語意分割技術於景觀評估之運用

Application of Semantic Segmentation Technology to Landscape Assessment

何立智(Li-Chih Ho) ； 何柏翰(Po-Han Ho)

《戶外遊憩研究》 35卷2期 (2022/06) Pp. 1-32

https://doi.org/10.6130/JORS.202206_35(2).0001

摘要

心理物理模式（psychophysical paradigm）是景觀評估中的一種方法，該方法著重於了解實質環境的物理特徵對於心理感受的影響。在進行評估時，物理特徵常使用人工的方式描繪影像而取得，然近年來人工智慧技術的發展中，語意分割（semantic segmentation）可由電腦自動化擷取上述之影像特徵，但由於目前語意分割的模型相當多樣，何種模型適用於景觀領域、有何限制，需要進一步的討論與比較。因此，本研究取用目前在語意分割技術中不同的模型25個，比較模型於景觀偏好、自然度與開放度等三項景觀評估指標之表現，結果顯示ADE20K之語意分割模型是目前較適合景觀領域所使用之模型，而Cityscapes模型對於街道景觀的分析效果不錯，然該模型無法分析水體、山岳等非都市地區的景觀元素，其使用較受限制。

關鍵字

人工智慧 ； 深度學習 ； 景觀偏好 ； 自然度 ； 開放度

並列摘要

The psychophysical paradigm is a method in landscape assessment that focuses on understanding the impact of physical features on psychological perceptions. In the assessment, physical features are often obtained by manually depicting images. With the development of artificial intelligence technology, semantic segmentation can automatically capture physical features, but the current semantic segmentation models are pretty diverse. What models are suitable for the landscape domain, and what are the limitations? Further discussions and comparisons are needed. Therefore, in this study, 25 different models of the semantic segmentation technique were used to compare the performance of three landscape evaluation indicators: landscape preference, naturalness, and openness. The results showed that the ADE20K semantic segmentation model is more suitable for the landscape domain than other models. By contrast, the Cityscapes model is ideal for streetscape analysis. However, it cannot analyze landscape elements in non-urban areas, such as water bodies and mountains, so its use is more limited than that of the ADE20K model.

並列關鍵字

Artificial intelligent ； Deep learning ； Landscape preference ； Naturalness ； Openness

參考文獻

何立智、陳建中、張俊彥(2020)。運用影像頻率域特徵建構景觀偏好預測模型之研究。戶外遊憩研究，33(3)，1-26。Ho, L. C., Chen, C. C., & Chang, C. Y. (2020). Using image features from the frequency domain to construct a prediction model of landscape preference. Journal of Outdoor Recreation Study, 33(3), 1-26.

翁珮怡、江彥政、張俊彥(2011)。土地開發程度對自然度感受及生心理反應之影響。造園景觀學報，17(1)，41-60。Weng, P. Y., Chiang, Y. C., & Chang, C. Y. (2011). Influences of land development level on respondents’ naturalness and psychophysical responses. Journal of Landscape, 17(1), 41-60.

Appleton, J. (1975). The experience of landscape. New York: Wiley.

Berman, M. G., Hout, M. C., Kardan, O., Hunter, M. R., Yourganov, G., Henderson, J. M., . . . Jonides, J. (2014). The perception of naturalness correlates with low-level visual features of environmental scenes. PloS One, 9(12), e114572.

Bourassa, S. C. (1990). A paradigm for landscape aesthetics. Environment and Behavior,22(6), 787-812.