透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.222.67.251

摘要


在蒯因的哲學立場中,最不清楚的應該是他對「真」的看法。或許他最關注的是經驗與理論之間的關係,是經驗內容、證據、與袤廣科學理論間的關聯。「真」這個概念在他的哲學理論中,似乎擺盪於不同的立場之間。譬如說,蒯因對經驗上相等理論何者為真的家國式立場(sectarian position),戴維森認為正是支持融貫真理理論的結果。但另一方面,蒯因似乎又認為塔斯基的真理語架,對真理符應理論提供了合理的說明。當然,蒯因同時又是縮簡主義真理理論的早期倡導者之一,明確說過「真就是引號消除(disquotation)」。 本文將以蒯因本身的理論為基礎,探討蒯因針對消解引號「真」、融貫「真」、符應「真」、或內在「真」(immanent truth)的諸般主張。我想要論證的是,我們必須認真看待蒯因的消解引號「真」理論,如此才能對他上述關於「真」的諸般言論,提出一致的解釋。我認為,蒯因並未在消解引號「真」之外,又主張任何知識論上或存有學上的「真」。所有他關於「真」的考慮,皆可以、也應該以消解引號「真」理論作為詮釋的出發點。「真」這個字在許多脈絡中的出現,應該被視為集合性語詞,只是縮寫或表達具備共同特性的相關「真」語句而已。

並列摘要


Among Quine's philosophy, his account on truth is probably the mistiest part. Perhaps what concerns him most is the relation between experience and scientific theories, is the relation between empirical content, evidence, and scientific theories in the broad sense. His attitude toward the conception of truth seems to vacillate between different theories, due to his various philosophical positions. For instance, regarding Quine's sectarian position of which empirically equivalent theories should be taken as true, Davidson thinks that it is the consequence of holding the coherence theory of truth. On the other hand, Quine appears to consider Tarski's T schema as giving the correspondence theory of truth a sensible account. Moreover, Quine is one of the trail-blazers of the deflationary theory of truth, stating specifically ”Truth is disquotation”. This paper is based on Quine's own theory, discussing his multiple claims regarding disquotational truth, coherent truth, correspondence truth, or immanent truth. What I would like to argue is that, in order to consistently explain his various claims concerning truth, we have to take Quine's disquotational theory of truth seriously. I think that, except his disquotational account, Quine does not make any claim of epistemological truth or ontological truth. All of his consideration regarding truth can be and should be explained in terms of his disquotational theory of truth. The appearance of the word 'true'/'truth' in many contexts should be seen as playing a collective term, as abbreviating or expressing true sentences with the same feature.

參考文獻


Bergström, Lars,Robert B. Barrett,Roger F. Gibson(ed.)(1990).Perspectives on Quine.Cambridge, Mass.:Basil Blackwell.
Bergström, Lars,Alex Orenstein,Petr Kotatko(ed.)(2000).Knowledge, Language, and Logic: Questions for Quine.Kliwer Academic.
Bergström, Lars,Dagfinn Føllesdall(ed.)(2001).Quine`s Truth.Philosophy of Quine.4
Bergström, Lars,Roger F. Gibson(ed.)(2004).The Cambridge Companion to Quine.Cambridge University Press.
David, Marian A.(1996).Analyticity, Carnap, Quine, and Truth.(Philosophical Perspectives, 10, Metaphysics).

被引用紀錄


葉諭陵(2017)。保險實物給付研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2017.00909
Pawinski, M. (2017). 複雜衝突環境中的文化構件:知識、覺知,與感受 [doctoral dissertation, Tamkang University]. Airiti Library. https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2017.00533
葉進鋒(2015)。長期看護保險核保制度比較研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2015.00452
鄭椀止(2013)。俄羅斯伏特加產業之國家競爭優勢分析〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2013.00772
洪嫣璘(2011)。台灣地區退休信心初探〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2011.01009

延伸閱讀


  • 李成晴(2015)。“何論”考人文中國學報(21),517-529。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20130110002-201511-201511180004-201511180004-517-529
  • 龔鵬程(1978)。崇有論駁議鵝湖月刊(39),38-40。https://doi.org/10.29652/LM.197809.0007
  • 曹偉、王綺雯、吳國斌(2007)。論無證可辨中醫藥研究論叢10(2),1-10。https://doi.org/10.6516/TJTCM.200709_10(2).0001
  • 徐自強(2012)。The Truth of Being OK at One Time品質月刊48(10),25-28。https://doi.org/10.29999/QM.201210.0006
  • 莊佳珣(2006)。Sentence and Truth Value哲學與文化33(6),67-77。https://doi.org/10.7065/MRPC.200606.0067

國際替代計量