聖經、儒林外史和水滸傳女英雄特色比較之研究

A Comparative Study of Heroines in The Bible, The Scholars and The Marshes of Mount Liang

彭名蘂(Ming-Jui Peng)

指導教授 ： 周曉青

國立暨南國際大學/人文學院/外國語文學系/碩士(2018年)

摘要

這篇論文的題目是聖經、儒林外史和水滸傳女英雄特色對照之研究。聖經是一部關於人類起源的神話，是男性下的產物，所以聖經中的女性受到很多限制。聖經、儒林外史和水滸傳中的女性在當時是不符合女性必備條件，但在我眼裡是可敬的！文本都男性產物下的產物，但女性卻扮演關鍵性角色。該論文的主要目的是打破一般英雄人物都是男性的迷思。本文主旨在探討女英雄在聖經文學和中國小說中相同與不同的地方。本論文利用文本分析來討論聖經文學和中國小說中兩個文本中女英雄的存在和塑造，最後將兩者比較和對照。

關鍵字

女性 ； 女英雄 ； 英雄 ； 聖經文學 ； 聖經 ； 水滸傳 ； 儒林外史 ； 父權體制

並列摘要

As the title of this essay expresses, this is a study on the characteristics of heroines featured in The Bible, The Scholars and The Marshes of Mount Liang. The Bible is the written product of men, so there are many restrictions on women in The Bible. Some women did not fulfill the requirements of women in the Bible, The Scholars and The Marshes of Mount Liang in earlier times, but were respectable in my opinion! The descriptions are mostly male-dominated in the text, but women also play key roles. The primary purpose of this thesis was to focus on breaking the myth that all ordinary heroes were male. The thesis aimed to explore the similarities and differences between heroines in biblical literature and Chinese novels. This thesis used textual analysis to discuss the existence and creation of female heroes in two texts of biblical literature and Chinese novels. Finally, I compare and contrast them.

並列關鍵字

Woman ； Heroine ； Hero ； Biblical Literature ； The Bible ； The Marshes of Mount Liang ； The Scholars ； Patriarchal System

參考文獻

Beauvoir, Simon De. The Second Sex. H. M. Parshley, tr. & ed. New York: Vintage, 1989.

Bohn, Babette. “Esther As a Model For Female Autonomy In Northern Italian Art.” Studies in Iconography 23 (2002): 183-201.

Cheng, Xiaojuan. “Feminist Interpretation and Female Positioning in The Bible.” Journal of Henan University (Social Science) 47. 3 (2007): 17-19.

Fan, Peng-Rui. “Prickly Rose, Thoroughly Displaying - Analysis of Characters in Shen Qiongzhi in The Scholars.” Modern Chinese 1 (2007): 39-40.

Fuchs, Esther. “Reclaiming the Hebrew Bible for Women: The Neoliberal Turn in Contemporary Feminist Scholarship.” Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 24. 2 (2008): 45-65.