訓詁學新體系之建構：從當前訓詁學研究之回顧與反思談起

Constructing a New System for Historical Semantics: With Reference to the Existing Researches

劉文清(Wen-Ching Liu)

《臺大文史哲學報》 62期 (2005/05) Pp. 381-419

https://doi.org/10.6258/bcla.2005.62.14

摘要

本文首先回顧近十年訓詁學之發展概況，指出本時期訓詁學研究之最大特色在於多元化之風貌，而整體目標則在實現訓詁學之現代轉型與重構。然而，經過多年之努力，訓詁學之現代化仍未能徹底完成，本文因此針對當前之困境提出反思，並結合現代詮釋學之觀念，嘗試重新擬構一套訓詁學之體系，主要內容包括：訓詁學學科性質之釐定、方法之系統化、術語之客觀梳理、研究內容之深化與實踐工作之強化等五方面，庶幾建立科學化、詮釋化之現代訓詁學。

關鍵字

訓詁學:注釋 ； 訓詁方法 ； 訓詁術語

並列摘要

This paper reviews the development of Historical Semantics over the last decade, pointing out that the most important feature of Historical Semantics up to now is diversity, and its overall objective to realize the transformation and reconstruction of Historical Semantics.In spite of the endeavor after so many years, however, the modernization of Historical Semantics is yet to be achieved. Therefore, this paper proposes a reflection upon the predicaments faced presently and an incorporation of contemporary Hermeneutics concept to develop a new system of Historical Semantics. This new system includes the characterization of Historical Semantics as a discipline, the systematization of its methodology, the objective classification of terminology, the solidification of research contents and the strengthening of the practice- all required to establish a contemporary Historical Semantics that is scientific and interpretive.

並列關鍵字

Historical Semantics ； Scholium ； Historical Semantic method ； Historical Semantic terminology

參考文獻

毛遠明(2002)。訓詁學新編。成都:巴蜀書社。

王力(1980)。龍蟲並雕齋文集第一冊‧新訓詁學。北京:中華書局。

王引之(2000)。經義述聞。南京:江蘇古籍。

王引之(2000)。經傳釋詞。南京:江蘇古籍。

王念孫(2000)。讀書雜志。南京:江蘇古籍。