- 期刊
- OpenAccess
Can Money Buy Votes? -A Case Study of U.S. Sugar Policy
政治獻金能否買到票？－美國糖業政策之個案研究
並列摘要
The purpose of this article is to propose a model to explain the simultaneity of campaign contributions and voting. Three U.S. House of Representative votes on sugar amendments are studied. The empirical results suggest that we cannot reject the hypothesis of the simultaneity between campaign contributions from the sweetener producer and user political action committees and House voting on the sugar amendments. The hypothesis that the House Agriculture Committee members receive more money from the sweetener producer and user groups is rejected while the results find that junior members receive more contributions from both groups. This suggests a long-term investment behavior of the two interest groups. The results also show evidence of vote-trading among sugar, tobacco, and peanut farmers. The simulation suggests that the sugar program would remain in place if campaign contributions were not allowed.
參考文獻
延伸閱讀
- 蔡政麟（2006）。納入糖尿病共同照護網後影響病患遵醫囑行為、治療成效與醫療資源耗用之研究-以某區域教學醫院為例〔碩士論文，亞洲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0118-0807200916274291
- 許祐堡（2007）。參與全民健康保險糖尿病醫療給付改善方案之病患其醫療資源利用情形之探討—以某區域醫院為例〔碩士論文，元智大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0009-0607200721031000
- 陳玟潔、陳淑娟、滕玉鳳、周振凱、陳榮福、翁紹紋（2021）。問糖品為何物？直教團隊優質相許－高雄長庚參與「糖尿病照護品質認證」經驗分享。醫療品質雜誌，15(3)，62-64。https://doi.org/10.3966/199457952021051503009
- 李怡慧（2015）。由服務量轉變為醫療價值的實現-基層醫療糖尿病專科診所事業策略分析〔碩士論文，國立宜蘭大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0046-2108201516411200
- 吳登成（2012）。國營事業資產登錄為文化景觀之法律問題-以糖業廠區登錄為文化景觀為例〔碩士論文，國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613493956