透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.138.36.87
  • 期刊

諮商心理師倫理判斷與倫理行為之調查研究

A Survey Study on Ethical Judgments and Behavior of Certified Counseling Psychologists

摘要


本研究之目在探討諮商心理師之倫理判斷、判斷信心程度與倫理行為之現況。以自編之「諮商心理師倫理判斷與倫理行為問卷」,經立意取樣邀得103位諮商心理師完成調查問卷。研究發現:一、諮商心理師普遍認為合乎倫理者有6項,分屬不同層面;諮商心理師普遍認為不合乎倫理者,分屬於「非性雙重關係」、「性雙重重關係」、「知後同意」、「諮商心理師專業與倫理責任」等層面;倫理判斷信心指數高兩,包恬「性雙重關係」、「保密及保管的限制」、「知後同意」、「非性雙重關係」及其他層面。上述倫理議題乃是諮商心理師最有共識與較為熟悉者。二、倫理判斷意見相左且判斷信心程度低者,多屬「收費議題」,此可能為國內專業倫理教育與研究侷限之處。三、在倫理行為方面,諮商心理師最少出現的行為有30項,顯示諮商心理師在相關倫理行為甚為嚴謹;諮商心理師最常出現的行為包括「保密及保密的限制」、「非性雙重關係」、「技術使用之適切性」及其他等層面,相關議題值得注意。四、諮商心理師倫理判斷與倫理行為大部分相符,但其中仍有8項倫理行為與倫理判斷不一致,值得倫理教育與研究做後續探討。

並列摘要


The study aimed to explore ethical judgments, degree of confidence in judgments, and ethical behaviors of counseling psychologists. The survey was conducted by way of purposeful sampling and 103 counseling psychologists were invited to compete the self-designed ”Ethical Judgment and Behavior Questionnaire for Certified Counseling Psychologists”. The findings of the survey are as follows: (1) Among those different aspects covered, there are six items conceived by the psychologists as generally ethical, while items conceived as unethical appertain to ”non-sexual dual relationship”, ”sexual dual relationship”, ”informed consent”, ”professionalism and ethical responsibility of the counseling psychologist”. Items with high confidence in ethical judgments include ”sexual dual relationship”, ”confidentiality and confidentiality limits”, ”informed consent”, ”non-sexual dual relationship”, and so on. The above-mentioned issues were where the counseling psychologists gained the most consensus and familiarity; (2) Items with discrepancies in the opinions of ethical judgments and low confidence in judgments mainly fell on the ”charging issue”, which may be a limitation of professional ethical education and research of Taiwan; (3) In terms of ethical behaviors, 30 items appeared least in counseling psychologist, suggesting their prudence in ethical related behavior. The most frequent behaviors appeared among the counseling psychologists include ”confidentiality and confidentiality limits” , ”non-sexual dual relationship”, ”technique appropriateness”, and so on, with notable relevant issues; and (4) Most ethical judgments and behaviors met with each other, while eight discrepancies emerged to be worth further discussion in the area of ethical education and research.

參考文獻


牛格正、王智弘(2008)。助人專業倫理。台北:心靈工坊。
王智弘(1999)。心理諮商之證照制度與專業倫理。測驗與輔導。154,3211-3214。
心理師法(2001):取自全國法規資料庫網站:http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=L0020098,2010 年10 月31 日。
台灣輔導與諮商學會(2001):台灣輔導與諮商學會諮商專業倫理守則。取自台灣輔導與諮商學會網站:http://www.guidance.org.tw/ethic_001.html,2010 年2 月17 日。
陳文玲(1991)。學校輔導教師諮商倫理信念之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所。

被引用紀錄


蔡宜樺(2021)。復健諮商與專業倫理教育實踐之探究諮商心理與復健諮商學報(35),65-74。https://doi.org/10.6308/JCPRC.202102_(35).0004
洪莉竹(2018)。台灣諮商輔導倫理研究之回顧與展望中華輔導與諮商學報(53),151-189。https://doi.org/10.3966/172851862018100053006
田廣曉、王智弘、楊淳斐、陳增堂、劉純姣、徐凱文、安芹、張勻銘(2020)。中國大陸諮商師非性雙重關係倫理態度與倫理行為之調查研究輔導與諮商學報42(2),31-62。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=18181546-202011-202012090012-202012090012-31-62
周佑芯、蔡忠霖、林婕妤、顏莉穎、陳玉容、吳芝儀(2021)。斜槓心理師專業認同與生涯承諾之探討諮商與輔導(423),15-18+6。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=16846478-202103-202104070017-202104070017-15-18+6

延伸閱讀