透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.128.168.155
  • 學位論文

未成年子女扶養費請求之研究

A Study of Claims for Child Support

指導教授 : 張文郁
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本論文一共分為七章,先由實體法之理論分析出發,再針對程序法中未成年子女扶養費請求之實務操作問題予以分析。本文亦探討扶養費給付於實務層面如何運作等問題。關於扶養費保全與執行方面,藉由相關議題的討論分析並提出本文之意見與看法。另外,從家事事件法分析說明未成年子女扶養費請求之相關規定,並提出本文之檢討意見與建議。最後提出本論文研究之結論。以下就各章之內容說明之: 第一章為研究動機與目的、研究方法與範圍、問題之提出以及論文之提要。闡述本議題形成的原因與欲達成之研究目的,並提出現今請求未成年子女扶養費所面臨之相關問題,以求對於問題之爭點有一簡單之輪廓;第二章係討論父母子女間之相關概念,以區辨其與扶養概念之不同。針對成年子女扶養請求權,未成年子女對於父母扶養請求之依據源於何處,實有詳加論述之必要。另外,未成年子女扶養費之請求方式亦是本章論述重心。 民事事件分為訴訟事件與非訟事件,本文於第三章中討論本議題之適用程序與審理原則。同時深究民事訴訟法第五七二條之一與非訟事件法第一二七條之解釋與適用。此外,亦介紹德國扶養費簡易程序之規定。在第四章中,本文研究本議題於現今實務運作上之問題,並介紹德國民法之相關規定以作為我國之參考;第五章則就未成年子女扶養費請求保全與執行方面加以討論,其中,民事訴訟法第五七九條與非訟事件法第一二四條保全處分之規定究有何不同,實有釐清之必要。在判決效力之既判力與執行力方面,分別就非訟事件法之明文與民事訴訟法附帶請求之規定分析討論之。 家事事件法已於民國一百年十二月制定通過,此一里程碑有其實體法上與訴訟法上之重大價值,其內容為何,為本文第六章之論述重心,本文於此亦檢討相關條文並提出建議以供參考。結論則綜合分析本議題以檢討現行缺失並提供本文想法,期許本論文對於未成年子女扶養費請求此一議題有所貢獻。 關鍵字:未成年子女、扶養費、適用程序、審理原則、附帶請求、家事事件法

並列摘要


This paper contains seven chapters, starting from the analysis of the theories of substantive law. It is followed by the practice of the claim for financial support in favor of underage children in procedure law. The focus of this paper is the exploration of the practice of the claim for financial support in favor of underage children. A number of related issues will be covered and discussed on the preservation and execution of financial support and the writer of this paper will present her own opinions and interpretation. Further, an analysis of the law of family affairs showed the rules and regulations of the claim for financial support are in favor of underage children with recommendation proposed in this paper. Finally, this paper presents a conclusion of this study. The contents of the chapters are elaborated below. Chapter I deals with the motive and objective of study, research methods, and the proposition of the scope and the issues concerned, and the overview of this paper. In this chapter, the reason for research and the objective intended to be accomplished will be presented. Issues confronting the claim for financial support in favor of underage children will also be addressed for giving an idea on the controversy. In Chapter II, the concept of parents and children will be addressed in order to differentiate this concept from financial support obligation. In this context, it would be necessary to examine the right of the “underage children to claim financial support from the parents” and the sources of such rights. Further, the means of claiming for financial support in favor of underage children will be the gravity of this chapter. Civil cases can be classified into litigation and non-contentious matters. In Chapter III, the procedure and principle of trial will be discussed. At the same time, the interpretation and application of Article 572-1 of the Civil Procedure Act and Article 127 of the Non-Contentious Matters Act will also be addressed. The summary proceeding of child support practiced in Germany will be introduced in this Chapter too. In Chapter IV, the issues confronting the practice of the topic of this paper will be explored with the introduction of related rules and regulations under the Civil Code of Germany as reference for the Republic of China in the practice of its Civil Code. In Chapter V, the preservation and execution of the claim for financial support in favor of underage children will be discussed in detail. The difference between the preservation of child support under Article 579 of the Civil Procedure Act and Article 124 of the Non-Contentious Matters Act will be compelled to be clarified here. The aspect of the power of court ruling and the execution of court ruling will be discussed in terms of the explicit code of Non-Contentious Matters Act and the supplementary claim under Civil Procedure Act separately. The Family Tribunal Law was passed in December 2011. This is a milestone in substantive law and litigation law. Chapter VI will give weight on the discussion of the content of this new law. Related clauses in the law will also be examined in this paper for reference. In the conclusion, the shortcomings detected in this topic will be subject to review as the insight of this paper with a view to contributing to the solution of the issue of the claim for financial support in favor of underage children.

並列關鍵字

underage children support

參考文獻


姜世明,婚姻事件別訴禁止之界限-評最高法院九十七年度台抗字第三三號民事裁定,民事程序法實例研習(二),元照出版公司,2010年。
沈冠伶,家事非訟事件之程序保障-基於紛爭類型審理論及程序法理交錯適用論之觀點,臺大法學論叢,第35卷第4期,2006年7月。
賴淑玲,子女扶養費用計算依據及給付方式之疑義,子女扶養費事件研討會,婦女新知基金會與晚晴協會合辦,頁11,2002年10月。
陸皋揚,單親家庭扶養子女司法救助之研究-以法律社會學觀點,元智大學資訊社會學研究所碩士論文,2008年。
Bumiller/ Winkler, Freiwillige Gerichtsbarkeit, 6. Aufl., 1995.

被引用紀錄


陳柏仁(2013)。民法第1118條之1於老親扶養之司法實證研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.00937
洪霈庭(2013)。扶養義務減免之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-2608201315123100

延伸閱讀