並列摘要
Genre names like tragedy, novel, and so on, are labels which we generally use with great confidence. At the same time, the status of ”genres” has always been hotly debated: Discussions on ”genre” generally end up in an ontological battle between essentialism and nominalism. The hypothesis here will be that the reason for this permanent oscillation between two incompatible answers is due to the belief that there can be only one good answer. This paper explores the possibility that what is labelled by one term-”genre” or ”kind”-could refer really to a wide range of different facts. Such an exploration asks for a change in methodology: To understand what ”genres” are, our starting-point can only be the linguistic uses to which genre labels are put; it is only after gaining a thorough understanding of the socially embedded language game of ”genres”, that we can address the more complex question of the possibly multiple relationships between genre labels and textual facts.
延伸閱讀
- 鄭楚甯（2020）。Between Naturalism and Normativism: The presupposition of Legal Normativity as Practical Reason〔碩士論文，國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201904374
- 游承霖（2005）。The Incompatibility of Determinism and Moral Responsibility〔碩士論文，國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2005.02543
- Slote, M. (2014). Sentimentalist Epistemology. 哲學與文化, 41(3), 17-45. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10158383-201403-201404230034-201404230034-17-45
- 陳今偉（2013）。On Epistemic Two-Dimentionalism〔博士論文，國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613535449
- 彭孟堯（2005）。Reliability, Intellectual Virtues, and the Internal Dimension of Epistemic Justification。東吳哲學學報，(11)，99-125。https://doi.org/10.29732/SJPS.200502.0003