建立具都市化特徵的氣候變遷調適能力指標

Incorporating the Effect of Urbanization in Measuring Climate Adaptive Capacity

朱驊(Andrea H Chu)

指導教授 ： 闕蓓德

國立臺灣大學/工學院/環境工程學研究所/碩士(2016年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201600887

摘要

氣候變遷調適能力的評估可用以推估當地政府與人民在未來面對氣候變遷影響時，是否能採行足夠且適當的調適措施。但目前相關指標的發展並未考量都市化對調適措施的影響，因此可能會高估調適能力。本研究目的為建立氣候變遷調適能力指標系統，該系統中納入與都市化相關指標 如：建設面積和教育程度，並設定三種社會經濟發展情境，包括：基線 (情境BAU，Business As Usual)、重視經濟發展(情境 A) 及重視環境與社會 (情境 B)；以期能提高氣候變遷調適能力評估的準確性，並可供地方發展與規劃之參考。以美國佛羅里達洲的West Palm Beach和臺灣新北市的淡水區為研究案例，使用土地利用模擬軟體What if，分別模擬三種社會經濟發展情境，於2030年及2050年之土地利用狀況；並將結果輸入本研究所建立之指標系統計，以推估兩地的氣候變遷調適能力。在West Palm Beach，情境A在2030年的調適能力為三者最高，然而在2050年的則降低為各情境中最低；情境BAU與情境A類似，但起伏的程度較小；情境B在2030年和2050年的分數都呈逐步上升，並於2050年具有最佳的氣候變遷調適能力。淡水區的趨勢測不同於West Palm Beach，從基準年起三個情境的調適能力都會下降，但以情境B降低的幅度較小。綜合而言，情境A是短期最佳的發展方向，不過以長期來看會有調適能力的限制，而情境B雖然發展較慢，但到2050年會有較高的氣候變遷調適能力。本研究可做為當地政府規劃未來發展的參考。

關鍵字

都市化 ； 土地利用變遷 ； 氣候變遷 ； 調適能力 ； 調適

並列摘要

Measuring the ability of a community to face climatic changes, or its adaptive capacity, is necessary in order to plan and guide development as the global climate continues to warm. One factor that has not been thoroughly addressed by previous attempts at measuring adaptive capacity is urbanization. This study looks to measure adaptive capacity in relation to urbanization, as many areas of the world are undergoing this rapid transition. An indicator system was created with land-use sensitive measures and applied to three different land use projection scenarios (high, medium, and low growth) to 2030 and 2050 for two case study areas, Tamsui, Taiwan and West Palm Beach, USA. In Tamsui, the adaptive capacity decreased in all scenarios, but most dramatically for the high growth scenario. The low growth scenario decreased more slowly through each time slice. For West Palm Beach, the high growth scenario had the highest score in 2030, but declined in 2050. The medium growth Scenario BAU, also had a higher adaptive capacity score in 2030 than in 2050. The low growth Scenario B had a score that improved less dramatically but continued to rise through 2050. Scenario A would be ideal for short term gains, but its benefits would plateau in the long term. Scenario B, with conservation measures and more restricted growth would be the most ideal alternative. This study shows that urbanization has short term socioeconomic gains, but long term environmental consequences, and it successfully incorporates the effect of land use change into an adaptive capacity indicator system and can be used in other localities expecting significant increases in urbanization.

並列關鍵字

urbanization ； land use change ； climate change ； adaptive capacity ； adaptation

參考文獻

Abildtrup J, Audsley E, Fekete-Farkas M, et al (2006) Socio-economic scenario development for the assessment of climate change impacts on agricultural land use: a pairwise comparison approach. Environ Sci Policy 9:101–115. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2005.11.002

Acosta L, Klein RJT, Reidsma P, et al (2013) A spatially explicit scenario-driven model of adaptive capacity to global change in Europe. Glob Environ Chang 23:1211–1224. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.008

Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16:268–281. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006

Ahsan MN, Warner J (2014) The socioeconomic vulnerability index: A pragmatic approach for assessing climate change led risks-A case study in the south-western coastal Bangladesh. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 8:32–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.009

Beggs JJ, Haines VA, Hurlbert J (2010) Revisiting the rural-urban contrast: personal networks in nonmetropolitan and metropolitan Setting. Rural Sociol 61:306–325.