- 學位論文
行政訴訟和民事訴訟保全程序之比較研究—兼論德國行政法院法之暫時命令
A Study on Provisional Remedies Proceeding of Administrative Litigation and Civil Procedure----Also on Provisional Command of Administrative Litigation in German Law.
若您是本文的作者，可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。
摘要
本論文之研究目的，在於比較行政訴訟法與民事訴訟法之保全程序異同，並且附帶參考德國行政法院法之暫時命令制度。蓋行政訴訟法具有公益性質，與民事訴訟法處理私法爭議有所不同，保全程序於上述兩部法典之中，究竟有何異同而在適用上應予注意，此即為本論文之研究要旨。又比較法上，德國行政法院法之暫時命令與我國保全程序之參照對比，亦為本文所要暸解之處。 撰寫本論文，主要先參考國內對於行政訴訟法與民事訴訟法之教科書，以期先對於保全程序之法律制度有基本概念，而於德國行政法院法之研究上，則主要參考Ferdinand O. Kopp/Wolf–Rüdiger Schenke與Erich Eyermann/Ludwig Fröhler等人所著作之註釋書，另外輔以國內相關碩博士論文及期刊文獻資料。於研究方法上，本論文於瞭解保全程序基本概念後，搜尋相關司法實務判決，藉由學理與實務之分析比對，進一步發現保全程序制度之內涵。另外，我國民事訴訟法發展在先，因此本文均先解構民事訴訟法保全程序，再進一步建構行政訴訟法之保全程序體系（第一章）。 本論文在研究過程中，首先釐清暫時權利保護制度與保全程序之關係，發現保全程序作為暫時權利保護制度之一環，於建構無漏洞之救濟體系上有著重要功能，並附帶比較保全程序與停止執行制度之異同（第二章）。接著，本文介紹德國行政法院法暫時命令之內容與功能，並發現德國暫時命令制度之體系相對單純及容易理解（第三章）。介紹德國制度後，即進入本文之研究重點，即我國之保全程序制度，依序論述我國民事訴訟法及行政訴訟法之假扣押、假處分及定暫時狀態處分。（第四章、第五章及第六章）。 最後，本文發現，我國民事訴訟法與行政訴訟法之最大不同在於，民事訴訟法沒有停止執行制度，而德國行政法院法之保全命令及規制命令分別與我國民事訴訟法及行政訴訟法之假處分及定暫時狀態處分相當類似；另外，本文將上述各章之說明與比較，製作相關比較圖表，作為本文研究結果之簡要呈現（第七章）。
並列摘要
The purpose of this study is to compare the similarities and differences of provisional remedies proceeding in the administrative litigation and civil procedure, also on the provisional command of administrative litigation in german law. In order to research the issues above, the writer have studied and abstracted the textbook of administrative litigation and civil procedure in Taiwan, and build the basic concept of provisional remedies proceeding. About the provisional command of administrative litigation in german law, the writer have read the commentbook wrote by Ferdinand O. Kopp/Wolf–Rüdiger Schenke and Erich Eyermann/Ludwig Fröhler mainly. The writer generalizes the concept of provisional remedies proceeding with the articles of law and textbook, then serch the related judgement in Taiwan. With the analysis of the scholarship and the practice, we can discover the contents of provisional remedies proceeding further. In addition, because the civil procedure of Taiwan developed earlier, it is necessary to deconstruct the elements and consequent of provisional remedies proceeding in civil procedure first, and contruct the the elements and consequent of provisional remedies proceeding in administrative litigation afterwards.(Chapter 1) In the writing, the writer have to clarify the relationship of the provisional remedies proceeding and suspention of enforcement. And we can come to a conclusion that the provisional remedies proceeding is very important in constructing seamless judicial remedies(Chapter 2). In the following, the writer introduces the provisional command of administrative litigation in german law, and digs out that the provisional command in german law is simpler in the concept and the law-system(Chapter 3). After the introducing of provisional command of administrative litigation in german law, the discussion of provional attachment, provisional injunction and injunction maintaining a temporary status quo in Taiwan come up in the thesis (Chapter 4, 5, 6). After the discussion above, the writer finds out that: (1)There is no suspension of enforcement in civil procedure in Taiwan, (2) the conservation command of the provisional command in german law is similar to provisional injunction procedure in Taiwan, (3) the regulation command of the provisional command in german law is similar to injunction maintaining a temporary status quo in Taiwan (Chapter 7). Additionally, the writer makes some charts to show the comparisons of provisional remedies proceeding of administrative litigation and civil procedure and provisional command of administrative litigation in german law as a brief conclusion of this study.
參考文獻
5. 楊建華、王甲乙、鄭健才，民事訴訟法新論，2010年6月。
8. 陳英鈐，從有效權利保護論公法上假處分—與最高行政法院的裁定對話，國立臺灣大學法學論叢，第34卷第4期，頁71–128，2005年7月。
13. 黃國昌，單純不作為與容忍不作為假處分之競合—評最高法院九十二年台抗字第五三二號裁定，民事訴訟理論之新開展，頁503–526，元照出版有限公司，2005年10月初版1刷。
15. 林昱梅，行政法院對暫時權利保護之審查模式—兼評中科三期停止執行與停止開發相關裁定，法令月刊第61卷第10期，頁37–55，2010年10月。
21. 張嘉真、姜威宇，行政處分停止執行之要件—闡述最高行政法院99年度裁字第2041號裁定意旨，萬國法律第195期，頁58–65，2014年6月。