透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.147.42.168

並列摘要


Various conservative treatment options for repetitive strain injury are widely used, despite questionable evidence of their effectiveness. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of these treatment options for relieving symptoms of repetitive strain injury and improving activities of daily living. Searches in Medline and Embase, with additional reference checking resulted in 15 eligible trials for this review. Methodological quality was assessed, and data-extraction was performed. With the use of a ”best-evidence synthesis”, no strong evidence was found for the effectiveness of any of the treatment options. There is limited evidence that multidisciplinary rehabilitation, ergonomic intervention measures, exercises, and spinal manipulation combined with soft tissue therapy are effective in providing symptom relief or improving activities of daily living. There is conflicting evidence for the effectiveness of behavioral therapy. In conclusion, little is known about the effectiveness of conservative treatment options for repetitive strain injury. To establish strong evidence, more high-quality trials are needed.

延伸閱讀


  • 戴有志、黃慧君(2006)。Repetitive Strain Injury中醫骨傷科醫學雜誌(5),10-12。https://doi.org/10.30098/JCOT.200612.0004
  • Lo, K. Y. (2004). Childhood injury prevention [master's thesis, The University of Hong Kong]. Airiti Library. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0029-1812201200001034
  • 思凱(2002)。Cognitive Therapy諮商與輔導(195),12-12。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000014-200203-x-195-12-12-o
  • 陳建良(2007)。Injuries and Injury Prevention中華民國航空醫學暨科學期刊21(2),105-111。https://doi.org/10.7011/JAMSRC.200712.0105
  • Chen, H. C., Lee, W. J., & Lin, H. J. (2010). Acute Involuntary Movement of Upper Limb. 中華民國急救加護醫學會雜誌, 21(1), 54-55. https://doi.org/10.30018/JECCM.201003.0009