論鮑照詩的評價及風格判斷問題－「休鮑」論、「險俗」說衍議

Reexamining the Criticism of Bao Zhao's Poems: The Ideas Behind "Xian Su," "Xiu Bao" and the Critical Stances They Engender

李錫鎮(Shi-Chen Lee)

《臺大中文學報》 31期 (2009/12) Pp. 103-146

https://doi.org/10.6281/NTUCL.2009.31.03

摘要

對鮑照詩的負面批評，在現代學者論述中頗多著墨，不但低眨其作品，甚而非議其人格。若考察其論點，大多與「險俗」說、「休鮑」論有關，前者本於鍾嶸《詩品》，後者出自顏延之，承其說者在解釋上極爲紛岐，亦多互爲牽連。然而，在文學史上大致文多認定鮑照是繼顏延之、謝靈運之後劉宋主要的詩人，故宜當有辨。
本文將探索「休鮑」論、「險俗」說的立論取向及其衍生的解釋問題，辨析古來對鮑照詩持負面批評的主要論點。力求正本清源，希望有助於化解有關鮑照詩批評上的爭議，並給予較爲合理的評價。

關鍵字

鮑照 ； 顏延之 ； 休鮑論 ； 險俗說 ； 詩品

並列摘要

A number of modern scholars have been highly critical of Bao Zhao's poetry, many of them directing their condemnation not only at his poetry, but at his personal character as well. Most of criticism of Bao Zhao is influenced by of the appraisal in Zhong Rong's Shi Pin (Poetry Gradings) of Bao Zhao, using the term ”Xian Su” (險俗) and Yan Yan-zhi's use of the term ”Xiu Bao.” (体鮑) (referring to the poetic style of Bao Zhao and Tang Hui-xiu). A number of variations have proliferated from these critical stances, many of them interrelated and none in complete agreement However, in general, Bao Zhao has been generally recognized as an important poet of Liu Song Dynasty in literary history behind Yan Yanzhi and Xie Lingyun.
This study will explore the theoretical ideas behind Xiu Bao and Xian Su, and problems that derive from divergent evolution along these theoretical lines, while analyzing the major points of negative criticism against Bao Zhao's poetry. The study will do its best to thoroughly rework and begin to resolve the critical disputes over of Bao Zhao's poems, and ultimately offer a more reasonable evaluation.

並列關鍵字

Bao Zhao ； Yan Yanzhi ； Xian Su ； Xiu Bao ； Shih Pin ； criticism

參考文獻

齊沈約(1987)。宋書。北京:中華書局。

梁蕭子顯(1987)。南齊書。北京:中華書局。

梁蕭統編、唐李善注(1991)。文選。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。

梁徐陵編、吳兆宜注、程琰刪補(1992)。玉臺新詠箋注。北京:中華書局。

唐姚思廉(1987)。梁書。北京:中華書局。