唐代法寶法師思想探微

法寶法師，在玄奘大師座下，是位異類學子，曾因「非想見惑」事質難師長，豈可用「凡語增加聖言量」？在弘揚「三乘究竟」論的唯識學園裡，卻堅持眾生皆可成佛的「一乘究竟」論；於所著《俱舍論疏》中，又每每批評同門普光《俱舍論記》之謬誤。如此，在在顯示法寶的特殊性格。本文，筆者從法寶的學思意趣、法寶與同儕的諍議、異域學者對《俱舍論》註之迴響等三個面向探討，說明法寶依如來藏學思想，闡揚《一乘佛性究竟論》，自然異於玄奘唯識學；普光與法寶《俱舍論》註各有專擅，二人論註之異同，大抵是從《婆沙論》以來，論師及論書意見分歧的影響所致；至於日本法幢之評論，則是引證教典來源、部類之認知差異，皆未涉及義理問題。

關鍵字

法寶；玄奘；俱舍論疏；一乘佛性究竟論

並列摘要

Venerable Fa-bao, during being the student of Master Hsuan-chuang, is a peculiar student. Once he raised a question of ＂no-thinking view confusions＂ for his teacher, and raised the doubt for his teacher again for how the secular language being added to the words of Buddha. In the circle of promoting ＂three vehicles of achieving Buddhihood,＂ he insisted ＂one vehicle to achieving Buddhihood;＂ Besides, in his Explanation of Abhidharma Kosa, he often points out mistakes or fallacy of Notes for Abhidharma Kosa, written by his fellow, Pu-guang. All of these shows Fa-bow's special disposition. In this paper, the author explores from three points of view: Venerable Fa-bow's thought, disputes between Fa-bow and his peers, and reflections from foreign researchers on the notes of Abhidharma Kosa. The author elaborates that based on the thought of Tathagatagarbha, Fa-bow promotes On One Vehicle to the Buddha-nature, naturally different from the Consciousness studies of Master Hsuan-chuang. Both Puguang and Fa-bow have special viewpoints in their notes on Abhidharma Kosa. The disagreements and similarities of their books probably came from the influence of their predecessor criticists since the disagreements over Abhidharma Vibhasa. As for the comments from the Japanese researcher, Ven Fa-chuang, are not involved the meaning of dharma; he just presents discovery and verification of the sources of citations, and different cognitive differences over the categories of literature source of sutras.