透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.119.135.202
  • 期刊

個人-工作適配量表發展:多元構面觀點

The Development of Multidimensional Person-Job Fit Scale (MPJS)

摘要


個人-工作適配(person-job fit)的概念已廣為學者們所重視與探討,但過去研究多以單一構面加以衡量,較少考慮到個人-工作適配應為多元構面的概念。在現有的量表中,以Cable與DeRue(2002)個人工作適配之兩構面量表最常被引用,但其衡量之內涵屬於一般性適配(general fit),在衡量時較難精確瞭解哪些適配項目對於個人的行為或態度影響較大。因此,本研究依循Hinkin(1998)所建議的量表發展過程,以兩組樣本共456位員工為施測對象,經由探索性與驗證性因素分析,發展出「基本需求」、「自尊隸屬」、「自我實現」、「工作要求」與「具備能力」五構面共18題之個人-工作適配量表(Multidimensional Person-Job fit Scale, MPJS)。本量表除了具有良好的收斂效度外,且對工作滿意、情感性組織承諾與專業承諾、離職傾向、求職行為工作績效均有顯著解釋力與遞增效度。MPJS量表的出現。也呼應了學者希望發展更精確的題項以衡量個人-工作適配多元構面的建議。

並列摘要


In recent years, management scholars have extensively examined the concept of person-job fit (P-J fit), due mainly to its potential benefits for employee altitudes and behaviors. For example, P-J fit has been found to be positively related to higher levels of task performance, organizational citizenship behavior, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment, and negatively related to turnover intentions and withdrawal behaviors. As a result, P-J fit has received increasing attention from both academic and practical fields. As for the existing scales for P-J fit, most scholars focused their attention on the ”general fist” between person and job and treated this concept as an unidimensional one. However, some researchers suggested that the multidimensionality and ”specific fit” might be more suitable for this construct (e.g., Kristof-Brown, Zimmerman, & Johnson, 2005). Therefore, we followed the scale development procedure proposed by Hinkin (1998) to develop the Multidimensional Person-Job fit Scale (MPJS) using two independent samples (a total of 456 employees). The results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (n=131 and 325, respectively) showed that the 5-dimension model of MPJS fits the data better than the unidimensional model. In addition, evidences for criterion-related validity were gathered by correlating the scale with job satisfaction, affective organization commitment, affective occupational commitment, turnover intentions, job search behaviors, and job performance. Moreover, the MPJS demonstrated good convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity. The MPJS scale, including l8 specific items in five dimensions, can be used not only to predict employee altitudes and behaviors, but also to identify how to improve employees' fits with their jobs.

參考文獻


邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式:LISREL的理論、技術與應用。台北:雙葉書廊有限公司。
莊璦嘉、林惠彥(2005)。個人與環境適配對工作態度與行為之影響。台灣管理學刊。5(1),123-148。
莊璦嘉、蘇弘文(2005)。主觀適配的特質環境前因與工作態度後果之探討。人力資原管理學報。5(1),1-27。
曾淑雅(2003)。影響人人與組織適配及個人與工作適配長期變化因素之研究(碩士論文)。台灣科技大學企業管理研究所。
謝云嘉(2004)。個人與組織適配及個人與工作配適對工作行為之交互作用影響(碩士論文)。台灣科技大學企業管理研究所。

被引用紀錄


黃櫻美、蔡維奇、林隆偉(2022)。內外兼俱,雙管齊下:探討內部人力資源發展活動與外部顧客經營活動對研發主管職能之影響人力資源管理學報22(1),1-28。https://doi.org/10.6147/JHRM.202206_22(1).0001

延伸閱讀