ed.), The invisible leaders: Student affairs Mid-managers(pp. 131-145). Washington, DC: National Association of student Personnel Administrators.
    Yukl, G. ( 2005). Leadership in organizations( 5th ed. ). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Yukl, G. A. (1981). Leadership in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Zunker, V. G. (1998). Career counseling: Applied concepts of life planning. (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE