透過您的圖書館登入
IP:216.73.216.134
  • 期刊

成人生涯召喚量表之編製及其信效度分析

Development and Validation of a Career Calling Scale for Working Adults in Taiwan

摘要


本研究旨在編製成人生涯召喚量表並進行信效度分析。量表發展分三階段,第一階段,以30 位20 歲以上之成人工作者為對象,透過焦點團體訪談蒐集生涯召喚相關經驗,以質性紮根方法進行分析,所得結果作為編製量表題目之基礎。第二階段,先進行專家效度檢核,接著進行預試分析,確立正式題目。所建構之量表包含興趣熱情、存在意義、助人利他與超越召喚等四部份,共計20題,以4 點量表方式填答,分數愈高表示該部分之生涯召喚程度愈明顯。第三階段,以548 位成人工作者為對象,年齡介於16 至58 歲(M = 35.59,SD = 11.48),進行正式量表之信效度驗證。四個分量表之內部一致性介於 .87 至 .92,總量表為 .97。社會服務與管理政治領域之工作者在各分量表的傾向顯著高於事務領域,各分量表與工作滿意度、自我效能具有正相關、與工作壓力呈現負相關,以及透過驗證性因素分析結果,顯示本量表具有不錯的建構效度及效標關聯效度。最後根據結果進行討論,並提出未來研究及實務應用的建議。

並列摘要


This study developed a career calling scale for working adults in Taiwan. In the first stage, the participants were 30 working adults over the age of 20. Focus group interviews were conducted to collect the data, that the author used to establish the scale as a pilot scale. In the second stage, three experts were invited to assess content validity. Then, a pre-test of the pilot scale was conducted to obtain 151 questionnaires, and the data was analyzed and selected under item analysis and factor analysis methods to establish a formal scale. The Career Calling Scale (CCS) contains 20 items rated on a 4-point scale and consists of four subscales: Interests and Passions, Life Meaning, Altruism, and Transcendent Summons. Higher scores people in each subscale show strong inclination toward that aspect. In the third stage, the participants were 548 working adults between the ages of 16 and 58 (M = 35.59, SD = 11.48). Reliability analysis indicated that the internal consistency of the four subscales was between .87 and .92, and the internal consistency of the whole scale was .97. The comparison of background variables showed that the scores for each subscale for social workers and enterprising workers were significantly higher than the scores for realistic workers. Using Job Satisfaction, Self-Efficacy, and Work Stress as criteria, the test showed high criterion-related validity. Confirmatory factor analysis also showed a good model fit, which supported good construct validity. At the end, a discussion based on the results and suggestions for practice and future studies are provided.

參考文獻


田秀蘭(2000)。紮根理論在諮商心理學研究中的應用。輔導季刊。36(4),35-40。
田秀蘭()。,未出版。
田秀蘭、郭乃文(2002)。成人生涯認知量表之發展及其效度研究。測驗年刊。49(1),19-38。
朱明謙(2001)。高科技產業從業人員休閒行為、工作壓力與工作績效之研究。義守大學管理科學研究所=I-Shou University。
吳佳煇、林以正(2005)。中庸思維量表的編製。本土心理學研究。24,247-300。

被引用紀錄


吳盈瑩(2023)。國小主任之生涯召喚的感知及實踐經驗學校行政(146),160-188。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.202307_(146).0006
楊順翔、陳坤虎(2023)。邁向成人期生涯決策自我效能、積極因應與生涯召喚之關係-認同探索型態調節效果之探討教育心理學報54(4),863-889。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202306_54(4).0005
龔蕾、田秀蘭、金樹人(2023)。疫情期間成人生涯召喚、生涯混沌知覺、未來工作自我與生涯調適力之關聯性教育心理學報54(4),759-784。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202306_54(4).0001
劉曉芬、陳清梅(2020)。矢志為師-師資生靈性取向生涯召喚之探究師資培育與教師專業發展期刊13(1),1-26。https://doi.org/10.3966/207136492020041301001
王玉珍(2018)。優勢中心生涯諮商與生涯召喚之諮商效果與影響經驗探究中華輔導與諮商學報(52),19-50。https://doi.org/10.3966/172851862018080052002

延伸閱讀