試論劉向災異學說之轉變

A Study on the Changing Development of Liu Xiang's Theory of Anomalies

黃啟書(Chi-Shu Huang)

《臺大中文學報》 26期 (2007/06) Pp. 119-151

https://doi.org/10.6281/NTUCL.2007.26.05

摘要

兩漢主要災異學說之中，以洪範五行傳學說影響後世最爲深遠。尤其劉向、劉故父子各自撰著的《洪範五行專論》，經班固匯整取捨後，成爲歷代正史災異紀錄的體例。甚至影響了後代學者對於災異分類的認知。學界對於向、歆父子的研究，主要集中在政治立場及文獻車里的貢獻上，鮮及二人災異學說體系異同的精細分析。本文主要探討劉向災異學說前後期之演變。
就《漢書》所見材料分析，可以看出在《洪範五行傳論》撰作之前，劉向主要沿襲董仲舒春秋公羊災異學說的主要看法與原則；撰成以後，其內容的確影響到其後奏疏封事之運用材料與詮釋法則。因此，《洪範五行傳論》之撰作可稱爲是劉向災異學說轉變之分水嶺。

關鍵字

洪範五行傳 ； 災異 ； 劉向 ； 董仲舒 ； 五行

並列摘要

Among the Han theories of anomalies (zai yi), the one constructed in the 1-lorigian waxing zhuan proves to have the most enduring influence in later times. Thanks to the admirable compiling effort of Ban Gu, the Hongian waxing zhuan Iun, written by Liu Xiang and his son Liu Xin, even become the paradigm for later days' writing of the records of anomalies. Previous studies on Liu Xiang and Liu Xin, however, have focused on either their political views or their contributions to collecting and assorting literature. Little attention is paid to their theories of anomalies, not to mention their differences in this regard.
This article looks at the changing development of Liu Xiang's theory of anomalies. It argues that the development went through two distinct phases, and that appearance of the Hongfan waxing zhaanlun marked the transition as well as a significant change in Liu's theory.

並列關鍵字

Hongfan waxing zhuan ； anomalics zaiyi ； Liu Xiang ； Liu Xin ； Dong Zhongshu ； waxing fivc clcmcnts

參考文獻

舊題左丘明著、韋昭注(1983)。國語。臺北:漢京文化公司。

司馬遷(1974)。史記。臺北:洪氏出版社。

班固(1991)。漢書。臺北:鼎文書局。

酈道元(1979)。四部叢刊正編：水經注。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。

孔穎達(1978)。十三經注疏：禮記正義。臺北:新文豐出版公司。