透過您的圖書館登入
IP:216.73.216.100
  • 期刊

田間飽和水力傳度量測方法之比較

Comparison of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Measured by Two Different Field Methods

摘要


本研究利用單筒式滲漏計與Guelph滲透計量測茶園不同處理區之土壤飽和水力傳導度,結果顯示,利用單筒式滲漏筒所測得之飽和水力傳導度較大,且不同處理區間有較大的變異值;而Guelph滲透計所測得之飽和水力傳導度較低,且各處理區間之變異較小。

並列摘要


Field experiments were conducted to compare the saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) measured by two different techniques: Single Ring Infiltrometer (RI) and Guelph Permeameter (GP). The Ks value obtained from the RI method are higher and have greater variability than that obtained by the GP method. Different soil conservation practices would affect the saturated hydraulic conductivity.

被引用紀錄


羅百辰(2013)。利用氣象資料推估土壤蒸發與地下水補注量之研究〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201301080
梁庭維(2005)。紅土現地入滲試驗及參數推估〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu200500519
鄒丞(2015)。結合土壤類型及其蒸發量推估區域性地下水補注之研究〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/CYCU.2015.00144
王建涵(2012)。礫石地土壤水分移動之研究〔碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST.2012.00283

延伸閱讀