白肉雞產業不同飼養契約型態的分析

An Analysis on the Different Raising Contracts in the Broiler Industry

黃炳文(Biing-Wen Huang) ； 馮誠萬(C.W. Feng) ； 邵敬之(Ching-Chih Shao)

《台灣農學會報》 10卷3期 (2009/06) Pp. 167-181

https://doi.org/10.6730/JAAT.200906_10(3).0001

摘要

台灣白肉雞產業的飼養契約型態主要有：時價、保價及待養。此三種型態的契約規範及計價方式各有不同，然雞農的收入主要受市場條件及個人經營條件所影響。按理而言，時價契約的收入較高，但風險亦較大；保價契約的收入及風險相對居中；而代養契約的收入相對較低，但風險亦較低。雞農根據個人偏好及預期利潤，可動態調整不同契約的型態，使得三種契約之發展的「微妙三角關係」得以存續。在各契約生產的發展中，亦潛藏雞農、飼料廠及電宰廠的互動三角關係。

關鍵字

時價契約 ； 保價契約 ； 代養契約

並列摘要

There are three major raising contracts in the broiler industry: the market price contract, the guarantee price contract, and an agent contract. Even though those contracts have different regulations and pricing methods, the revenues of growers are still basically determined by the market conditions and individual management conditions. Generally speaking, the market price contract accompanies higher profit with higher risk. The profit and risk in the guarantee price contract are relatively in the median level. There is usually lower profit and risk in the agent contract. Growers could dynamically adjust their contract based on their preference and expected profits. Therefore, the ＜||＞delicate triangle relationship＜||＞ among those contract types could be substantial. Moreover, in the development of contract production, the ＜||＞interactive triangle relationship＜||＞ is hidden among the growers, feedstuff plants, and processing plants.

並列關鍵字

Market price contract ； Guarantee price contract ； Agent contract.