我國農業環境基本給付政策之效益評估

Evaluation of Agri-Environmental Basic Payment Policy

林信維(Hsing-Wei Lin) ； 謝敬華(Ching-Hua Hsieh) ； 柳婉郁(Wan-Yu Liu)

《應用經濟論叢》 110期 (2021/12) Pp. 163-219

https://doi.org/10.3966/054696002021120110005

摘要

本研究主要目的為分析農業環境基本給付措施，在休耕地復耕部分之政策效益，並討論與分析當前的實施辦法是否能有效達成農地農用與促進農業多功能效益發揮之政策目標。研究結果指出，整體而言，我國農業環境基本給付政策於109年第一期作整體農業環境基本給付的給付規模約為9.4億元，休耕地復耕面積為2,466公頃；而就休耕地復耕的部分，其創造的直接效益約為7.3億元至7.7億元，若加上農業產值帶動其他產業之間接效益，則整體效益約為10.3億元至10.6億元。然而，由於民眾普遍認為休耕農地的生態價值較以慣行農法操作農地的生態價值來得高；因此，除非休耕地復耕使用永續農法，否則休耕地復耕產生的生態效益有限，甚至是淨損。本研究認為農業環境基本給付或許有益於農地農用政策目標的達成，但在生態效益部分的助益有限。因此，政府應對目前的農業環境基本給付於整體農業直接給付政策中所扮演的角色進行釐清；而若政府欲透過相關的農業直接給付措施發揮生態效益，則應進一步的對於相關配套措施與實施辦法進行改革。

關鍵字

直接給付 ； 農業環境基本給付 ； 政策評估

並列摘要

The main purpose of this research is to analyze the policy benefits of the agri-environment basic payment and discuss whether can achieve the policy objectives that farmland used for farming and promoting agricultural multifunctional benefits. The results of the study indicate that, on the whole, in the first crop of 2020, the agri-environment basic payment cost about NTD 940 million, the fallow land restored about 2,466 ha. Regarding the restoration of fallow land, the direct benefits are about NTD 730 million to NTD 770 million, and the overall benefit (direct benefit plus indirect benefit) is about NTD 1.03 billion to NTD 1.06 billion. Since the people generally believe that the ecological value of fallow farmland is higher than that of farmland operated by conventional farming methods. Therefore, unless fallow farmland is restored using sustainable methods, the ecological benefits of fallow farmland restoration are limited or even net losses. The agri-environment basic payment may be helpful for that farmland used for farming, but it may not be beneficial to the ecological benefit. Therefore, the government should clarify the role of the agri-environment basic payment in the direct payment policy. If the government wants to promote ecological benefits through the agri-environment basic payment, it should further reform related supporting measures and implementation methods.

並列關鍵字

Direct Payment ； Agri-Environmental Basic Payment ； Policy Evaluation

參考文獻

行政院主計總處，2020，產業關聯表，取自 https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/lp.asp?CtNode=2340&CtUnit=1088&BaseDSD=7&mp=1，檢索日期：2020/08/20。(Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, 2020, Industrial Linkage Table, Retrieved August 20, 2020, from https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/lp.asp?CtNode=2340&CtUnit=1088&BaseDSD=7&mp=1.)

行政院農業委員會，2020，農業統計年報，取自 https://agrstat.coa.gov.tw/sdweb/public/book/ Book.aspx，檢索日期：2020/08/20。(Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, 2020, Agricultural Statistics Yearbook, Retrieved August 20, 2020, from https://agrstat.coa.gov.tw/sdweb/public/book/Book.aspx.)

行政院農業委員會農糧署，2019，109 年「對地綠色環境給付計畫」內容重點，取自https://www.afa.gov.tw/cht/index.php?code=list&flag=detail&ids=1016&article_id=46042檢索日期：2020/08/20。(Agriculture and Food Agency, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, 2019, 2020 “Green Environmental Payment Plan” The Focus of the Content, Retrieved August 20, 2020, from https://www.aa.gov.tw/cht/index.php?code=list&flag=detail&ids=1016&article_id=46042.)

行政院農業委員會農糧署，2020，109 年度農業環境基本給付申報資料，台北：行政院農業委員會農糧署。(Agriculture and Food Agency, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, 2020, 2020 Agricultural Environment Basic Payment Application Materials, Tapeip: Agriculture and Food Agency, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan.)

林正生與陳志成，2010，「農業生活文化與生態環境功能之經濟價值評估」，農林學報，59：339-358。(Lin, Z. H. and C. C. Chen, 2010, “The Economic Value of Living and Ecology Function on the Farmland”, Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 59: 339-358.)