少年性侵害行為人靜態再犯危險評估量表之確認與效度檢驗

Confirmation and Validation of the Static Recidivism Risk Assessment Scale for Juvenile Sexual Offenders

邱惟眞(Wei-Chen Chiu) ； 簡良霖(Liang-Lin Chien)

《性學研究》 14卷1期 (2023/07) Pp. 1-14

https://doi.org/10.6206/SIS.202307_14(1).0001

摘要

研究目的：本研究旨在依據第一版「少年靜態再犯危險評估量表」（J-SRRAS）進行實徵資料的蒐集，並根據實徵資料提供的訊息，進行量表的確認及效度的檢驗。研究方法：本研究採用橫斷性研究設計，並使用立意取樣法進行樣本收案。樣本包括初犯組與再犯組，共計304人與36人，針對性侵初犯與再犯進行差異分析。根據比較分析的結果，重新整理量表的項目與計分方式，並進行受試者操作特徵分析（receiver operating characteristic analysis），以確認量表的同時效度。完成第二版的J-SRRAS後，再以靜態因素九九評估表（Static-99）作為效標，進行效標關聯效度的檢驗。研究結果：研究結果顯示，J-SRRAS具有同時效度（AUC=0.79）以及效標關聯效度（r=.43），在區分台灣少年性侵初犯與再犯組方面，甚至比Static-99更準確。研究結論：本研究所發展的J-SRRAS量表可作為台灣少年性侵再犯危險評估的參考工具。

關鍵字

少年 ； 性侵害 ； 再犯危險評估 ； 效度

並列摘要

Purpose: This study aims to validate the first edition of the "Juvenile Static Recidivism Risk Assessment Scale" (J-SRRAS) through empirical data collection and analysis. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using purposive sampling to collect cases, including 304 first-offender and 36 recidivism cases of juvenile sexual offenders. The J-SRRAS items and scoring methods were reorganized based on collected data, followed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to confirm the concurrent validity of the scale. The second edition of J-SRRAS was then developed, and criterion-related validity was tested using Static-99 as the criterion. Results: The J-SRRAS demonstrated concurrent validity (AUC = 0.79) and criterion-related validity (r = .43). Additionally, J-SRRAS was more accurate than Static-99 in distinguishing between first-time offenders and juvenile sexual assault groups. Conclusions: J-SRRAS is a valid tool for assessing the risk of recidivism in juvenile sexual offenders in Taiwan.

並列關鍵字

Juvenile ； Sexual Offence ； Recidivism Risk Assessment ； Validity

參考文獻

林明傑、黃冠豪（2017）。少年性侵者再犯危險評估量表之台灣常模初探及其與病態人格量表之相關研究。性學研究，8(1)，1-31。https://doi.org/10.620 6/SIS.2017.0801.01。

林明傑、董子毅（2005）。台灣性罪犯靜態再犯危險評估量表（TSOSRAS）之建立及其外在效度之研究。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，1(1)，49-110。https://doi.org/10.29804/AJDVSO.200512.0003。

Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., & Cormier, C. A. (2015). Mentally disordered and other violent offenders. In G. T. Harris, M. E. Rice, V. L. Quinsey, & C. A. Cormier (Eds.), Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (pp. 63-91). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 14572-004。

Viljoen, J. L., Mordell, S., & Beneteau, J. L. (2012). Prediction of adolescent sexual reoffending: A meta-analysis of the J-SOAP-II, ERASOR, J-SORRAT-II, and Static-99. Law and Human Behavior, 36(5), 423-438. https://doi.org/10.10 37/h0093938。

Viljoen, J. L., Scalora, M., Cuadra, L., Bader, S., Chávez, V., Ullman, D., & Lawrence, L. (2008). Assessing risk for violence in adolescents who have sexually offended: A comparison of the J-SOAP-II, J-SORRAT-II, and SAVRY. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/009385480 7307521。