透過您的圖書館登入
IP:13.59.61.119
  • 期刊

CEO Incentives and Bank Liquidity Management

經理人誘因與銀行流動性管理

摘要


We investigate the association between CEO incentives and liquidity policy of commercial banks in the United States from 1992 to 2012. Empirical analyses indicate that CEO incentives affected the liquidity holdings of commercial banks, but the effect was different for S&P 1,500 and non-S&P 1,500 banks. We found that S&P 1,500 banks with higher CEO equity ownership usually had lower proportions of loan commitments, were less involved in non-interest generating activities, but maintained higher levels of liquidity. Our study indicates that S&P 1,500 banks with different level of CEO incentives had different business policies, which affected bank liquidity holdings and bank performance, but this relation was not clear for non-S&P 1,500 banks. Our results complement current understanding of how different CEO incentives affect bank liquidity policy.

並列摘要


本研究利用1992年到2012年美國商業銀行的資料,探討經理人誘因(CEO incentives)與銀行流動性管理的議題。實證分析顯示美國銀行經理人誘因會影響銀行的流動準備,但對S&P 1,500銀行與非S&P 1,500銀行的影響效果不同。CEO持股較高的S&P 1,500銀行,通常承做較低比例的承諾性放款和較多的傳統商業銀行業務,且維持較高的流動性。研究也發現,在S&P 1,500銀行中,不同CEO誘因的會影響銀行的放款決策,進而影響銀行的流動性與營收表現,但此關係在非S&P 1,500銀行中並不明顯。本研究結果有助於進一步瞭解銀行經理人誘因對銀行流動性的影響。

並列關鍵字

銀行流動性 經理人誘因 銀行表現

參考文獻


Acharya, V., and Naqvi, H. 2012. The seeds of a crisis: A theory of bank liquidity and risk taking over the business cycle. Journal of Financial Economics, 106 (2): 349-366.
Acharya, V. V., Shin, H. S., and Yorulmazer, T. 2010. Crisis resolution and bank liquidity. The Review of Financial Studies, 24 (6): 2166-2205.
Ayuso, J., Pérez, D., and Saurina, J. 2004. Are capital buffers pro-cyclical?:Evidence from Spanish panel data. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 13 (2): 249-264.
Barth, J. R., and Bennett, J. T. 1975. Deposit variability and commercial bank cash holdings. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 57 (2): 238-241.
Berger, A. N., and Bouwman, C. H. 2009. Bank liquidity creation. The Review of Financial Studies, 22 (9): 3779-3837.

延伸閱讀