學者是開放取用的主要利害相關者,本研究以問卷探索我國學者對開放取用期刊的認知與實踐。問卷於2021年11月1日至2022年6月9日發放,邀請對象含16所研究導向機構的學者,計有1,177份有效問卷,問卷內容涵蓋學者基本資料、學者發表至開放取用期刊之實踐行為、學者對於開放取用(期刊)的認知、學者認為圖書館在開放取用上應扮演的角色,以及學者對於制定開放取用規範或政策的看法。根據研究分析結果,本研究提出建議如下:一、建議學者可根據研究結果調整對開放取用期刊的認知與實踐;二、建議圖書館可根據研究結果增強與擴展對開放取用的相關服務;三、建議研究計畫資助機構和服務機構訂定適當的開放取用規範或政策。
This study attempts to understand Taiwanese scholars' perceptions and practices of open access journals (OAJ). A total of 1,177 valid questionnaires were collected from 15 research universities and Academia Sinica. The questionnaires cover the demographics information on scholars, their practices of publishing in OAJs, their perceptions of OA and OAJs, their opinions on the library services for OA, and their opinions on the establishment of OA policies or mandates. Three suggestions are given: 1. Scholars should adjust their perceptions and practices of OAJs according to the result findings; 2. academic libraries can broaden and enhance their services for OA; 3. research funding agencies and research institutes are encouraged to establish OA policies or mandates.