並列摘要
Sartre was a prolific writer of novels, dramas, essays, biographical or philosophical essays. His existentialism was the most prominent school of thought in France after World War Ⅱ, contending that writers were supposed to express their opinions about the contemporary society and political events through their works. Sartre was the representative intellect who actually practiced such an idea of participation. But while Sartre's political position and practice often contradicted the fundamental theories of his philosophy, could the former be in balance with the latter? There have been abundant researches Sartre's existentialism, and this paper is to analyze other aspects of Sartre's thought from the perspective of an historian.
延伸閱讀
- 朱鴻洲（2011）。戲劇與哲學：以沙特與貝克特為例。藝術學報，(89)，324-347+349。https://doi.org/10.6793/JNTCA.201110.0324
- 何畫瑰（2002）。書評：蘇珊．列芬《重返哲學與詩之間的古老爭執－柏拉圖與希臘的文學傳統》。臺大文史哲學報，(57)，223-232。https://doi.org/10.6258/bcla.2002.57.08
- 蕭振邦（1988）。亞里斯多德VS.柏拉圖－觀念論的批判與形上學的開展。鵝湖月刊，(158)，21-28。https://doi.org/10.29652/LM.198808.0006
- 洪鎌德（2012）。語言、語意與人本主義─波蘭哲學家亞當‧沙夫對東歐新馬克思主義的發展與貢獻。哲學與文化，39(3)，17-38。https://doi.org/10.7065/MRPC.201203.0019
- 楊婉儀（2019）。對於沙特人道主義的詮釋與批判。哲學與文化，46(9)，161-175。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10158383-201909-201910010011-201910010011-161-175