透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.222.109.141
  • 期刊

荷蘭人據澎湖始末(1622-1624)

The Netherlander in the Pescadores( 1622-l624)

若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


1622-1624荷蘭人曾經佔有澎湖兩年,以往學者討論荷蘭人據澎湖問題,不是過於簡單,讓人無法了解事情的經過,就是過於政治化,以理論取代史學,而讓整個問題的焦點糊不清。本文主要是透過荷蘭文資料,特別是雙方來往信件的整理。比較重視歷史事件的敘述,而不是歷史理論的建立。將主要的焦點放在:一、荷蘭人佔有澎湖的目的;二、佔據澎湖期間雙方的交涉與貿易;三、荷蘭人為甚麼會放棄澎湖而到台灣。 本文指出,追求與明王朝貿易是他們佔領澎湖的主要因素,然而澎湖是屬於明帝國的領土,不許外國人定居,並用武力壓抑之。荷蘭人一方面必須面對明帝國的武力,另一方面又無法獲得貿易,迫使荷蘭人必須由澎湖撤退到台灣,不過他們想用武力達到貿易的目的,卻沒有因此放棄。

並列摘要


The 1622-1624 Dutch occupation of Pescadores has been debated, but the discussions are either too simple or suffer form an excess of abstraction and ideological interpretation. This Essay is base on Dutch materials, especially the mutual communicated between the Dutchmen and the Ming Empire, and focuses on narration of historical events. It analyzes three topics. First, the Dutch objectives in occupying Pescadores; Second, the mutual negotiations and trade during the period of occupation; Third, the reasons for the Dutch abandonment of Pescadores for Taiwan. This essay points out that trade with Ming Empire was one of the Dutchmen’s main reasons for occupying Pescadores. However, since Pescadores was Ming territory, the Ming Empire used military force to contain the traders. Because the Dutch were not only faced with this threat, but were also move to Taiwan. However, they did not renounce their policy of setting up trade by means violence.

被引用紀錄


陳燕翎(2008)。清代澎湖海防經營(1684~1895)〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2008.00612
謝宗佑(2018)。民變、豪強與官府:十九世紀臺灣林萬掌家族的發展〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201800115
林琮舜(2014)。臺灣史研究在高中教科書中的落實與落差〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.01739
江瑞昌(2005)。臺灣客家族群民間信仰之研究--以新竹縣新埔鎮枋寮義民廟為中心〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2005.02799
楊毓雯(2007)。「平埔客」之歷史探究:以道卡斯竹塹社廖姓為對象〔碩士論文,國立中央大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0031-0207200917350026

延伸閱讀