本研究之主要目的在瞭解高雄市國民中學教師自我效能感與輔導中輟生態度的關係。亦比較不同教師之背景變項在自我效能感及輔導中輟生態度的差異情況。 本研究採用調查研究法之問卷調查方式獲取研究資料,先以分層抽樣方式,依學校班級數佔全高雄市全部班級數之比例來決定每校的樣本數,再以立意抽樣的方式,選取各校從事中輟生輔導服務的教師進行調查。共選取400位高雄市國中教師作為研究樣本,有效回收率為73.25%。本研究以描述性統計、因素分析、t檢定、單因子變異數分析及皮爾森積差相關等統計方法對研究資料進行分析,主要發現如下: 一、年齡、任教年資、擔任職務、輔導過之中輟生人數、最高教育程度、任教領域等個人特質在教師自我效能感上呈現顯著差異,性別方面則無顯著差異。 二、校長領導方式、在職訓練、工作勝任感、與學校同事互動關係、與中輟生互動關係、與中輟生家長互動關係、家人支持程度、朋友支持程度、社會資源支持程度等學校環境特質均在教師自我效能感上呈現顯著差異。 三、年齡、任教年資、擔任職務、輔導過之中輟生人數、最高教育程度、任教領域等個人特質在教師輔導中輟生態度上呈現顯著差異,性別方面則無顯著差異。 四、校長領導方式、在職訓練、工作勝任感、與中輟生互動關係、與中輟生家長互動關係、家人支持程度、朋友支持程度、社會資源支持程度等學校環境特質均在教師輔導中輟生態度上呈現顯著差異,與同事互動關係方面則無顯著差異。 五、高雄市國中教師自我效能感為正向傾向,高雄市國中教師輔導中輟生態度為正向傾向,且兩者具顯著正相關。 針對以上初步發現,本研究亦提出相關之建議以供參考。
The main purpose of this study is to explore the relation between the attitude toward counseling dropouts and the self-efficacy of junior high school teachers in Kaohsiung. Besides, this study also compares the variances of teachers’ personal background with their self-efficacy and the attitude toward counseling the dropouts. The method of this study is based on survey research. The subjects in the study constituted of 400 junior high school teachers in Kaohsiung, which sampling according to the school ration of the Kaohsiung junior high schools. Finally, 302 questionnaires were returned, and 293 of them were valid. The return rate of the samples is 73.25 percent. The data were analyzed by utilizing the static methods of frequency distribution, factor analysis, T-test, ANOVA and Pearson’s Product-Moment Correlation. The conclusions of the above study are as follows: 1.There are significant differences between individual characteristics and self-efficacy in different ages, work seniority, positions, the number of cases, educational levels and teaching fields. 2.There are significant differences between organizational characteristics and self-efficacy in different leadership styles of schoolmaster, on-the-job trainings, competence, interaction with colleagues, interaction with dropouts, interaction with dropouts’ family, familial support, friends’ support and social resources obtainable. 3.There are significant differences between individual characteristics and the attitude toward counseling dropouts in different ages, work seniority, positions, the number of cases, educational levels and teaching fields. 4.There are significant differences between organizational characteristics and the attitude toward counseling dropouts in different leadership styles of schoolmaster, on-the-job trainings, competence, interaction with dropouts, interaction with dropouts’ family, familial support, friends’ support and social resources obtainable. 5.Both the teacher’s self-efficacy and attitude toward counseling dropouts are tested positively, and there is significant correlation between them. According to the empirical research, the researcher proposes some suggestions as reference.