- 期刊
做為思想史的歷史－柯靈烏命題的意義及侷限
History as the History of Thought: The Meaning and Limitation of Collingwood's Thesis
並列摘要
Collingwood's famous statement that all history is the history of thought is analyzed in this paper. It is argued that, for Collingwood, to understand history is to re-enact the historical agent's thought; that is, the valid practical reasoning through which the agent determines his actions. As a consequence, some states of affairs that are generally regarded as objects of the historical narrative are thereby excluded from the horizon of historical understanding.
參考文獻
余英時(1976)。歷史與思想。臺北:聯經。
林正珍(1983)。柯靈烏史學的中心觀念。史學研究。3，25-60。
黃進興(1992)。歷史主義與歷史理論。臺北:允晨。
Abel. Th.,H. Feigi(Eds.),M. Brodbeck. (Eds.)(1953).Reading in the Philosophy of Science.N. Y.:Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Carr, E. H.(1986).What is History? With a New Introduction by Richard J. Evans.Hampshire:Palgrave.
被引用紀錄
林宣佑（2014）。二程思想體系研究――以「體用」為核心的開展〔碩士論文，國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0016-2912201413494728
延伸閱讀
- 劉紀蕙（2015）。運動之後的思想：回應柄谷行人關於「超越民主」的問題－從《哲學的起源》出發。文化研究，(20)，246-251。https://doi.org/10.6752/JCS.201503_(20).0015
- 何乏筆（2010）。哲學生命與工夫論的批判意涵：關於晚期傅柯主體觀的反思。文化研究，(11)，143-167。https://doi.org/10.6752/JCS.201006_(11).0010
- 尤煌傑（2001）。引頸企盼的思維者：關於人的意義的考察。應用心理研究，(9)，87-114。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=15609251-200103-x-9-87-114-a
- 葉崗（2000）。Stylistic Consciousness and the Layout of Literary History。中國文哲研究集刊，(17)，217-235。https://doi.org/10.6351/BICLP.200009.0217
- 陳國球（1996）。Narrative, Ideology, and the Writing of Literary History。中外文學，25(7)，135-162。https://doi.org/10.6637/CWLQ.1996.25(7).135-162