作者由實務工作經驗觀察,在家庭暴力被害人服務中,年長者求助案件增多,他們的暴力類型多為卑親屬對尊親屬的暴力,面對此等情境,對簿公堂對任何一方都是很大的衝擊,然而年長者採取司法行動的意願其實並不高。因此本研究期待透過家暴服務處所服務的個案資料,了解受暴老人聲請保護令卻又撤回的原因,了解受暴老人與相對人的暴力樣態及關係,同時也了解相對人的特性,並探討受暴老人撤回保護令的原因及其面對暴力的因應策略為何。本研究以雲林縣受暴老人的經驗為例,採取次級資料分析的方式來整理2016年雲林縣家庭暴力事件服務處的個案記錄。該單位於2016 年協助保護令聲請的開案案件共計742 案,其中35 案是受暴老人聲請保護令但最後撤回的案件,透過這35 件個案記錄進行資料整理與分析。本研究發現相對人多為個案的兒子及先生,他們多數是同住的狀態,關係緊密使得暴力的發生更為頻繁。但一半的個案自評處境是不怎麼危險,25.7%的個案則認為自己的處境是有些危險,但他們的支持系統多為子女,其次為配偶,再者則是沒有支持系統。而個案保護令撤回原因主要是事證不明顯,其次為相對人予以道歉或給相對人一個機會以及致暴因素減緩。本研究由系統觀點來思考處遇策略,即微視系統的個人層面,受暴老人本身可以明白保護令所產生的保護作用及意義,設立個人人身安全計劃及措施,而中介系統的社區層面,可以建構緊密的以社區為基礎的防暴機制,強化對弱勢老人的安全防護系統,鉅視系統的文化社會層面,可以推廣對暴力的認知,強化對暴力零容忍、尊重每個生命個體的價值。
Through the observation of the practice work, the elder abuse is getting more. The violence type is almost the younger relatives against the older relatives. As the situation, it's a great attack to sue. The study wants to analyze the violence type, the characteristics of the offender, the withdrawal reasons of the protection orders of the abused elders. The author takes the second data analysis to get the research outcome and the data is from the Council for Victims of Domestic Violence of Yunlin County in 2016. The total case record is 742, 35 of 742 is the withdrawal cases of the protection orders of the abused elders. We collect and analyze the data though the 35 case records. The findings is the offender is the son or husband of the clients, and they usually live together. The closeness makes the clients get violence frequently, and half of the clients don't think they are in dangerous situation and 25.7% of the clients think they are a little dangerous. The support system is the son and daughter or the spouse. Some of the client have no support system. The reason of withdrawal is lack of evidence, forgiving the offender, and the reducing of dangerous situation. The suggestions of the study focus the system perspectives. In the micro systems, the social workers should tell the abused elders about the meaning of the protection orders, how they get protection from the law, how to collect the evidence, and the safety plans. In the meso systems, we should build a community-based mechanism to prevent the violence and enhance the safety protection system of abused elders. In the macro systems, we should reduce the neglect of abused elder, zero tolerance to violence, and respect the value of individuals.