透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.133.12.172
  • 期刊

文言文閱讀理解歷程探究

The Comprehension Process of Reading Classic Chinese Texts

摘要


本研究探討國中生閱讀文言文時的理解歷程,分析閱讀理解時的困難點,找出可能增進理解文言文本的方法,提供文言文閱讀教學時參考。研究採用放聲思考原案分析法,對象為基隆市某中學六位九年級學生,請其以放聲思考方式閱讀並解釋文言文本,再填寫讀後回饋問卷。得到研究結果如下:(1)國中生閱讀文言文時呈現四種理解歷程,分別是「拆解詞義」、「統整句意」、「深化理解」和「修正理解」。(2)「統整句意」的理解歷程出現次數最多,「拆解詞義」的理解歷程則在不能順利統整句意時才會出現。(3)「深化理解」和「修正理解」的理解歷程皆是以統整句意為基礎發展而來,有助於提升理解成效但卻鮮少出現。(4)生難字詞是國中生閱讀文言文時最感困難的部份,詞語歧義與省略句則最易引發意義混淆造成理解錯誤。因此建議進行文言文閱讀教學時,除了有效增加學子的詞彙量與文本相關的背景知識之外,可讓學子學會運用推論思考和後設認知思考的技巧自主閱讀文言文本,以增進對文言文的閱讀理解能力。

並列摘要


This study explores ninth grade students' classic-Chinese reading comprehension processes, analyzes their comprehension difficulties, and finds out approaches to enhance the comprehension. Six ninth grade students at Keelung City participated in this study. Think-aloud protocols and feedback questionnaire were used to collect qualitative data. The results show that: (1) Four comprehension processes, including sentence meaning conjecture, word explanation, comprehension deepening, and comprehension correction, were observed in classic Chinese reading. (2) The frequency of sentence meaning conjecture is highest among the four processes. However, when the readers have difficulty to understand the meaning of the sentence, they adopt the process of word explanation. (3) Although the processes of comprehension deepening and comprehension correction can enhance understanding, they were seldom used. (4) The word recognition is the most difficult part of classic Chinese reading, and the lexical ambiguity and elliptical sentences always cause misunderstanding easily. This study suggests that Classic Chinese teaching should not only give vocabulary and background knowledge, but also encourage students to read classical Chinese texts independently and practice inferential comprehension and meta-cognitive thinking skills.

參考文獻


李清筠(2013)。古典散文教學重點與方法─從《兒時記趣》出發。中等教育。64(3),52-66。
張馨如(2011)。九年一貫古典文學教材之研究。中等教育。61(2),94-121。
Chall, J. S.(1996).Stages of reading development.Fort Worth, TX:Harcourt Brace.
Edwards, V.(ed.),Corson, D.(ed.)(1997).Encyclopedia of Language and Education.Amsterdam:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ericsson, K. Anders,Simon, Herbert A.(1993).Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports As Data.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.

被引用紀錄


王雅眉(2016)。推論策略融入文言文教學對國中生閱讀理解之影響〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614055145
程芷萱(2016)。排版模式對文言文閱讀之影響〔碩士論文,國立交通大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0030-0803201714375953
陳懿容(2017)。運用認知語言學為高中學生搭建閱讀詩的認知階梯〔碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0016-0401201816100125

延伸閱讀