未遂犯的處罰依據其及影響

The Punishment Foundation of Attempts and its Influence

蕭宏宜(Hung-Yi Hsiao)

《東海大學法學研究》 45期 (2015/04) Pp. 37-98

摘要

為什麼處罰要處罰未遂行為的問題，在刑法學界的討論已經超過百年。實際上，這個問題與刑罰目的理論、不法理論均有緊密的關聯，並且，在這樣的關聯中清晰地展現出未遂理論過去和現在的歷史變化。本文試圖釐清未遂犯的處罰依據，並說明行為無危險的不能未遂，連著手都沒有，觀念上根本不是未遂犯，不構成犯罪。

關鍵字

未遂 ； 客觀未遂理論 ； 主觀未遂理論 ； 實行行為 ； 不能未遂

並列摘要

The question that why punish the crime of attempt have discussed more than hundred years and have long occupied the imaginations of scholars of criminal laws. Actually, the issues involved are here the fundamental issues of theories of purpose of punishment and Unlawfulness. In order to understand the theoretical history of the issues and the Stand of today's discussion in Germany and U.S. as well as the focus shall be shifted toward and the possibility of development in the future, it is necessary to introduce and outline the history of theoretical challenges and developments of punishing the crime of attempt. This article discusses the concept and characteristics of attempting to commit an offense, and then analyzes the incapable attempted crime (impossible attempt). Finally, I argued that due to lake of formal and essential characteristics of a crime, attempt of imposibility is not a crime and should not be punished.

並列關鍵字

Attempt ； Objective Theory of Attempt ； Subjective Theory of Attempt ； Perpetrating Act ； Attempt of Impossibility

參考文獻

王乃彥(2005)。未遂犯處罰界限之研究。臺北大學法研所=Institute of Law, National Taipei University。

甘添貴、謝庭晃(2006)。捷徑刑法總論。瑞興=Jui-Hsing。

余振華(2001)。刑法違法性理論。元照=Angle。

余振華(2005)。刑法深思．深思刑法。元照=Angle。

余振華(2013)。刑法總論。三民=Sanmin。