透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.222.37.169
  • 期刊

聖愚的歸屬:區辨異常的機制及其之於污名的當代反思

Defining the Holy Fool: Differentiation and its Significance in the Question of Stigma

摘要


當真相被愚昧蒙蔽,污名於焉而生。污名的指涉之所以成立,是因其處於相對於正常的類別及歸屬。當污名的特徵超出常人的理解時,它的殊異或被視為天賜之福,或成為社會竭力排除的禁忌。俄羅斯的聖愚被東正教視為具神性的異常個體,他的存在透露出一種類別建構的機制,刻劃出如聖愚之類的異常人在歷史文化中的步履。本文透過梳理聖愚的身份變化、瞭解帝俄晚期安置異常人的決策、觀察異教徒的田野紀錄等,探查聖愚不等同其他「患者」的原因,並以此反思當下區辨異常的機制。污名總是處於相對的、動態的關係。儘管異常的人、事對於穩定的社會秩序可能構成威脅,卻無法否定其之於革新生態系統的助益。無論聖愚的言行是否符合彼時社會對於「正常」的期待,評判的機制與其背後累積的文化底蘊,展現俄羅斯獨有的特色,一種處於二元兩極狀態下的矛盾,及各類族群交融後的共存共生。

關鍵字

聖愚 東正教 污名 異常

並列摘要


Stigma emerges when the truth is blinded by ignorance. The stigma reveals itself with a given meaning only when it is placed in a relative position to an anticipated normal category. The visibility of a certain distinctiveness can be emphasized as a divine gift which is beyond our general understanding or as a taboo which should be avoided for the benefit of social order. The holy fool in Russia bears a stigma which has been defined in various ways and has been explained as the condition when there is a necessity. The aim of this paper is to initiate a conceptual discourse about the question of abnormality in a society requiring the least differentiation through the study of the holy fool amongst the non-Russian natives of diverse habitus within the Russian Empire in the late nineteenth century. The objective is to take the holy fool as a figure to examine the rules for distinction and to question the issue of different others in an atmosphere where every individual (bearing more or less a stigma) should have his/her right of survival. Stigma happens in fluid and relative situations. Abnormality may be a threat to the stability of system, but can be an alternative to new invention.

並列關鍵字

Holy Fool Orthodox Church Stigma Abnormality

參考文獻


朱元鴻(2006)。〈他說的,可不就是你!評高夫曼《污名》〉,《臺灣社會學刊》,37 : 243-250。
北京商務印書館(2010)。《古史紀年》(古俄語─漢語對照),王松亭譯注,北京:商務。
張雅平(2013)。《東正教與俄羅斯社會》。北京:社會科學文獻。
黑龍江人民出版社(1998)。《俄漢詳解大詞典》卷4。哈爾濱:黑龍江人民。
雷永生(2007)。《東西文化碰撞中的人:東正教與俄羅斯人道主義》。北京:華夏。

延伸閱讀