透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.133.131.110
  • 學位論文

衡量SaaS服務品質之多構面量表

A Multidimentional Scale for the Evaluation of Saas Service Quality

指導教授 : 翁崇雄

摘要


隨著網際網路快速的發展與普及,雲端運算技術開始受到產學兩界的關注,軟體即服務(Software as a Service,簡稱SaaS)將軟體以服務的概念來開發、傳遞、收費的模式逐漸受到重視與採用。儘管如此,過去資訊服務服務品質相關的研究多半著重在網站品質上,少有對於SaaS服務服務品質之研究,因此本研究嘗試進行SaaS服務服務品質衡量模式之探討。 本研究從SaaS相關的研究中彙整出其服務特性,並結合Parasuraman等學者於2005年發展的E-S-QUAL量表,建構出SaaS服務服務品質的原始構面,並從這些構面發展出對應的問項且以問卷調查的方式進行了問項的驗證工作。 問卷的精簡工作是依據Parasuraman、Zeithmal、Berry於1988年發展SERVQUAL量表的整個程序進行,經過此程序,原始問卷被精簡成一份含有25道題目、5個構面的量表,再經過信度、效度的檢驗,證實這是一份適合用來衡量SaaS服務服務品質的量表。

並列摘要


As the maturity and population of Internet grow , the cloud computing gains great attention by both the industrial and academic . The business model of SaaS (software as a service) , the concept of developing , delivering , charging software as a service begins to gain importance and introduce . Nevertheless , most of the research on information service quality focus on website quality , rarely works on SaaS . This study endeavors to develop a measurement model for the evaluation of the service quality of SaaS. This study summarizes the characteristics of SaaS service from relevant researches , and combines Parasuraman’s 2005 E-S-QUAL study to develop the original dimensions for measuring the service quality of SaaS service. This study generates corresponding items from original dimensions , and uses questionnaire to perform the verification of these items. According to the developing process of SERVQUAL scale in service quality, which used by Parasuraman, Zeithmal, Berry in 1988, this study do the task of scale purification. After this process, it develops a scale including twenty-five items and five dimensions. Through reliability and validity analysis, it also proofs that the scale can be used to measure the service quality of SaaS service.

參考文獻


6. Chang, H.-H., & Chen, F.-P. (2010). The Influence of E-S-QUAL’s Dimensions on Customer Satisfaction and Purchase Intentions – the Case of Technology University Students. Electronic Commerce Studies, 8(3), 379-406.
3. Bloemer, J., Ruyter, K., & Wetzels, M. (1998). Linking perceived service quality and service loyalty : a multi-dimensional perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 33, 1082-1106.
4. Bennett, R., & Robinson, S. (2000).Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349-360.
9. Churchill, G. (1979). A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. Journal of Marketing, 16(1), 64-73.
10. Cronin, J., & Taylor, S.(1992). Measuring Service Quality : A Reexamination and Extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55-68.

被引用紀錄


呂育霖(2016)。以計費模式及安全性探討企業接受雲端運算服務意願之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2016.00652
王俊懿(2013)。誰願意付費?在免費增值商業模式下,如何使雲端軟體的免費用戶成為付費客戶。〔碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6843/NTHU.2013.00481
洪瑀岑(2016)。探討房屋仲介從業人員對雲端服務滿意度之影響因素〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201600221
林佳宏(2012)。以服務品質觀點探討伺服器虛擬化認知落差〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201200360
黃璿融(2015)。大學生對雲端套裝軟體使用行為意願之研究〔碩士論文,逢甲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6341/fcu.M0211399

延伸閱讀