美國2022公共取用政策對學術出版的影響初探

2019年COVID-19造成全球公衛危機，開放取用的研究成果力助疾病的發展預測及疫苗的開發，使得大眾對於研究產出的開放共享需求提高。2022年美國白宮科技政策辦公室（OSTP）發布「確保自由、立即且平等取用聯邦資助研究產出備忘錄」，相較2013年OSTP發布的公共取用政策僅規範年度研發經費超過1億美元的聯邦機構，2022年政策的適用範圍擴及所有規模的聯邦機構，期望所有由聯邦政府資助的研究產出能更公平、快速地被取用，並支持以實證為基礎的政府決策。本文藉由文獻探討了解美國公共取用發展，觀察2013及2022年政策的差異以及新政策可能為學術出版界帶來的變化影響，最後提出圖書館的因應建議，提供學術圖書館在未來發展館內服務時的另一思考面向。

關鍵字

公共取用；開放取用；學術出版；轉型化合約；文章處理費

並列摘要

The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) issued the public access policy guideline "Increasing Access to the Results of Federally Funded Scientific Research "to require federal agencies with R&D budgets over $100 million for making research papers publicly available. In 2019, the outbreak of the infectious pandemic COVID-19, which caused the global health crisis highlighted the importance of open access. The research outputs which can be accessed immediately, freely, and publicly made great contributions to epidemic tracking and forecasting and accelerated the developments in drugs and vaccines. In 2022, OSTP issued a memorandum on" Ensuring Free, Immediate, and Equitable Access to Federally Funded Research", expanding the scope of the 2013 Memorandum. The updated OSTP policy guidance expects the research outputs funded by all federal agencies can be accessed more equitably and quickly and support the government in making evidence-based decisions. In this paper, by reviewing the literature on the developments of the U.S. public access policy guidance, to recognize the difference between the two memorandums and it is hoped that libraries can have a better understanding of the global impact on scholarly publishing in the developments of the U.S. policy. Based on the literature findings and observations, this paper provides libraries with suggestions on how to respond to the global changes which are hard to ignore.

並列關鍵字

Public access ； Open Access ； Scholarly publishing ； Transformative agreement ； APC

參考文獻

邱子恆、蕭淑媛（2020）。臺北醫學大學圖書館學術傳播服務之推動與成果。圖資與檔案學刊，12(2)，174-209。【Chiu, Tzu-Heng, & Siao, Shu-Yuan (2020). Implementation and outcomes of scholarly communication services in Taipei Medical University Library. Journal of InfoLib and Archives, 12(2), 174-209. (in Chinese)】doi:10.6575/JILA.202012_(97).0005

柯皓仁（2022）。臺灣學者開放取用期刊認知與實踐之研究。教育資料與圖書館學，59(3)，239-276。【Ke, Hao-Ren (2022). A study on Taiwanese scholars’ perceptions and practices of open access journals. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 59(3), 239-276. (in Chinese)】doi:10.6120/JoEMLS.202211_59(3).0022.RS.AM

黃元鶴（2021）。綜論美國學術圖書館之學術傳播、研究資料管理與數位學術研究服務：麻州與密蘇里州五所大學圖書館實證研究。教育資料與圖書館學，58(3)，339-376。【Huang, Yuan-Ho (2021). An overview of scholarly communication, research data management and digital scholarship services in American academic libraries: An empirical study from five university libraries in the states of Massachusetts and Missouri. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 58(3), 339-376. (in Chinese)】doi:10.6120/JoEMLS.202111_58(3).0016.OR.AM

李家寧（2020）。OA 與我們的距離：OA 浪潮下非營利及學會期刊出版的轉型之道。科技政策觀點。【Li, Chia-Ning (2020). OA yu wo men de ju li: OA lang chao xia fei ying li ji xue hui qi kan chu ban de zhuan xing zhi dao. Research Portal. (in Chinese)】doi:10.6916/STPIRP.2020-4-13

林孟玲、李家寧、顏惠專、潘姝琪、陳紹麗、曹婷婷、江奐儀（2021）。臺灣學術圖書館 Open Access 現狀與意向初探。臺北市：財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心。【Lin, Meng-Ling, Li, Chia-Ning, Yen, Hui-Chuan, Pan, Shu-Qi, Chen, Shao-Li, Cao, Ting-Ting, & Jiang, Huan-Yi (2021). Discovery to the open access status and intention of Taiwan academic libraries. Taipei: Science & Technology Policy Research and Information Center, National Applied Research Laboratories. (in Chinese)】doi:10.978.957619/3071

主題瀏覽