透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.133.133.178
  • 期刊

Impact of net buying pressure on the trading demand of different types of trader

淨買壓對不同類型交易者的交易需求影響

摘要


This research examines the relation between trading demand and net buying pressure, which reflects the different opinion of traders' expectations. Controlling for the effect of volatility on trading demand, we find that the net buying pressure derived by OTM calls and ATM puts significantly influences the trading demand of hedgers, whereas the trading demand of speculators is affected by the net buying pressure derived by OTM calls. This relationship offers evidence that the greater discrepancy of traders' expectation about future prices implies a lesser desire from both speculators and hedgers to trade. However, when net buying pressure turns larger after the period of the U.S. subprime mortgage crisis, the trading demand of hedgers is greater, while there is no influence on the trading demand of speculators. We conclude that hedgers are more risk-averse and have a greater desire to trade if they find that the imbalance on net buying pressure is larger after a crisis, especially for ATM puts.

並列摘要


本研究探討淨買壓和不同類型交易者需求間的關係,在控制了波動率對交易需求的影響,我們發現價外買權與價平賣權對避險者的需求有顯著的影響,投機者的部分只有對價外買權有影響。當投資人對未來的價格分歧程度越大時,投機者與避險者皆會減少交易的需求。在美國次級房貸危機發生後,我們發現隨著賣權的淨買壓增加,避險者的交易需求也有顯著增加的趨勢,但是對投機者沒有顯著的影響。

並列關鍵字

交易需求 淨買壓 投機者 避險者 波動率

參考文獻


Bates, D. (1991), “The Crash of 87: Was It Expected? The Evidence from Options Markets”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 46, No.3, 1009-1044.
Bates, D. (2000), “Post-’87 Crash Fears in the S&P500 Futures Option Market”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 94, No.1-2,181-238.
Birru, J., and S. Figlewski (2012), “Anatomy of a Meltdown: The Risk-Neutral Density of the S&P 500 in the Fall of 2008”, Journal of Financial Market, Vol.15, No.2, 151-180.
Bollen, N.B., and R.E. Whaley (2004), “Does Net Buying Pressure Affect the Shape of Implied Volatility Functions?”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 59, No.2, 711-54.
Cao, H.H., and H. Ou-Yang (2009), “Differences of Opinion of Public Information and Speculative Trading in Stocks and Options”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 22, No.1, 299-335.

延伸閱讀