台灣閩南語「都」與「攏」的分工與合併

TO AND LONG IN TAIWANESE SOUTHERN MIN: DIVISION AND MERGING

謝妙玲(Miao-Ling Hsieh) ； 李臻儀(Jen-i Li)

《Taiwan Journal of Linguistics》 17卷1期 (2019/01) Pp. 131-182

https://doi.org/10.6519/TJL.201901_17(1).0004

摘要

台灣閩南語裡的量化副詞「攏long^2」和「都to^1」表全稱義。表任指義的疑問代詞和表個別義的「逐NP」可以和「都to^1」或「攏long^2」合用（句型一）；由「毋管」或「無論」引介的表任指的疑問詞小句，只能使用「攏long^2」（句型二）；表級差的連字句和否定極性成分則須與「都to^1」合用（句型三），惟近來也出現「連」與「攏long^2」合用的情形。本文針對這三種句型進行調查，口述語境，並提示目標語句的前半部，讓120位受訪者完成語句，結果發現，受訪者使用「攏long^2」類多過於「都to^1」類，但受訪者之年齡和台語流利程度也與「攏long^2」及「都to^1」的使用極為相關。因此，本文最後探討從早期閩南語到現代台灣閩南語「都to^1」和「攏long^2」的消長，並提出造成此改變的內外在因素。

關鍵字

全稱量化 ； 級差 ； 連字句 ； 歷時改變 ； 台灣閩南語

並列摘要

The two universal quantifiers, to and long, in Taiwanese Southern Min (TSM) are interchangeable when they occur with a wh-word yielding a free choice reading or with a tak-NP 'each-NP' (pattern 1). In sentences involving put-kuan/bo-lun 'no matter', only long can be used (pattern 2). Still, when the domain involves alternatives arranged on a scale, e.g., in the presence of a focus introduced by lian 'even', or a negative polarity item, to is considered the norm, though the combination of lian and long is sometimes attested (pattern 3). Our sentence completion survey conducted orally is set out to investigate the use of the two quantifiers in the three sentence patterns. We find there is a predominance of the long-type quantifiers in all the three sentence patterns, and the use of long and to correlates with the spearkers' age and proficiency level of TSM. Finally, for a better understanding of the change, we compare the use of the two quantifiers in earlier Southern Min texts and modern TSM texts and discuss some potential internal/external causes for the change.

並列關鍵字

universal quantifier ； scale ； lian sentence ； historical change ； Taiwan Southern Min

參考文獻

董秀芳. 2002.〈“都”的指向目標及相關問題〉，《中國語文》6:495-507。Dong, Xiufang. 2002. On targets of dou and some related issues. Studies of the Chinese Language 6:495-507.

蔣靜. 2003.〈“都”總括全量手段的演變及其分類〉，《漢語學習》4:72-76。Jiang, Jing. 2003. Evolution of dou as a means of generalizing universal quantification and its category. Chinese Language Learning 4:72-76.

蔣靜忠、潘海華. 2013.〈“都”的語義分合及解釋規則〉，《中國語文》1:38-50。Jiang, Jingzhong and Haihua Pan. 2013. How many dous do we really need? Studies of the Chinese Language 1:38-50.

蔣嚴. 1998.〈語用推理與“都”的句法/語義特徵〉，《現代外語》1:10-24。Jiang, Yan. 1998. Pragmatic reasoning and syntactic/semantic characterization of dou. Modern Foreign Languages 1:10-24.

蔣嚴. 2009.〈梯級模型與“都”的語義刻畫〉，程工、劉丹青主編《漢語的形式與功能研究》，123-132。北京：商務印書館。Jiang, Yan. 2009. Scalar model and the semantic characterization of dou. In Formal and Functional Studies in Chinese, ed. by Gong Cheng, and Danqing Liu, pp.123-132. Beijing: The Commercial Press.