透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.238.71.155
  • Journals

查核風格與財務報表可比較性:會計師事務所組別之探討

Audit Style and Financial Statement Comparability: A Perspective of Audit Groups in the Big 4 Accounting Firms

Abstracts


企業財務報表品質與各界報表使用者息息相關,近年來財務報表間是否具備可比較性逐漸成為一項備受重視的議題,本研究旨在探討查核工作與財務報表可比較性間之關聯。本研究以國內2013年至2015年四大會計師事務所查核之上市櫃公司為研究對象,將同年度及同產業之樣本相互配對,使用裁決性應計數之差異取絕對值作為財務報表可比較性的代理變數。實證結果顯示,事務所整體查核風格會影響財務報表可比較性,本研究進一步將觀察層級向下延伸至四大事務所內部組別,發現在控制組別多樣性因素後,同一事務所組別所查核之財務報表,會有較高之可比較性。本研究顯示以國內審計環境作為觀察對象的情況下,和查核工作更為密切的單位—組別,會擁有更一致的查核風格。

Parallel abstracts


The quality of corporate financial statements is closely related to how they are compiled and audited by all users involved in their preparation. Recently, the comparability of financial statements has drawn great attention. This study aims to explore the relevance of audit work and financial statement comparability by examining Taiwan's listed companies audited by the Big 4 from 2013 to 2015. The empirical results illustrate that the overall audit styles of different accounting firms affect the comparability of financial statements. Specifically, the Big 4 have different audit styles from each other. This study focuses on the audit groups within the accounting firms and investigates the association between the audit groups and financial statement comparability. The results indicate that the same audit group will yield higher comparability after controlling the diversity of the group.

References


李建然與林秀鳳,2013,大型會計師事務所之審計品質真的比非大型會計師事務所好嗎?從抑制盈餘管理的角度探討—控制自我選擇偏誤的重要性,中華會計學刊,9 卷(1 期):頁 77-110。
李建然與陳政芳,2004,審計客戶重要性與盈餘管理:以五大事務所組別為觀察標的,會計評論,38 期:頁 59-80。
李貴富,2018,查核品質屬性、財務報表可比性與投資效率,台大管理論叢,28 卷(2期):頁 129-164。
周玲台、張謙恆與范懿心,2014,安侯建業(KPMG Taiwan):全球化下之管理變革(B)。台北:台灣管理個案中心。
周啟東,2003,王永慶的會計師帶兵集體跳槽,商業周刊,804 期:頁 30-32。

Cited by


陳美惠、謝安軒、張祐慈、戚務君(2021)。關鍵查核事項是制式八股文嗎?中華會計學刊17(2),183-244。https://doi.org/10.6538/TAR.202112_17(2).0001

Read-around