中文版多向度完美主義量表之心理計量分析

Psychometric Analyses of the Chinese Version of the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (CMPS): Reliability and Validity

陳正嘉(Cheng-Chia Chen) ； 柯慧貞(Huei-Chen Ko) ； 林旻沛(Min-Pei Lin) ； 周鉦翔(Cheng-Hsiang Chou) ； 陳廣圻(Kuang-Chi Chen)

《中華心理衛生學刊》 24卷1期 (2011/03) Pp. 61-96

https://doi.org/10.30074/FJMH.201103_24(1).0003

摘要

研究目的：本研究旨在修訂中文版多向度完美主義量表，並進行信效度分析；也驗證Frost的六向度完美主義建構與二因素次層結構。根據文獻分析，本研究假設「過度在乎錯誤」、「對行動的懷疑」、「父母批評」及「父母期望」分量表分數，與強迫症狀或憂鬱症狀量尺分數呈低度相關；「個人標準」分量表分數與憂鬱症狀分數及強迫症狀量尺分數呈正相關；而「組織性」分量表分數與憂鬱症狀或強迫症狀分數則無關；並據此進行量表之效標效度分析。研究方法：透過分層叢集取樣，由南區大專校院大學生抽樣有效樣本2,190名；自填中文版多向度完美主義量表、身心健康評估量表。研究結果：全量表內部一致性為.938，分量表內部一致性介於.736~.903，六向度建構及二次層因素建構適配度指標良好，量表與各效標間關係亦支持上述假設。研究結論：中文版多向度完美主義量表具良好之信度、效標關聯效度，並支持Frost的六向度完美主義建構與二因素次層結構模型。

關鍵字

多向度完美主義量表 ； 信度 ； 效度

並列摘要

Purpose: The goals of this study were to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (CMPS), to examine the six-dimensional model of perfectionism with two second-order factors as proposed by Frost, and to explore the relationships among the six dimensions, two second-order factors, depressive symptoms, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Based on a literature review, the following hypotheses were examined: the subscale scores on ”Concern over Mistakes”, ”Doubting of Action”, ”Parental Expectation”, and ”Parental Criticism” had positive relationships with both the depressive and obsessive-compulsive symptom scores; the ”Personal Standard” subscale score had a weak relationship with the depressive and obsessive-compulsive symptoms scores; the ”Organization” subscale score was not correlated with either depressive or obsessive-compulsive symptom scores. Methods: Using stratified and cluster sampling, a total of 2,190 college students (mean age=19.718) were recruited from southern Taiwan and administered the CMPS, Ko Depression Inventory, and Symptoms Check List-90-R. Results: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was .938 for the CMPS and ranged within between .736 and .903 for the subscales. Moreover, the six-dimensional model of perfectionism with two-second order factors had good model-fit evaluations. In addition, the ”Concern over Mistakes”, ”Doubting of Action”, ”Parental Expectation”, and ”Parental Criticism” subscales had positive relationships with the depressive symptom and obsessive-compulsive symptom scores. The ”Personal Standard” subscale score had weak relationships with the depressive and obsessive-compulsive symptoms scores. The ”Organization” subscale score was not correlated with either depressive or obsessive-compulsive symptom scores. Results supported all hypotheses. We also found that males had higher scores than females on ”Parental Expectation” and ”Doubting of Action”. Conclusions: The CMPS is a reliable and valid measurement of perfectionism. Moreover, Frost's six-dimensional model of perfectionism with two second-order structures was supported.

並列關鍵字

multidimensional perfectionism ； reliability ； validity

參考文獻

中華民國教育統計指標(2002)：《高等教育－九十學年度大專校院學生數分析》。台北市：教育部

吳明隆、涂金堂(2005)。SPSS與統計應用分析修訂版。台北:五南出版社。

周裕欽、廖品蘭(1997)。出身背景、教育程度及對子女教育期望之關聯性研究。教育與心理研究。20，313-330。

柯慧貞(1989)。內因性與非內因性憂鬱症在腎上腺皮質素抑制反應、認知偏差及生活壓力上之比較(博士論文)。國立台灣大學心理學研究所。

黃政昌、許慧珊(2007)。實習心理師完美主義量表。台北:心理出版社。