This research applies ”Evolutionary Game Theory” to analyze the interactions among the public sectors, the environmental protection organizations, and local residents in movement of ecological reservation (RMER). Furthermore, this study also investigates what types of the strategies that the participants should adopt in order to achieve the ”Best Response Strategies” under various decision-making circumstances. The major finding of this research is that Evolution Game Theory can provide better explanations on both the interrelationships between resisters, and between resisters and public sectors than the Rational Game Theory. This study also suggests several alternatives such as ”Hearing” and ”Civic Lawsuit” for RMER's future development, and perhaps, the possibility of replacing administrative procedures with arbitration.