透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.118.30.253
  • 期刊

書生膽氣,大將才識-論《三國演義》文武關係與治亂隱喻

The Bravery of Scholars and Insight of Generals: Civil-Military Relations and Metaphor for Chaos and Governance in Romance of the Three Kingdoms

摘要


在《三國演義》中,人才鼎盛,經文緯武,如諸葛亮、郭嘉、周瑜、司馬懿等,以文韜而見賞;又關羽、張遼、甘寧、呂布等,因武藝被看重。由於文官有文官身分,武臣有武臣氣概,在書中不同陣營裡,都難免產生頡頏與齟齬之情形,並以性別意識突顯文武辯證的張力。不過,「文」與「武」並非絕對對立:除了文武同心,以求克敵禦侮之外,文官處變不驚,方能充分發揮智謀;武臣臨危不亂,才可有效施展威猛。膽氣與才識是外交及沙場上的兩大羽翼,二者相輔相成,缺一不可,《三國演義》也據此寫出了文武雙全,融會貫通的理想人物。此外,小說中的文武關係也展現了隱喻的色調,在剛柔並陳的比較與批判之餘,更指向了天下治亂的歧異面貌。太平之中,文人得以發揮經濟之才,而在干戈四起的局勢下,則是武士建業之時機,這使得英雄的資格及面對世變時「積極入世」或「獨善其身」之態度,產生了更複雜的拉扯,值得玩味。

關鍵字

《三國演義》 文武 丈夫氣 膽識 治亂

並列摘要


In Romance of the Three Kingdoms, the amount of outstanding talent is seemingly innumerable, including scholars such as Zhuge Liang諸葛亮, Guo Jia郭嘉, Zhou Yu 周瑜, and Sima Yi司馬懿 as well as generals such as Guan Yu關羽, Zhang Liao張遼, Gan Ning甘寧, and Lu Bu呂布, both parties of which have been admired for their proficiency in wen文(civil) wu武(military or martial) affairs, respectively. Owing to the distinction between civil and military officials, contentions within and between the two camps are inevitable, and gender is often used by the novelists to imply the rigidity and weaknesses of as well as the tension between the two groups of officials. However, wen and wu are not in absolute opposition and the two ought to cooperate in an effort to defeat one's enemies. In one regard, scholars need to exhibit courage to remain calm under adversity and in times of conflict; and in another, generals must possess wisdom to perform well in both diplomacy and war. In this way, bravery and insight are complementary and neither are indispensable. Moreover, the civil-military relationship discussed within the novel also illustrates a hint of metaphor; that is, by comparing and criticizing the masculine "hard" 剛and feminine "soft" 柔characteristics of officials, the novelists associate notions, such as wen and wu or bravery and insight, with the effects of peace or war on politics. Therefore, by analyzing these metaphors within Romance of the Three Kingdoms, we can better grasp the dialectical relationship between civil and military officials.

參考文獻


明·羅貫中,《三國演義》,臺北:桂冠圖書公司,1994。
陳曦鐘、宋祥瑞、魯玉川輯校,《三國演義會評本》,北京:北京大學出版社,1998。
于洪江 1993 〈試論《三國演義》對曹操異姓將領的塑造〉,《佳木斯教育學院學報》1993.1(1993.3): 40-44。
王資鑫 1987 〈論《三國演義》的長靠武打藝術〉,《揚州師院學報(社會科學版)》 1987.4(1987.12): 19-27。
王前程 2007 〈《三國演義》與古代將相文化〉,《中華文化論壇》2007.1(2007.3): 71-75。

延伸閱讀