透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.17.74.153
  • 期刊

建構及檢測護理客觀結構式臨床技能測驗考題之信效度、鑑別度及難易度

The Establishment and Examination of the Reliability, Validity, Discrimination, and Difficulty of Nursing Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)

摘要


背景:客觀結構式臨床技能測驗(objective structured clinical examination, OSCE)是目前評估護理學生專業臨床能力的方式之一,其標準化流程之考題發展與考題信效度檢測值得關注。目的:本研究旨在,依標準化流程建構護理OSCE考站;分析OSCE考站專家效度及預測效度、評分者間一致性、內在一致性、考題相關性、鑑別度與難易度。方法:以描述性、橫斷式研究設計,自2015年9月至2016年10月依測驗藍圖發展8站式OSCE考試,應用於北部某科技大學207位四技四年級臨床選習前的護理系學生,並且測試OSCE考題的信效度、鑑別度與難易度。結果:本研究共建構8站OSCE考題, 各題的專家效度指標為.85-1.0,評分者間一致性為.80-1.0,Cronbach's alpha為.53-82,考題相關性為.36-.63,鑑別度多為優良或非常優良,難易度多為容易到適中,且OSCE成績對臨床選習成績具良好的預測效度。結論/實務應用:透過標準化的考題建置流程,發展的8站式護理OSCE考題具良好的信效度、難易度適中及良好的鑑別度,並可做為檢測學生最後一哩專業技能的方法,期許本研究的結果提供護理教育者於發展OSCE評量之參考。

並列摘要


Background: The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is one of the evaluation strategies used to examine the clinical competence of nursing students. More attention needs to be paid to establishing an examination that is based on the standardized protocol and on reliability and validity. Purposes: The aims of this study were to develop an OSCE that is based on a standardized protocol and to analyze the content validity and predictive validity, inter-rater consistency, internal consistency, item-to-total correlation, and the degree of discrimination and difficulty of this OSCE. Methods: Based on the blueprint for OSCEs that use an 8-station format, this study used a descriptive, cross-sectional design and a sample population of 207 senior students who were preparing for their last-mile practicum at a nursing technology university in northern Taiwan. The study period lasted from September 2015 to October 2016. Furthermore, the validity, reliability, degree of discrimination, and difficulty of the OSCE were examined. Results: An OSCE with an eight-station format was developed. The content validity index (CVI) was .85-1.0, inter-rater reliability was .80-1.0, Cronbach' alpha internal consistency was .53-.82, and item-to-total correlation was .36-.63. In addition, the level of difficulty of the OSCE was easy to moderate and the discrimination of the OSCE ranged from fair to excellent. Meanwhile, the OSCE scores of the participants appeared to be a valid predictor of scores on the last mile practicum. Conclusion/Implications for Practice: According to the standardized protocol of OSCE development, an 8- station nursing OSCE format is reliable and valid, providing fair levels of difficulty and discrimination. The developed OSCE may be applied to evaluate the clinical competence of nursing students prior to beginning their last mile practicum. The results from the present study may provide a reference for nursing educators who are responsible for developing OSCE evaluation strategies.

參考文獻


王秀禾、孫嘉玲、陳美慧、洪兆嘉、周培萱、賴玉敏、陳櫂豐(2015)。客觀性結構式臨床測驗(OSCE)應用於護理系課程之成效。技術及職業教育學報。6(2),1-15。
余民寧(2011)。教育測驗與評量:成就測驗與教學評量。台北市=Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC:心理=Psychological。
李選、張婷、顏文娟、王郁琇(2011)。由全球人才競爭思維探討護理師教考用制度之現況、困境與趨勢。國家菁英季刊。6(4),29-45。
李石增編(2012)。客觀結構式臨床測驗—從基礎建立到執行與品質監測。台北市=Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC:台灣愛思唯爾=Elsevier Taiwan。
李國箴(2014)。臨床護理技術能力—OSCE 之應用。台北市=Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC:華杏=Farseeing。

被引用紀錄


林淑君、曾明晰、鍾芬芳(2021)。某科大二年制護理系學生OSCE後設認知策略之詮釋現象學探究源遠護理15(3),45-53。https://doi.org/10.6530/YYN.202111_15(3).0007
李香君、張媚、周汎澔、蔣宜倩、朱宗藍、蕭雅竹(2021)。護理學校客觀結構式臨床測驗資源分析長庚護理32(2),1-13。https://doi.org/10.6386/CGN.202106_32(2).0001
黃湘萍、趙莉芬、范君瑜、樓迎統、簡淑慧(2020)。從實證觀點談OSCE於護理教育之應用長庚護理31(4),476-487。https://doi.org/10.6386/CGN.202012_31(4).0003
劉英妹、陳妙絹、鍾芬芳、黃湘萍、趙莉芬、陳美燕、簡淑慧、范君瑜(2020)。護理實習於新型冠狀病毒肺炎疫情之挑戰護理雜誌67(6),25-31。https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.202012_67(6).05
游鄉柔、黃惠珠、吳佩蓉、黃平芳、陳文鈴、林瑞香(2020)。提升整形外科護理人員計價完整率志為護理-慈濟護理雜誌19(5),97-109。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=16831624-202010-202010270008-202010270008-97-109

延伸閱讀