The Critique of Nishida Kitarô by Sôda Kiichirô: A Metaphysical Issue

左右田喜一郎對西田幾多郎的批判：一個形上學的問題

Michel Dalissier

《臺灣東亞文明研究學刊》 12卷1期 (2015/06) Pp. 65-110

https://doi.org/10.6163/tjeas.2015.12(1)65

摘要

一九二七年，西田幾多郎提筆對左右田喜一郎的批評做出回應，代表他首度以暗示的方式重建他的拓樸學邏輯－筆者會討論這個說法－尤其關係到某種形上學的詭辯。更正面的一點，這篇文章幫助我們釐清他對自康德以降的德國哲學史的理解。以這篇文章為基礎，筆者有意透過這個機會，以英語綜合整理個人在這個領域的詮釋之核心，亦即以絕對虛無的本體論和邏輯之間的差異為主軸。此外，筆者將找出西田幾多郎和梅洛龐帝某些方法之間的關係，尤其是針對「創作」這個觀念。筆者專注探討這篇文章的前兩部分，企圖解開自我覺醒和虛無之間錯綜複雜的概念性關係。首先，筆者會探討從認識論到心理學的巨大改變，重新釐清西多郎和形上學的關係。其次，筆者會重新思考西多郎「征服本體論」的觀念，凸顯出我所謂「拓樸化的初步輪廓」。

關鍵字

西田幾多郎 ； 左右田喜一郎 ； 梅洛－龐帝 ； 場所邏輯 ； 拓樸學邏輯 ； 形上學 ； 認識論 ； 心理學 ； 虛無 ； 自我覺醒 ； 意識 ； 超越 ； 創作

並列摘要

In 1927 Nishida Kitarô wrote a response to the critique of Sôda Kiichirô, represents an unprecedented occasion to rebuild, in a suggestive way, his ＂topological logic＂-an expression to be discussed in this paper-, in particular concerning the quirks of a certain kind of metaphysics. More positively, it helps us to cast some light on his understanding of the history of German Philosophy since Kant. Taking this essay as a cornerstone, I would like to take the opportunity to synthetize, in English, the core of my interpretation in this field, centred on the distinction between ontology, mê-ontology, and logic, if not metaphysics, of absolute nothingness. What is more, I will interrelate certain schemes in Nishida and Merleau-Ponty, especially the idea of ＂making＂. I focus here on the first two sections of the essay, as I attempt to untangle the intricate conceptual relations between self-awakening and nothingness. Firstly, I explore the significant shift from epistemology to psychology, casting a new light on the relation of Nishida to metaphysics. Secondly, I reconsider his idea of overcoming ontology, distinguishing what I call ＂a first sketch of topologization＂.

並列關鍵字

Nishida Kitarô ； Sôda Kiichirô ； Merleau-Ponty ； logic of place ； topological logic ； metaphysics ； epistemology ； psychology ； nothingness ； self-awakening ； consciousness, transcendence ； making

參考文獻

Austin, John Langshaw(2003).How to do Things with Words.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.

Dalissier, M.(2006).The Idea of Mirror in Nishida and Dôgen.Frontiers of Japanese Philosophy.(Frontiers of Japanese Philosophy).:

Dalissier, M.(2007).Unification and Emptiness in Predication. The Stoics, Frege, Quine, Strawson, Nishida Kitarô; History of Logic under a Topological Enlightenment.Philosophia Osaka.2,19-42.

Dalissier, M.(2009).Nishida Kitarô and Chinese Philosophy.Frontiers of Japanese Philosophy 4: Facing the 21st Century.(Frontiers of Japanese Philosophy 4: Facing the 21st Century).:

Dalissier, M.(2010).Nishida Kitarô and Chinese Philosophy. Part 2: Debt and Distance.Japan Review: Journal of the International Research Center for Japanese Studies.22,137-170.