透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.117.70.132
  • 期刊

試論《周易》“致用之變”―原典與詮釋

On "the Change of Effectiveness" of Zhou Yi-Source-book and Annotation

摘要


《周易》為中國文化之中年代極為久遠,且帶有神秘色彩的文獻典籍,孔子晚喜《易》,韋編三絕。西漢武帝時候設立《五經》博士,《易》亦置淤其中,足見其不可動搖的重要性。中國眾多思想家對於《周易》原典的「理解」與「詮釋」皆不盡相同,例如:鄭玄注《周易》是「取象」,王弼注《周易》是「取義」;王弼是以「道家」思想詮釋《周易》,程頤、朱熹則是以「儒家」思想;王弼、程頤、朱熹是以「義理J的角度闡述《周易》,章學誠談《周易》卻以「事理」的歷史思維做為詮釋進路。之所以眾說紛紜者,皆因思想家們對《周易》原典存有各自的「前理解」,故而有大相逕庭的「本體詮釋」與「創造詮釋」,本文將援引加達默爾「詮釋學」的觀念,論述中國《周易》原典,在歷經眾多思想家詮釋後的「致用之變」,期以爬梳出《周易》思想「典範流轉」的歷史軌跡。

關鍵字

周易 致用 原典 本體詮釋 創造詮釋 典範流轉

並列摘要


Zhou Yi its age is extremely remote for the Chinese culture, this literature ancient book also has the mystical color, Confucius's old age like to read Yi, the number of times is frequent. Martial emperor of Han dynasty sets up Five Classics doctor, Yi is the one of them, indicates its unshakeable importance. The Chinese multitudinous thinkers regarding Zhou Yi, the source-book ”understood” and ”the annotation” are different, for example: Zheng Hsuan explains the image from annotate Zhou Yi, Wang Pi explains the significance from annotate Zhou Yi; Wang Pi explains Zhou Yi by ”Taoism” thought, Cheng I and Zhu Xi explains Zhou Yi by ”Confucian” thought; Wang Pi, Cheng I, Zhu Xi explains Zhou Yi by ”the righteousness principle”, Zhan, Xue-Cheng discuss Zhou Yi by the historical thought which equates ”the thought of affair”. The reason of people have wide divided opinions is the thinkers have their ”Vorsicht” from the source-book of Zhou Yi, so there are very different in ”the Ontological Interpretations” and ”the Creative Interpretations”, this article quotes the hermeneutic idea from Gadamer, and elaborate the source-book of Chinese Zhou Yi which change of the effectiveness after many thinker's annotation, then hope to reorganize the thought of Zhou Yi and that model pasts in historical path.

參考文獻


西漢司馬遷撰、瀧川龜太郎考證。史記會注考證。臺北:大安出版社。
東漢班固(1996)。漢書。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
東漢鄭玄注、宋岳珂校(1975)。禮記鄭注。臺北:新興書局。
東漢鄭玄注、宋王應麟輯、清、惠棟增補(1985)。鄭氏周易注。北京:中華書局。
魏王弼(1976)。周易略例。臺北:成文出版社。

延伸閱讀