- 期刊
Leaders' Experiences and Members' Perceptions of Therapeutic Factors in Three Types of Group Interventions by the ASGW Classification System: A Comparison
ASGW分類系統下三種類型團體之領導者經驗與團體成員治療因素知覺：一個比較研究
摘要
本研究旨在檢視ASGW分類系統下三種類型團體：任務、教育心理與諮商團體之領導者經驗與團體成員治療因素知覺。113 位大學生和7位諮商員參與並完成三類型中的一個團體。依據ASGW分類系統下的三類團體之領導者經驗與團體成員治療因素知覺的質性與量化資料被蒐集並討論。分析結果顯示同樣的治療因素產生在三類型團體中。然而團體間，也發現治療因素的差異。整體而言，諮商團體的成員比教育心理、任務團體的成員覺知更多的治療因素。同時，在某些因素上，教育心理團體的成員比任務團體的成員覺知更多治療因素。最後，治療因素在性別上並未顯示差異。研究結果顯示三種類型團體的共通性與獨特性。上述結果，為建立團體工作者的訓練，提供進一步建立專業標準的一個參考架構。對未來研究與團體實務工作的應用上，本研究亦提出建議。
並列摘要
This study examined leaders' experiences and members' perceptions of therapeutic factors in three types of group treatment in Taiwan: task, psychoeducational, and counseling groups, as classified by the ASGW Classification System. One hundred and thirteen college students and seven counselors participated and completed one of these three types of groups. Qualitative and quantitative results regarding leaders' experiences and members' perceptions of therapeutic factors in each group type were collected and discussed. Analyses revealed that similar therapeutic factors could be produced in three types of groups. However, the differences in the perceived therapeutic factors were found between groups. Overall, the participants in the counseling groups perceived greater therapeutic factors than those in the psychoeducational and the task groups. Meanwhile, the participants in the psychoeducational groups perceived more on certain factors than the task group members. Finally, no gender difference was found on therapeutic factors. The Results reflected both commonality and uniqueness of the three types of groups. It may provide a framework for further establishing the professional standards for group workers training. The implications for future research and group work were suggested.