透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.16.79.33
  • 期刊

論刑事訴訟一事不再理-從裁判確定力談起

Study on "ne bis in idem" in Criminal Procedure from the Legal Effect of the Final Judgment

摘要


一事不再理之立意,主要係在避免對於同一行為有多重之追訴,以免發生有雙重處罰之危險。本文從裁判效力,逐步探討與一事不再理有關之程序效應及其基礎的處理模式,同時扼要地探究其判斷核心,即對於同一行為,在學理與實務之間的認定爭議;另外從現行規範與比較法觀點,討論有關如同一案件已受有境外之確定裁判時,其所涉及效力之問題。文末則歸結上述研究內容,建構本文對於一事不再理之完整概念。

並列摘要


The principle of "Ne bis in idem" is in order to avoid multiple prosecution for the same conduct and prevent the risk of double jeopardy. This article is from effectiveness of final judgment to discuss the procedure related to "Ne bis in idem" and its basic executive model, and also to explore the core of judgment, which is the debate on the same conduct between legal theory and legal practice. This article is also from current regulations and comparative law's point of view to discuss the effectiveness of the same case that has been judged by foreign jurisdiction.

參考文獻


Satzger, Helmut、王士帆譯(2014)。國際刑法與歐洲刑法。臺北:元照。
王皇玉(2017)。刑法總則。臺北:新學林。
王效文(2009)。國際刑法轉換為我國內國法之必要性。台灣國際法季刊。6(3),97-124。
朱石炎(2017)。刑事訴訟法論。臺北:三民。
何賴傑(2007)。緩起訴處分之撤銷與再行起訴—最高法院相關判決之評釋。台灣本土法學雜誌。92,93-102。

延伸閱讀