- 期刊
欠缺風險溝通的食品風險治理架構
Deficit risk communication in the food risk governance framework
參考文獻
International Risk Governance Council (IRGC). Introduction to the IRGC Risk Governance Framework, Revised Version. Lausanne: EPFL International Risk Governance Center, 2017. doi:10.5075/epfl-irgc-233739
鄭郁蓁：氟派瑞准用在茶葉食藥署：重啟評估。https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20170322000409-260114?chdtv。引用2019/11/15。Cheng YC. Fluopyram allowed in tea leaves. Taiwan Food and Drug Administration “Reevaluation will be conducted.” Available at: https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20170322000409-260114?chdtv. Accessed November 15, 2019. [In Chinese]
周佑政：套出來了！放寬農藥容許量竟是農藥商提出。https://udn.com/news/story/1/2359977。引用2019/11/15。Chou YC. Secret let slip! The increase in the tolerance level of pesticide residue turned out to be proposed by pesticide suppliers. Available at: https://udn.com/news/story/1/2359977. Accessed November 15, 2019. [In Chinese]
衛生福利部：農藥使用及殘留容許量研商會議專家共識。http://www.mohw.gov.tw/news/645860160。引用2019/11/15。 Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Experts reached an agreement on pesticide use and tolerance residue level in a negotiation meeting. Available at: http://www.mohw.gov.tw/news/645860160. Accessed November 15, 2019. [In Chinese]
衛生福利部食品風險評估諮議會：106年第1次會議會議紀錄。台北：衛生福利部，2017。 Food Safety Risk Assessment Advisory Committee, Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan). Meeting Minutes of the First Meeting in 2017. Taipei: Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan), 2017. [In Chinese]
延伸閱讀
- 蕭寧馨（2014）。再思食品安全問題：風險與責任。校園，56(6)，4-5。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000007-201412-201501120021-201501120021-4-5
- 劉漢梅（2009）。食品安全之風險認知與資訊來源單位信任度之研究〔碩士論文，臺北醫學大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6831/TMU.2009.00137
- 劉清明（2008）。淺探企業風險管理機制。內部稽核，(62)，20-22。https://doi.org/10.7100/IA.200803.0020
- 于樹偉（2006）。Public Sector Risk Management Principles and Framework of Leading Countries。研考雙月刊，30(2)，12-24。https://doi.org/10.6978/YKSYK.200604.0012
- Twyman, M., Harvey, N., & Harries, C. (2008). Trust in Motives, Trust in Competence: Separate Factors Determining the Effectiveness of Risk Communication. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(1), 111-120. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=19302975-200801-201011090009-201011090009-111-120