透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.228.88
  • 期刊

「物色」:一個彰顯中國抒情傳統發展的理論概念

Wuse (物色): An Important Critical Concept of the Chinese Lyric Tradition

摘要


「物色」作為文論術語最早出現於梁代劉勰的《文心雕龍》,這一特定歷史時期產生的理論概念,實標誌著中國抒情傳統中一個重大的觀念變化,即伴隨「山水詩」而發展起來的人對外物世界的現象論態度。然而長期以來,學界存在著「物色」與「感物」概念混淆的狀況。故此,本文嘗試探討了「物色」這一概念的歷史成因。通過對比「感物詩」與「山水詩」在觀物態度與方式上的本質區別,旨在劃清「物色論」與「感物說」之界限;並通過追蹤「色」字的語義衍變過程以及佛教的影響,進而揭示「物色論」的理論內涵及其標識性意義。

並列摘要


This paper attempts to explore the formation of the term wuse (物色, the appearances of things) as a concept of literary theory, which first appeared in Liu Xie's Wen Xin Diao Long (文心雕龍). For a long time, critics have confused the concepts of wuse and ganwu (感物, stirring-and-response), and overlooked the important role that wuse played in the development of the Chinese lyric tradition. By comparing ways of looking at scenery and poets' attitude towards scenery in ganwu poetry and landscape poetry, the paper tries to make a distinction between these two critical concepts. Furthermore, by tracing the use of the word se (色) in ancient literature, the author finds that Buddhist Phenomenalism seems to have triggered the sense of ”scenery” in this word. The paper analyzes the relationship between this sense of ”scenery” in se and the concept of wuse, and demonstrates the significance of the concept of wuse in Chinese literary criticism.

參考文獻


戰國呂不韋編(1996)。呂氏春秋。上海:上海古籍出版社。
漢王充(1936)。四部備要:論衡。上海:中華書局。
漢孔安國注、唐孔穎達疏(2003)。阮元刻本《十三經註疏》。北京:中華書局。
漢孔安國注、唐孔穎達疏(2003)。阮元刻本《十三經註疏》。北京:中華書局。
漢司馬遷撰、日攏川龜太郎考證(2006)。史記會注考證。臺北:大安出版社。

被引用紀錄


吳品萫(2016)。詩中「詩」:《全唐詩》中論詩詞彙之考察〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201600741
陳秋宏(2012)。從「氣感遷化」到「興會體物」—論六朝詩歌中知覺觀感之轉移〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.02812
鄭婷尹(2019)。論《采菽堂古詩選》之「虛」評於物色中之表現臺大中文學報(67),87-140。https://doi.org/10.6281/NTUCL.201912_(67).0003
劉立葳(2015)。金履祥《濂洛風雅》所形塑的理學詩典範〔碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0016-0312201510240607

延伸閱讀